Nitrous Enterprises
#501
Originally Posted by r0cky
Why in the HELL are people still buying that crap?!
But I guess we've all done what we can. If people read this thread and decide to continue on with their NE parts, I guess there's nothing else to do.
But I guess we've all done what we can. If people read this thread and decide to continue on with their NE parts, I guess there's nothing else to do.However, there is more that can be and is being done. As every kit that NE sells can potentially cause injury to me (and you and everyone else) personally, I will not back down as long as NE is in business selling what I believe to be unsafe products.
#502
Originally Posted by r0cky
doubtful, Herman.
Oh, but hey, I did just receive an email that I then bounced:
We have been informed that you are unsatisfied with your rear NE spacers.
We would love the opportunity to provide you with new 3.5" rear spacers on
us if you are insterested. Thank you.
NE Management
Hm.
Oh, but hey, I did just receive an email that I then bounced:We have been informed that you are unsatisfied with your rear NE spacers.
We would love the opportunity to provide you with new 3.5" rear spacers on
us if you are insterested. Thank you.
NE Management
Hm.
BTW r0cky, for legal reasons, I urge you not to return any of your parts to NE. Otherwise known as returning the evidence.
#503
Originally Posted by r0cky
just received the following PM:
hm. Kind of sad that every time I get one of these random PM's I think it's him.
hm. Kind of sad that every time I get one of these random PM's I think it's him.

#504
Originally Posted by bulldog-yota
I wish more people would patent their designs, as I'm tired of places like NE just stealing other people's ideas.
#505
I should have checked the mail yesterday. The reply from WA state arrived. I now have a copy of the NE application to form an LLC. The people executing the LLC were Ian S. Neeld, Ryan Cloud, and Anthony Krueger. No one else is listed. This was dated 7/15/2004. The owner status could have changed since then.
Tracy, it appears you were never an owner. And even if they did eventually give you shares of the company, that would not make you an owner. So you were neither an owner nor an officer. You were, in effect, an employee. As such, no liability should flow down to you.
I assume you did not get paid cash for your work and that the offer of shares in the company was for compensation for your website, marketing, and customer service efforts. This isn't unusual and happens all the time. However, since you have apparently received neither cash nor shares, you may have a cause of action against NE. The only minor snag is that there wasn't a written agreement. That can work for you as well as against you. Mostly I would think it would work for you. As I said before, no one would expect you to work for free.
I urge you to gather up as much data as you can about the time and materials you put into NE. Anything at all to do with you modifying your truck. You paying full price for the NE kit as well as buying new rims and tires. Everything. Especially though, the time spent making the web sites (I know there were two versions of the website) and the time spent on the forums and through email marketing and acting as customer service. Also, don't forget the time and materials you used to put together the write ups for the lifts. Those came directly from you, so I assume you paid for the copying and mailing.
I'd be willing to bet that the total amount -- especially the time spent -- would be enough to make it worth it for a lawyer to take on your case and get what you are owed by NE.
There are some other options with regards to legal action that I'll be going into soon.
Tracy, it appears you were never an owner. And even if they did eventually give you shares of the company, that would not make you an owner. So you were neither an owner nor an officer. You were, in effect, an employee. As such, no liability should flow down to you.
I assume you did not get paid cash for your work and that the offer of shares in the company was for compensation for your website, marketing, and customer service efforts. This isn't unusual and happens all the time. However, since you have apparently received neither cash nor shares, you may have a cause of action against NE. The only minor snag is that there wasn't a written agreement. That can work for you as well as against you. Mostly I would think it would work for you. As I said before, no one would expect you to work for free.
I urge you to gather up as much data as you can about the time and materials you put into NE. Anything at all to do with you modifying your truck. You paying full price for the NE kit as well as buying new rims and tires. Everything. Especially though, the time spent making the web sites (I know there were two versions of the website) and the time spent on the forums and through email marketing and acting as customer service. Also, don't forget the time and materials you used to put together the write ups for the lifts. Those came directly from you, so I assume you paid for the copying and mailing.
I'd be willing to bet that the total amount -- especially the time spent -- would be enough to make it worth it for a lawyer to take on your case and get what you are owed by NE.
There are some other options with regards to legal action that I'll be going into soon.
