Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

MAF Conversion Mod 3.0 2nd gen

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 01:16 PM
  #61  
axon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Fort Belvoir, VA
Originally Posted by Faded
axon,

I didn't mean to come off being offensive, .

no offense was taken, but it was painful to review all the money I have sunk into her so far. :pat: and you were close 192k on her now

Post the write up and if I have time I will do it before hand.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 10:26 PM
  #62  
rocket's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,683
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Bump for more interest in a product to give 3.4s a run for their money!

4x4Lamm, why blow money for that K&N when you can get a REAL intake kit?
We need people like you that are willling to spend!!
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 11:45 PM
  #63  
deathrunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,969
Likes: 1
From: San Diego CA
Would this mod be available for the 22re?
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 11:51 PM
  #64  
rocket's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,683
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
I actually asked about that but the reply from Josh @ CPE was "no".
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 08:24 AM
  #65  
deathrunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,969
Likes: 1
From: San Diego CA
Josh @ CPE sucks

He'd be cool if he said "yes"

I don't see why this isn't offered for 22RE, just wouldn't offer big enough gains? It seems to be the same system just on a smaller motor. If it wouldn't be smog legal, I couldn't do it anyway.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 08:40 AM
  #66  
Platypus1's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
I wish they would hurry! I would definately be interested in the purchase.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 06:34 AM
  #67  
w3s's Avatar
w3s
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Wichita
just bumping for interest...I have some $ saved up for a lift but waiting to see if this mod happens first. If its safe for our 3.0 and the price is right Im in..
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 09:49 AM
  #68  
89macrunner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 1
From: Tempe, AZ
im shaking in my boots waiting for this mod


any new news?
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 11:08 AM
  #69  
Crassus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Peoria
I've personally used CP-E and they are the real deal!

I know this is an old topic, but I just joined the board and wanted to reassure everyone here, that CP-E is the real deal. I just traded my Mazda6s V6 in for my '05 4runner. I purchased their intake and mafci kit. It seriously made a difference in the performance of the car. So much in fact, that the stock wishbone engine mount on the engine snapped from the added torque. I never had my car officially dynoed before or after, but it was a enough of an increase in performance that I needed no convincing. The install was very easy. The mafci attached to the stock ecu via tapping into the wire harness. I have no electrical background and installed it easily. You have the option to use Scotchlocks or soldering. Best of all, no check engine light codes were thrown compared to competing companies like AEM and Injen.

I would highly recommend any of you who are interested in increasing the performance of their 4runner, V8 and V6 included, to donate their car to CP-E. If I lived closer, I would donate my 4runner for testing.

I would also like to mention that for being a smaller company, CP-E has terrific customer service. If you have problems or questions with the product, they are more than willing to help satisfy.

My two cents..
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 11:30 AM
  #70  
Snorkeldepth's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 591
Likes: 2
From: Orange County, California
If it will do the same thing as my Edge did for my Cummins (lots more hp/torque and better mpg . . . . when I'm not testing the hp/torque) then I'm very interested.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 11:50 AM
  #71  
dwh91102's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 0
From: Aurora, Indiana
Originally Posted by axon
no offense was taken, but it was painful to review all the money I have sunk into her so far. :pat: and you were close 192k on her now

Post the write up and if I have time I will do it before hand.
Dude I don't want to sound harsh, but a baseline dyno run on a motor with 192k is NOT a good idea just my .02
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 11:53 AM
  #72  
celica's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 1
it would show the relatve increase. If the motor is worn and you don't do a before and after run then you won't know the real increase (ie x%).
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 01:35 PM
  #73  
dwh91102's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 0
From: Aurora, Indiana
Originally Posted by celica
it would show the relatve increase. If the motor is worn and you don't do a before and after run then you won't know the real increase (ie x%).
thats not quite my point, im not worried about what results the maf conversion is going to show. You go trying to do a fuel air mod testing on a motor with 192k the results are going to be pointless when it don't run at all anymore
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 03:04 PM
  #74  
celica's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 1
The point of running the before is to have a baseline. If you only do the after then you won't know what the increase is. You will only know what the end result is but you don't kjnow how that would compare to stock due to wear, other mods, etc? I am not sure what you mean by it wouldn't run anyways. Wouldn't you want to know the potential increase before you shell out $500?

Matt
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 08:03 PM
  #75  
masterwacker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio
i agree with celica
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 08:29 PM
  #76  
rocket's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,683
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by dwh91102
You go trying to do a fuel air mod testing on a motor with 192k the results are going to be pointless when it don't run at all anymore
Please, if your not interested then keep criticism to yourself or refer to post #38
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2005 | 02:42 AM
  #77  
Bumpin' Yota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota, FL
Updates?
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #78  
axon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Fort Belvoir, VA
SEMA was last week (1-4 nov) so I should hear something soon.

And yes I'm kind of worried about pushing my engine to do the DYNO, but "no pain, no gain"
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2005 | 10:56 PM
  #79  
Crymson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
ttt Hate to see this idea get buried. Any Progress?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2005 | 12:05 AM
  #80  
rocket's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,683
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Thanks for reminder and welcome to the forum!
This mod is seriously going to be the difference between myself getting a rebuilt/new 3.0 or a 3.4 motor swap! So if axon dont chime in soon i'll give CPE another call and see where it stands...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:29 PM.