3.4 swap started
#681
Intake temps are essentially the same as ambient according to my OBD-II reader, I have no idea what my CDT is but it probably isn't too bad since it's relatively cold here...
Last edited by mastacox; May 28, 2008 at 03:12 PM.
#682
So I looked at rpms today on the way to work, I about 2075 rpm at 65mph, and about 2400 rpms at 75mph. So the calculations based on the transmission ratios seem to be correct.
Just for fun, I whipped up a graph comparing engine/vehicle speed and 4.30 vs 5.29 gears. Seems about right, subject to some slight tire diameter error.
Just for fun, I whipped up a graph comparing engine/vehicle speed and 4.30 vs 5.29 gears. Seems about right, subject to some slight tire diameter error.
#683
So I looked at rpms today on the way to work, I about 2075 rpm at 65mph, and about 2400 rpms at 75mph. So the calculations based on the transmission ratios seem to be correct.
Just for fun, I whipped up a graph comparing engine/vehicle speed and 4.30 vs 5.29 gears. Seems about right, subject to some slight tire diameter error.
Just for fun, I whipped up a graph comparing engine/vehicle speed and 4.30 vs 5.29 gears. Seems about right, subject to some slight tire diameter error.
Why did you stop the graph at 100mph, lets see what your top speed would be at redline, LOL.
#684
LOL, here ya go Dale. At 5500 rpm in 4th gear, I'd be doing 177 mph. Fortunately, my tires explode at 122 mph, and the speed limiter kicks in at what, 102?
You should definitely shift out of O/D if you want to pass with authority.
You should definitely shift out of O/D if you want to pass with authority.
#685
Wow, about 145mph for me. I guess I'm not geared too low then, LOL. Can you image 33" mud tires going 145mph, I wonder if they ever hit that in the Baja 1000.
#687
#688
And yeah i have heard there is a way around it, depending on price i might do that just for when i dyno it as the speed limiter kicks in at about 5000 RPM and there is still 1k rpm to go. We will see.
#689
BFGoodrich Baja T/A's are "T" speed rated, 124mph. I doubt trophy trucks get up past 110 miles per hour much in the Baja.
Originally Posted by OffRoad.com
[37" Baja T/A]...highest in the industry 124mph "T" speed rating, it pulls as much as a 30mph safety margin over the competition...
...It takes a tough tire to run for 30 minutes at 140mph across a 120 degree dry lake bed. And this is toughness that is built into every Baja T/A.
...It takes a tough tire to run for 30 minutes at 140mph across a 120 degree dry lake bed. And this is toughness that is built into every Baja T/A.
Last edited by mastacox; May 29, 2008 at 10:28 AM.
#691
That may be the only way I'll ever hit 109mph, sitting on a dyno, LOL.
#692
So Dale have you determined if you have a narrow-band O2 sensor or a wideband O2 sensor yet? I hear URD is working with SplitSecond on a new ESC unit that will work "perfectly" with Toyotas that have narrowband sensors, I may have to look into getting one...
#694
I still run in open loop a lot just cruising down the highway. Most of the time its just slightly rich though, like around 13.9-14.2 area. Although I did have one little scare in the middle of my trip cruising along about 65mpg, very low throttle and I see my A/F like around 11 and dropping. I was like WTF??? I let off the gas and coasted then went back to speed and everything was fine after that, it never did it again. Maybe it freaked out like yours huh?
Last edited by mt_goat; May 29, 2008 at 10:48 AM.
#696
Yeah, "tricking" our engines into doing what we want is always an imperfect science...
I still want to look into an SMT7 to replace my FTC1. The SMT7 uses wideband O2 input for tuning, so your fuel map is a bunch of AFR values rather than fuel trims. You just tell it the AFR to aim for and it does what it needs to get there I guess. Sounds pretty frickin' sick, and it has two hot-swappable maps so you could run agressive and conservative maps. In theory it also can control a 7th injector, so I might be able to use it to control a W/MI kit as well...
I still want to look into an SMT7 to replace my FTC1. The SMT7 uses wideband O2 input for tuning, so your fuel map is a bunch of AFR values rather than fuel trims. You just tell it the AFR to aim for and it does what it needs to get there I guess. Sounds pretty frickin' sick, and it has two hot-swappable maps so you could run agressive and conservative maps. In theory it also can control a 7th injector, so I might be able to use it to control a W/MI kit as well...
#697
Yeah, "tricking" our engines into doing what we want is always an imperfect science...
I still want to look into an SMT7 to replace my FTC1. The SMT7 uses wideband O2 input for tuning, so your fuel map is a bunch of AFR values rather than fuel trims. You just tell it the AFR to aim for and it does what it needs to get there I guess. Sounds pretty frickin' sick, and it has two hot-swappable maps so you could run agressive and conservative maps. In theory it also can control a 7th injector, so I might be able to use it to control a W/MI kit as well...
I still want to look into an SMT7 to replace my FTC1. The SMT7 uses wideband O2 input for tuning, so your fuel map is a bunch of AFR values rather than fuel trims. You just tell it the AFR to aim for and it does what it needs to get there I guess. Sounds pretty frickin' sick, and it has two hot-swappable maps so you could run agressive and conservative maps. In theory it also can control a 7th injector, so I might be able to use it to control a W/MI kit as well...
#698
#699
I do think I'm going to get an SMT7 rather than go full data acquisition however, since they both would cost about the same (actually data acquisition would be more $$$) and are both to try and solve the same problem- easier tuning with the possibility of upgrades later on. Supposedly you can get a base-level standalone engine management kit from Megasquirt for close to the price of an SMT7, but going standalone would be biting off a lot more that I would want to chew I think...
#700
I made a support bracket for the down pipe today. There have been a few guys having problems cracking the crossover so I wanted to help support it and hopefully avoid that problem. Toyota has the down pipe supported in this area from the factory so maybe they know best. In fact I made this bracket from an old factory bracket.
Last edited by mt_goat; Jun 30, 2008 at 06:30 PM.