#506
Inbox full
Hey folks--
I posted in another thread my refund request to NE and their amusing response.
Today I sent a followup with a harsher tone.
I got an instant response, though it wasn't quite what I was looking for.
I've already pulled my relocs out, and I'm about to replace the NE spacers with Daystar's 1" leveling kit, which will raise the front 1" from how it sits in this photo of my truck with big tires and no lift. I've seen a photo or two of rigs with this kit, but none are clear enough to really form an impression about whether it will appear to sag in the back, level or not. Any suggestions?
Here is my latest writeup of my NE experience. It will receive updates throughout the saga.
I posted in another thread my refund request to NE and their amusing response.
Today I sent a followup with a harsher tone.
I have been polite and courteous to you throughout our relationship.
Here's a guy (hre814) who resorted to lying to you to get his refund,
and it seems to have worked.
http://www.toyota-4runner.org/showth...&threadid=9116
Do I need to go to FTC/ NHTSA like the rest of your unsatisfied
customers (Carol at 1-800-424-9393 ext 1014), resulting in more time
and money wasted by you and I both, or are we going to take care of
this like adults? Answer carefully: this is my last attempt to ask you
directly.
Here's a guy (hre814) who resorted to lying to you to get his refund,
and it seems to have worked.
http://www.toyota-4runner.org/showth...&threadid=9116
Do I need to go to FTC/ NHTSA like the rest of your unsatisfied
customers (Carol at 1-800-424-9393 ext 1014), resulting in more time
and money wasted by you and I both, or are we going to take care of
this like adults? Answer carefully: this is my last attempt to ask you
directly.
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<info@nitrousenterprises.com>
(reason: can't create (user) output file)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
procmail: Quota exceeded while writing "/var/spool/mail/info"
550 5.0.0 <info@nitrousenterprises.com>... Can't create output
Final-Recipient: RFC822; info@nitrousenterprises.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.3.0
Diagnostic-Code: X-Unix; 73
Last-Attempt-Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 13:40:14 -0800
<info@nitrousenterprises.com>
(reason: can't create (user) output file)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
procmail: Quota exceeded while writing "/var/spool/mail/info"
550 5.0.0 <info@nitrousenterprises.com>... Can't create output
Final-Recipient: RFC822; info@nitrousenterprises.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.3.0
Diagnostic-Code: X-Unix; 73
Last-Attempt-Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 13:40:14 -0800
Here is my latest writeup of my NE experience. It will receive updates throughout the saga.
#508
You are not listed at all on the certificate of formation, which is all I received. If someone were to go after NE legally, they would go after the persons mentioned there. Also, each of the individuals printed and signed their own names. So if you didn't sign anything personally, then they forged your signature. If you'd like, I can make a photocopy and mail it to you. I'd just take a photo and post it, but I'm currently without a camera.
There is still the outstanding issue of how you were to be paid for your work. You didn't work for free. There can be an operating agreement that dictates all of this. It's a good practice to have one, which is why I doubt that NE has one. Anyway, this would also dictate what happens when someone pulls out of the company. However, they can't write one up after the fact and then apply it to you.
Bottom line is that you are entitled to compensation for work performed. I again urge you to add it all up. You may be surprised at how much time you worked for them and how much they owe you.
There is still the outstanding issue of how you were to be paid for your work. You didn't work for free. There can be an operating agreement that dictates all of this. It's a good practice to have one, which is why I doubt that NE has one. Anyway, this would also dictate what happens when someone pulls out of the company. However, they can't write one up after the fact and then apply it to you.
Bottom line is that you are entitled to compensation for work performed. I again urge you to add it all up. You may be surprised at how much time you worked for them and how much they owe you.
#509
NE is blowing smoke up... and the contradictions are coming fast and furious. As a third party, I can only get this information one little piece at a time and can only make a judgement on the pieces received.
1. You are not listed at all on the Certificate of Formation dated 7/15/2004.
2. You may be listed elsewhere, either in other documents filed with the state or in other internal documents. Obviously, I cannot get any internal documents. I'll call the state department again on Monday and see if they have anything else available.
3. In the original Certificate of formation, it has separate signatures from each of the three individuals. You have stated previously that you never signed anything. If they updated this document and submitted that update to the state with your signature, then they forged your signature.
