Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Post your GAS MILEAGE!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 02:00 PM
  #1521  
Hellvision251's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield, CA
92 pickup 3.0 V6 31" tires. 14-15 Mpg only running on 5 cylinders.... hopefully will be better when thats fixed
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 06:21 PM
  #1522  
BuzzardsGottaEat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 153
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by ThatGuy1295
For some weird reseon people think they can get above 22mpg in their 4wd trucks. There arent any 4wd trucks that get over 22 mpg.
That's a pretty blanket statement ha define truck.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 06:36 PM
  #1523  
ThatGuy1295's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 6
From: 46 50' 36.82'' N 122 19' 41.01'' W
That's a pretty blanket statement ha define truck.
They have a cab usually in which you sit in, and a bed in which to haul stuff in. They make really small ones, and ones that are big enough to move a caterpillar D9 which weighs 108,000 lbs.

Either way you wont find one thats gets over 22mpg that is also 4WD and runs on gasoline. Atleast not stock anyways.


Ok? Ever really try to get everything you can? There's tricks to maintaining fuel mileage. Spend a little time with a hypermiler. Most people may do their math a little incorrectly. Let them get 30. You enjoy your 22, and don't sweat it. I can get over 22 mpg in my 4x4 truck, but not 30. Not with accurate math, anyway. But I'm dead stock. On stock equivalent tires. And with a wacky speedo, so I run GPS miles. So why don't you contribute by helping the 30mpg club do their math? Or just read, and enjoy their story?[
I do enjoy fiction lots. Its just that I thought this site wasn't about hilariously distorted facts? Am I in the wrong place??
Look its ok if somone wants to believe their driving a 1993 futuristic rocket ship that runs off a baryllium sphere, but dont mislead others. And for god saks go argue with a bunch of engineers and product testers, and the government if you think your vehicle gets better mpg then the people who built it do..

Last edited by ThatGuy1295; Jan 10, 2013 at 06:49 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 06:38 PM
  #1524  
ThatGuy1295's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 6
From: 46 50' 36.82'' N 122 19' 41.01'' W
92 pickup 3.0 V6 31" tires. 14-15 Mpg only running on 5 cylinders....
Thats pretty good considering.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 05:24 AM
  #1525  
BuzzardsGottaEat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 153
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by ThatGuy1295

Either way you wont find one thats gets over 22mpg that is also 4WD and runs on gasoline. Atleast not stock anyways.
I agree with you to a great extent. There are people who take extreme measures with their driving techniques and hypermilers that get higher than that with stock trucks as well as those with gas mileage friendly mods that can (barely, but can) pull outside the 22 mark.

But stock form, with normal driving, in normal everyday condition I believe you are correct.

For example, I track my mileage very closely (I am not stock, you can check out my build if you want, but I do have mods that help a bit with mileage) and was averaging about 21.7 all summer (18 so far this winter).

That said, I have 32s on and a little extra weight with my topper, camping gear, and recovery gear, etc. So I do think I could easily pull that up by 0.3 mpg or more by simply shedding weight and driving less agressive. (In the summer only, mind you. I'm being realistic.)

So your statement may be true of stock trucks driving in normal ways.
But ecomodders/hypermilers and people with gas mileage conscience mods can easily get 22+

(I don't want to go back and forth on the internet ha just pointing out that saying no truck ever with 4x4 can get 22+ mpg is a blanket statement that has some validity, but is not entirely true.)
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 06:19 AM
  #1526  
DG 1994's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
94 pickup 22re 31-11.5-15 super swamper tsl bias ply 5 speed about 12-14 mpg
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 06:56 PM
  #1527  
ThatGuy1295's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 6
From: 46 50' 36.82'' N 122 19' 41.01'' W
That said, I have 32s on and a little extra weight with my topper, camping gear, and recovery gear, etc. So I do think I could easily pull that up by 0.3 mpg or more by simply shedding weight and driving less agressive. (In the summer only, mind you. I'm being realistic.)
If anything vehicles tend to get less mpg in the summer hot air vs. cold air.

Last edited by ThatGuy1295; Jan 11, 2013 at 06:58 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 07:03 PM
  #1528  
combatcarl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 1
From: Springfield, Orygun
Yeah, but in places that run winterized fuel blends, your mileage sucks all winter. Summer blends have fewer dewatering agents and additives. That's how I understand it.

