63s or stock
#1
63s or stock
My friend recentily picked up a 83 single cab 22r sfa. He wants to put 63s on the front and back, dont get me wrong. im sure the 63s all around have much more flex, but for the work involved to do the swap. would new stock ones work just about as well, also i spent about an hour searchin for a thread thats has a 63 swap for the front that already has leafs and not the ifs swap. thanx in advance
#2
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,692
Likes: 58
From: Marysville, WA
63" springs in the front are WAY too long in my opinion. They work great in the rear however.
I am running 59" Allpro springs, and they are plenty long and plenty flexy. The reason most people use the 63" waggy springs is because they are cheap, and can be found easily in wrecking yards.
I am running 59" Allpro springs, and they are plenty long and plenty flexy. The reason most people use the 63" waggy springs is because they are cheap, and can be found easily in wrecking yards.
#3
x2 chevys are great for the rear as a cheap spring but for the front they are kinda long. i'm runnin the waggy 4044 or whatever the number is in the front and they flex good. chevy rear and waggy front is the ultimate budget setup imo
Trending Topics
#9
^3's in the rear and could do chevy 54's in front. Other wise take the stock rear packs and combine a few leafs from the front in to em and run those for your front and they'll do great. Lot of ppl like ranger rear springs up front as well.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
justdifferentials
Vendors Build-Ups (Build-Up Section)
14
Jun 11, 2017 08:36 PM
FS[PacNorWest]: 1993 4 Runner, V6, 4wd, Auto,
AkitaDog
Vehicles - Trailers (Complete)
0
Sep 3, 2015 09:01 PM