4. If you did not, in fact, sign anything and they submitted ANY document to the state with your signature, then they forged your signature. HOT DAMN, we may have something there. You can bet I'll be in touch with the state department to get any/everything on NE. Any document filed with the state should be available to the public. If it is, I'll get it.
5. Any internal documents not filed with the state are, obviously, out of reach (for the moment).
However, none of this really matters. According to you, you never signed anything, never saw their articles of incorporation or operating agreement, and were never clear about your status. In fact, it sounds as if you are still not clear about your status. I kind of doubt whether you were ever listed as anything at all, but we may never know. However, EMPLOYEES ARE NEVER LISTED IN ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OR OPERATING AGREEMENTS. Why would they be?
In any case, YOU ARE ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION FOR YOUR WORK. It is incorrect to say that, " as a manager, I receive no payment, and can have all my shares in the company taken from me and given to others.". NO, NO, NO!
"NE Management" can put whatever they like in their internal documents. Those documents still have to abide by the laws of the land. Anything going against the law will be deemed as null and void.
Paying someone in shares of a company is common. However, when this is done, there must be an agreement -- an agreement which is AGREED to by all parties (which is why it is called an agreement). The agreement would list the specific reasons how shares may be taken back. If you never saw the agreement and never signed the agreement then you never agreed to the agreement.
I really think you may have old Tony boy by the balls here. I really do wish you'd start adding up all your hours.
1. You are not listed at all on the Certificate of Formation dated 7/15/2004.
2. You may be listed elsewhere, either in other documents filed with the state or in other internal documents. Obviously, I cannot get any internal documents. I'll call the state department again on Monday and see if they have anything else available.
3. In the original Certificate of formation, it has separate signatures from each of the three individuals. You have stated previously that you never signed anything. If they updated this document and submitted that update to the state with your signature, then they forged your signature.
4. If you did not, in fact, sign anything and they submitted ANY document to the state with your signature, then they forged your signature. HOT DAMN, we may have something there. You can bet I'll be in touch with the state department to get any/everything on NE. Any document filed with the state should be available to the public. If it is, I'll get it.
5. Any internal documents not filed with the state are, obviously, out of reach (for the moment).
However, none of this really matters. According to you, you never signed anything, never saw their articles of incorporation or operating agreement, and were never clear about your status. In fact, it sounds as if you are still not clear about your status. I kind of doubt whether you were ever listed as anything at all, but we may never know. However, EMPLOYEES ARE NEVER LISTED IN ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OR OPERATING AGREEMENTS. Why would they be?
In any case, YOU ARE ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION FOR YOUR WORK. It is incorrect to say that, " as a manager, I receive no payment, and can have all my shares in the company taken from me and given to others.". NO, NO, NO!
"NE Management" can put whatever they like in their internal documents. Those documents still have to abide by the laws of the land. Anything going against the law will be deemed as null and void.
Paying someone in shares of a company is common. However, when this is done, there must be an agreement -- an agreement which is AGREED to by all parties (which is why it is called an agreement). The agreement would list the specific reasons how shares may be taken back. If you never saw the agreement and never signed the agreement then you never agreed to the agreement.
I really think you may have old Tony boy by the balls here. I really do wish you'd start adding up all your hours.
#510
What do you mean they gave you shares? Did you receive anything on paper? If so, do you still have it? Or did they just tell you they were giving you shares? If so, did they tell you a specific amount, or just that you had "some"?
So I gather that you have never seen or signed either an operating agreement or artiles of incorporation?
Both of these questions are kind of important. The reason is that you are entitled to compensation. The compensation can come in many forms. If it comes in the form of shares of a company, then you need to have read and signed any agreement that dictates how those shares may be taken from you. IF YOU DID NOT READ AN AGREEMENT AND DID NOT SIGN AN AGREEMENT THEN YOU DID NOT AGREE TO AN AGREEMENT.
Another reason is that the number of shares is meaningless. Say they gave you 1,000 shares. Is that a lot? I dunno. Depends on how many shares are outstanding. Your percentage ownership depends on the number of shares outstanding.
