Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

LSVP question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 03:37 PM
  #1  
JEBSR5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: TN native stuck in AL
LSVP question

OOPS, mean LSPV

Here's my theory.

Recently replaced rear wheel oil seal a few months ago and inspected brake shoes while there. Figured with 210k, they gotta be worn. Well, they look like they got about half their pad or more left, wow after 210K? They are the originals.

Here is my theory.

After years of sagging in the back, then maybe the LSVP needs to be adjusted to compensate. Well how about just replacing rear springs instead and that should raise it back to the correct adjustment.

I figure after sagging, all the brake bias has shifted to the front with little brake pressure to rear. The sag in back i not real bad as some I have seen, but it's down a little. Front seems high to me, though. I haven't taken any measurments, anyone know what they would be? I assume the best way to measure is between bump stops.

What do you think, my theory sound?

Last edited by JEBSR5; Mar 2, 2007 at 03:43 PM. Reason: wrong abbreviati9on
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 03:47 PM
  #2  
Tdubbs05's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 341
Likes: 3
From: Los Altos, CA (Flagstaff, AZ for college)
i actually had this exact same question/theory when i redid my rear suspension w/ the downey hd kit. the kit actually came with a lsvp bracket extended but since then i haven't been able to lock up my rear brake. someone told me that you have to have weight in the back to get the rear to sag a little, which opens the lsvp and allow the rear brakes to be applied, but i haven't been able to test it. even then i'm thinking i'd need a lot of weight in the back to bring down the down HD springs. The only thing i can thing of is adjusting the lsvp bar's height and see what happens. anyone else agree w/ that?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 03:54 PM
  #3  
JEBSR5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: TN native stuck in AL
Originally Posted by Tdubbs05
i actually had this exact same question/theory when i redid my rear suspension w/ the downey hd kit. the kit actually came with a lsvp bracket extended but since then i haven't been able to lock up my rear brake. someone told me that you have to have weight in the back to get the rear to sag a little, which opens the lsvp and allow the rear brakes to be applied, but i haven't been able to test it. even then i'm thinking i'd need a lot of weight in the back to bring down the down HD springs. The only thing i can thing of is adjusting the lsvp bar's height and see what happens. anyone else agree w/ that?

Actually, I thought the more weight you put in back the more brake bias went to the front. I may have it backwards and if so, then that shoots my theory in the foot.


The reason I posted is that noticed when wet and turning with brake on, I have to be careful as too much brake makes front slide while turning and braking. This has gradually got worse. Tires got plenty of tread.

Last edited by JEBSR5; Mar 2, 2007 at 03:57 PM. Reason: Clarification
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 04:06 PM
  #4  
ChickenLover's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,583
Likes: 1
From: NV
The rear brakes are supposedly 'self adjusting.' In reality, they aren't. They need to be tightened up manually once or twice a year.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 04:07 PM
  #5  
Tdubbs05's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 341
Likes: 3
From: Los Altos, CA (Flagstaff, AZ for college)
well the reason i thought i made sense that you need weight in the back was to help the car brake...you don't want ur front brakes doing everything when you're hauling something. and if you've got no weight in the back you don't want your rear brakes locking up and taking you for a ride.

but as much as that makes sense to me, don't quote me on it.

i haven't done much driving in the rain/snow/ice recently and i'm never hard on my brakes so i've never really noticed that, but it sounds like i'd definitely look into getting that lsvp adjusted to give the rear drums a little action. plus you could get a little rear anti-lock action...
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 04:08 PM
  #6  
jibs187's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
I'm not positive, but I believe the sagging would actually add pressure to the rear brakes. Same idea as a loaded down rear end. I recently added a 4" lift all around and I'm still trying to get my LSVP exactly right. As far as the front goes, from everything thing I've read over the years, if you measure from the top of a 15" rim to the fender it should be approx 13.5" - 14" for stock. If you've got wide tires it may bow out that measurement a little, but that's essentially where you want to be.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 04:15 PM
  #7  
JEBSR5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: TN native stuck in AL
Originally Posted by Tdubbs05
well the reason i thought i made sense that you need weight in the back was to help the car brake...you don't want ur front brakes doing everything when you're hauling something. and if you've got no weight in the back you don't want your rear brakes locking up and taking you for a ride.

but as much as that makes sense to me, don't quote me on it.

i haven't done much driving in the rain/snow/ice recently and i'm never hard on my brakes so i've never really noticed that, but it sounds like i'd definitely look into getting that lsvp adjusted to give the rear drums a little action. plus you could get a little rear anti-lock action...
That makes sense to me now that you explained it, but curious as to why the increase in front braking due to sag? HMMMM.



ChickenLover

I already tried that, I don't think any auto adjust brake mechanism ever works as you think it should. I suppose it depends on how many times you back up to kick them up.

Adjusted those each year as per my maintenace list for yearly to do's.


Another note:

Also started to notice if getting on brakes hard, there definately is a slight tire squeal in the front, no lock up though. So, I'm getting a lot of bias to the front.

All lines and fluids changed and air free. No change after flush.

Last edited by JEBSR5; Mar 2, 2007 at 04:17 PM. Reason: additional notes
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 04:25 PM
  #8  
Tdubbs05's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 341
Likes: 3
From: Los Altos, CA (Flagstaff, AZ for college)
good point about the sagging... you know what we need is someone to play with the bar height this weekend and see what works.

i'd be down to do it, but my runners in the shop...damn headgasket...
any takers?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 04:47 PM
  #9  
JEBSR5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: TN native stuck in AL
Originally Posted by jibs187
I'm not positive, but I believe the sagging would actually add pressure to the rear brakes. Same idea as a loaded down rear end. I recently added a 4" lift all around and I'm still trying to get my LSVP exactly right. As far as the front goes, from everything thing I've read over the years, if you measure from the top of a 15" rim to the fender it should be approx 13.5" - 14" for stock. If you've got wide tires it may bow out that measurement a little, but that's essentially where you want to be.
By that method I have 14" in the front and 11 1/2" in the rear. With 15" rims and with Michelin LTX 10.50 x 30, I think.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 05:15 PM
  #10  
Jdizzydub's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
From: Lake Stevens, Washington
I read somewhere on this forum that you could drive in reverse down a hill or coast?..less than ten mph or so and engage the ebrake several times and this adjusts the brakes in the rear, granted that they are drum brakes. I did that after changing out leaking axle seals and shoes and it seems that they adjusted fine.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lectric80
Other Makes Cars/Trucks
0
Aug 11, 2015 12:02 AM
makemusic116
03+ 4Runner/GX470, & 05+ Tacomas
0
Aug 2, 2015 05:23 PM
makemusic116
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
Aug 2, 2015 04:40 AM
TJWilly
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
6
Jul 31, 2015 02:05 PM
4Runnin2000
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
Jul 29, 2015 06:09 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:53 PM.