Sent from my iPhone using YotaTech
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 07:06 PM
  #1529  
ThatGuy1295's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 6
From: 46 50' 36.82'' N 122 19' 41.01'' W
Yeah, but in places that run winterized fuel blends, your mileage sucks all winter. Summer blends have fewer dewatering agents and additives. That's how I understand it.
Ya thats true.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 06:45 PM
  #1530  
BuzzardsGottaEat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 153
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by ThatGuy1295
If anything vehicles tend to get less mpg in the summer hot air vs. cold air.
This statement couldn't be more wrong haha
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 08:17 AM
  #1531  
ThatGuy1295's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 6
From: 46 50' 36.82'' N 122 19' 41.01'' W
This statement couldn't be more wrong haha
haha why? haha
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 10:04 AM
  #1532  
BuzzardsGottaEat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 153
Likes: 1
Vehicles get better gas mileage in a hot climate, or in the summer vs winter.

hot air vs. cold air

cold air will net you a few more ponies, but the downsides are far too many for the extra horse or two to net a gain.
cold air = power
hot air = mpg

There are many ecomodders and hypermilers that run a Hot air intake as well as a grill dam either year around or just in the winter in order to get warmer start ups and keep the air temp warm as possible. They lose some power, but gain FE.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 12:11 PM
  #1533  
combatcarl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 1
From: Springfield, Orygun
Huh. I didn't know that. Makes sense. The hotter you get, the leaner you get to a point. I think I remember that right?

Sent from my iPhone using YotaTech
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 12:41 PM
  #1534  
BuzzardsGottaEat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 153
Likes: 1
It is a very small gain, but if you add up many things that net very small gains you get a decent one.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 02:08 PM
  #1535  
ThatGuy1295's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 6
From: 46 50' 36.82'' N 122 19' 41.01'' W
Vehicles get better gas mileage in a hot climate, or in the summer vs winter.

hot air vs. cold air

cold air will net you a few more ponies, but the downsides are far too many for the extra horse or two to net a gain.
cold air = power
hot air = mpg

There are many ecomodders and hypermilers that run a Hot air intake as well as a grill dam either year around or just in the winter in order to get warmer start ups and keep the air temp warm as possible. They lose some power, but gain FE.
__________________
Ya thats yesterdays mpg fad. Todays is that it doesnt seem to offer any difference in mpg, or more so "a grain of salt". Theres more then a handfull of threads on this that can explain better then I can. Like this one for instance: Read the whole thing not just the first part.
http://www.metrompg.com/posts/wai-test.htm
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 02:27 PM
  #1536  
BuzzardsGottaEat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 153
Likes: 1
Point is, summer = better mpg than winter.

And it's not impossible to get 22+, difficult, but not impossible at all, even with 4x4
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 02:30 PM
  #1537  
ThatGuy1295's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 6
From: 46 50' 36.82'' N 122 19' 41.01'' W
And these:

http://www.focusfanatics.com/forum/s...d.php?t=270360

So will a clogged air filter yield better mpg's??


And heres all the reseons you might get better mpgs in warmer weather, but it doesnt mention anything about the air going into the motor.
http://www.topspeedracer.com/better-...an-winter.html

And we all know the famous cold air intake.


Last edited by ThatGuy1295; Jan 13, 2013 at 02:32 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 02:40 PM
  #1538  
ThatGuy1295's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 6
From: 46 50' 36.82'' N 122 19' 41.01'' W
Point is, summer = better mpg than winter.
Any way back to the Mpg thread.

Its kinda weird my mpg hasnt changed ever. Went from TB spacer, to no spacer, no deck plate, to deck plate, then added a heat shield between the radiator and the deck plate. Summer, winter, spring, fall, winter solstice, full moon, DST, solar eclipse. No change.

Only thing that did change mine was tire sizes and gearing. Oh and pulling my 3500lbs camping trailer makes it go from 18-19 to 14 or less mpg go figure...

Last edited by ThatGuy1295; Jan 13, 2013 at 02:54 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 02:50 PM
  #1539  
Teuf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,592
Likes: 24
From: Dixon, Ca
Good point ThatGuy.......... there are to many variables to get an immediate mpg increase. My CAI intake is bling and noise.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 02:50 PM
  #1540  
combatcarl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 1
From: Springfield, Orygun
That's cuz you gots a 3.0!

Sent from my iPhone using YotaTech
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:29 AM.