In addition, and this is key, your percentage ownership can change if the number of outstanding shares changes. Say, for example, that there were four thousand shares outstanding distributed to four people. In that case, you would have 1/4 of the total outstanding shares or 1/4 of the business. If they increased the number of outstanding shares, say to bring in a new partner, then your percentage interest in the business would drop. Because of this, the rules governing when and how new shares may be issued are usually very strict. If they are able to issue new shares without your knowledge, then you are almost definately not listed as an officer of the company. So they can use whatever words they want (using "manager" instead of "officer" for example), but the law will come back to bite them in the butt if they try to play games.
So I gather that you have never seen or signed either an operating agreement or artiles of incorporation?
Both of these questions are kind of important. The reason is that you are entitled to compensation. The compensation can come in many forms. If it comes in the form of shares of a company, then you need to have read and signed any agreement that dictates how those shares may be taken from you. IF YOU DID NOT READ AN AGREEMENT AND DID NOT SIGN AN AGREEMENT THEN YOU DID NOT AGREE TO AN AGREEMENT.
Another reason is that the number of shares is meaningless. Say they gave you 1,000 shares. Is that a lot? I dunno. Depends on how many shares are outstanding. Your percentage ownership depends on the number of shares outstanding.
In addition, and this is key, your percentage ownership can change if the number of outstanding shares changes. Say, for example, that there were four thousand shares outstanding distributed to four people. In that case, you would have 1/4 of the total outstanding shares or 1/4 of the business. If they increased the number of outstanding shares, say to bring in a new partner, then your percentage interest in the business would drop. Because of this, the rules governing when and how new shares may be issued are usually very strict. If they are able to issue new shares without your knowledge, then you are almost definately not listed as an officer of the company. So they can use whatever words they want (using "manager" instead of "officer" for example), but the law will come back to bite them in the butt if they try to play games.
#511
Originally Posted by r0cky
yet used the business account himself for personal charges.
Mixing business and personal use in a business account! EXCELLENT!!!!! This goes a LONG way to piercing the corporate veil and making AK personally responsible for everything.
#512
The only way to be certain that other people don't get screwed over or have their trucks wrecked by his parts is for him to stop making parts that wreck trucks. Whether that means he finally grows up, admits his mistakes and takes steps to remedy them or whether it means he goes out of business, either way he needs to be stopped.
From the arrogance he has shown, it is apparent to me that he is unwilling to admit even the slightest possibility that his design and manufacturing skills are less than exceptional. This 22 or so year-old college kid apparently has more skill (in his mind) than every other engineer in the automotive industry. He has been given every opportunity to make good on his past bad business practices and has chosen instead to continue putting other people's lives in danger (my opinion).
It is for this reason, that he is putting other people's lives in danger, that he must be stopped and that the effort to stop him cannot cease. I have first-hand knowledge that his products are, in my opinion, dangerous and will, given enough time, take a life. Because of this first-hand knowledge, I cannot, in good conscience, sit by and do nothing.
It would be easy to say that people have been warned. Only if they happen upon this or one of the other threads first. Not everyone, probably not many people at all, do an Internet search to see if a business is reputable before using their products.
I understand your reluctance though. A former friend is screwing people over and you just wish he’d stop and be done with it. Personally, it wouldn’t matter if it were my best friend. If my best friend were putting others lives at risk and I knew about it, I’d have to do all I could to stop it.
To answer your question though, no, you cannot have agreed to something just because someone has your SSN. You are entitled to compensation for your work. You could likely force NE and AK to give you compensation for your work and it sounds like that would come to a large sum. But you don’t have to decide right now. With a little luck and a little work, they’ll be stopped anyway.
And now, I have to get back to the “little work” part of this.
From the arrogance he has shown, it is apparent to me that he is unwilling to admit even the slightest possibility that his design and manufacturing skills are less than exceptional. This 22 or so year-old college kid apparently has more skill (in his mind) than every other engineer in the automotive industry. He has been given every opportunity to make good on his past bad business practices and has chosen instead to continue putting other people's lives in danger (my opinion).
It is for this reason, that he is putting other people's lives in danger, that he must be stopped and that the effort to stop him cannot cease. I have first-hand knowledge that his products are, in my opinion, dangerous and will, given enough time, take a life. Because of this first-hand knowledge, I cannot, in good conscience, sit by and do nothing.
It would be easy to say that people have been warned. Only if they happen upon this or one of the other threads first. Not everyone, probably not many people at all, do an Internet search to see if a business is reputable before using their products.
