Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

New exhaust installed but,

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2004, 05:00 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
george16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
New exhaust installed but,

I felt that I lost a lot of low end torque. It's a custom 2 1/4" piping with a stainless Magnaflow muffler installed. Sound is good but like I said I definitely lost a lot of low end torque. Time for the SC i think . Anybody noticed this too? I'll post a pic later.

George
Old 09-12-2004, 06:09 AM
  #2  
Guest
 
4RUNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Pole
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Toyota tunes engines. Meineke welds.
Old 09-12-2004, 10:38 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Birdman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 487
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You may just need to give the ECU time to adjust, although I'm not sure how it would compensate for this. I took out the fuse for the ECU to speed things up just in case. Does anybody know if this type of mod will result in the ECU making any changes to the mix?
Old 09-12-2004, 10:40 AM
  #4  
Contributing Member
 
Good Times's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Birdman is definitely on the right track. Whenever you do any performance mods it's a good idea to clear the ECU so that it can relearn w/ the new settings. Give that a try and see if it works. Best to pull the fuse and let it sit for a few minutes.

Good Luck
Old 09-12-2004, 06:25 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
george16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks guys. I did that this afternoon. I haven't driven it yet since pulling out the EFI fuse so hopefully it'll work out ok. I let you all know the outcome.

George
Old 09-12-2004, 07:06 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
grams72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moorhead MN
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ECU not EFI
Old 09-12-2004, 07:15 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
grams72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moorhead MN
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do you still have the Cat. installed?
Old 09-12-2004, 07:33 PM
  #8  
Contributing Member
 
AgRunner06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm almost 100% positive that the 3.4 is supposed to have 2.5" piping not 2 1/4". I've got 2 1/4" pipe for my exhaust. If that is really what you used then I would say that is why you lost power. You increased the backpressure thus losing power.
Old 09-12-2004, 07:39 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
george16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by AgRunner06
I'm almost 100% positive that the 3.4 is supposed to have 2.5" piping not 2 1/4". I've got 2 1/4" pipe for my exhaust. If that is really what you used then I would say that is why you lost power. You increased the backpressure thus losing power.
The pipe size for the 3.4 is 2.25". It's not 2.5" as a lot of people think. I did the measurements and have the shop verify it to be 2.25". I actually lost backpressure hence the lost low-end torque.

George
Old 09-12-2004, 07:40 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
george16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by grams72
Do you still have the Cat. installed?
Yes I do. The stock cat is still installed.

George
Old 09-12-2004, 07:41 PM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
george16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 4RUNR
Toyota tunes engines. Meineke welds.
Good thing I didn't have Meineke do the exhaust .

George
Old 09-12-2004, 08:51 PM
  #12  
Contributing Member
 
AgRunner06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by george16
The pipe size for the 3.4 is 2.25". It's not 2.5" as a lot of people think. I did the measurements and have the shop verify it to be 2.25". I actually lost backpressure hence the lost low-end torque.

George


Old 09-12-2004, 08:57 PM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
george16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by AgRunner06


That info sheet lists the recommended pipe sizes for different type of engines. Unless you have a 3rd generation runner, you will know exactly what the OEM exhaust pipe size is. Go to the dealer with your tape measure and measure it for yourself . I decided have to stay with the OEM size hence I had a 2.25" catback made . The 3.4 only makes about 183 HP at the crank.

George

Last edited by george16; 09-12-2004 at 08:59 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Team420
Early Land Cruisers
1
12-30-2015 01:31 PM
RatOmeter
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
15
10-22-2015 03:17 PM
tj884Rdlx
Newbie Tech Section
25
08-28-2015 12:04 PM
hexrain
Prerunner & All 2WD Rigs
4
07-12-2015 01:13 PM
Coreyr384
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
2
07-10-2015 11:13 AM



Quick Reply: New exhaust installed but,



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:03 PM.