I understand your reluctance though. A former friend is screwing people over and you just wish he’d stop and be done with it. Personally, it wouldn’t matter if it were my best friend. If my best friend were putting others lives at risk and I knew about it, I’d have to do all I could to stop it.
To answer your question though, no, you cannot have agreed to something just because someone has your SSN. You are entitled to compensation for your work. You could likely force NE and AK to give you compensation for your work and it sounds like that would come to a large sum. But you don’t have to decide right now. With a little luck and a little work, they’ll be stopped anyway.
And now, I have to get back to the “little work” part of this.
#513
Originally Posted by r0cky
oh, and by the way, a few weeks ago he let me know that i was not actually an employee or partner or whatever else as he had stated many times. in fact, i was merely registered as "webdesigner" so if he wants to blame me for his not taking the time to do things correctly, good luck. surely the "owner" of a business knows far more than a wee little webdesigner does.
So why do you believe ANYTHING this person says?
#514
It is kind of funny and sad at the same time how he can't decide on what your position was. If you were a manger/owner/partner, then that raises your status and gives everything you say more weight. If you were none of the above and just an employee, then that puts more pressure on him for not paying his employees.
Poor guy.
Poor guy.
#515
spblat, yeah i have to say i am not of the lying type, but i knew that if i came to that crazy sob with the safety issue reason for a refund i may not have seen my $400 ever again. the only way to deal with liars is by lying to them. i wasn't about to kiss away that money for this loser and his company.
#516
Pick one or all three and act on it to help other people avoid what people have gone through or worse and copy this to other forums.
USCPSC (US Consumer Product Safety Commission) Report unsafe products hotline:
1-800-638-2772 or info@cpsc.gov
Please fill this simple complaint form with the FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (FTC) to expedite matters as well.
CLICK-FTC COMPLAINT FORM
NHTSA Dept of Transportation investigation:
Michael J. Jordan (202)493-0576
NE is located in Washington state
Ryan Cloud and Anthony Krueger are the owners
"Dear Consumer:
...The Privacy Act prohibits our agency from identifying you to the manufacturer without your permission... Any information is entirely voluntary. There is no consequence or penalty of any kind if you do not wish to provide it... " - DOT/NHTSA
USCPSC (US Consumer Product Safety Commission) Report unsafe products hotline:
1-800-638-2772 or info@cpsc.gov
Please fill this simple complaint form with the FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (FTC) to expedite matters as well.
CLICK-FTC COMPLAINT FORM
NHTSA Dept of Transportation investigation:
Michael J. Jordan (202)493-0576
NE is located in Washington state
Ryan Cloud and Anthony Krueger are the owners
"Dear Consumer:
...The Privacy Act prohibits our agency from identifying you to the manufacturer without your permission... Any information is entirely voluntary. There is no consequence or penalty of any kind if you do not wish to provide it... " - DOT/NHTSA
#517
Originally Posted by hre814
spblat, yeah i have to say i am not of the lying type, but i knew that if i came to that crazy sob with the safety issue reason for a refund i may not have seen my $400 ever again. the only way to deal with liars is by lying to them. i wasn't about to kiss away that money for this loser and his company.
#518
All the pictures are still of their old sliders though. You would think that if "The new and redesigned NE sliders are shipping in the next couple days", they would be able to update their site with new pictures.
More likely though, they know that as soon as people see pictures, they're going to be analyzed pixel by pixel and every little flaw will be revealed. And, judging from NE's attempts at design and fabrication so far, I would expect a lot of flaws.
Part of me also wonders whether they have already gone out of business and are just goofing around trying to mess with the people who have been so critical of them.
More likely though, they know that as soon as people see pictures, they're going to be analyzed pixel by pixel and every little flaw will be revealed. And, judging from NE's attempts at design and fabrication so far, I would expect a lot of flaws.
Part of me also wonders whether they have already gone out of business and are just goofing around trying to mess with the people who have been so critical of them.
#520
Thank you Tracy.
BTW, did you ever get your new lift installed? If so, did you have a chance to examine the NE spacer you said was cracking?
BTW, did you ever get your new lift installed? If so, did you have a chance to examine the NE spacer you said was cracking?


