Maximize Stock IFS Travel?
#1
Other than disconnecting the swaybar, Any tips here? I was pondering as I looked at my bumpstops, It looks like I've only got about 1.5 inches up and 1.5 inches down at the bumpstops (I know it's more when it gets out to the wheel) Has anyone replaced/ shaved their bumpstops for increased travel from their stock IFS? Would this be asking for early balljoint and CV failure? Are their any other ways? I like the idea of the jd fab/ total chaos kits, but $wow$ I'm running Rancho 5000's now at stock mounting points. It's a really stiff ride, not that makes a difference one way or the other.
#3
I've been running low profile compression bumpstops with shaved extension bumpstops, and no anti-sway bars for a long time without any problems. It makes a difference and every little bit helps.
#5
Originally Posted by az4x4runner
every little bit helps.
#6
The lo-pro bumps are usually a harder (urethane) compound than the stock (rubber) ones. I would think that you want the point of contact to come later but the end point to stay about the same so I'd say if you are going to trim the stockers only take a little bit off. The stockers have a softer feel though and I prefer them over urethane.
#7
Seems like I read a theory in one of these spacer threads that it was good to use a low profile stop for upward travel but to leave the stocks for down travel to protect CV's. Sound right?
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by BLKNBLU
Seems like I read a theory in one of these spacer threads that it was good to use a low profile stop for upward travel but to leave the stocks for down travel to protect CV's. Sound right?
#10
I can see why you definitely want the bump stop to limit droop, I guess having the shock or cv stop your downward travel would be a bad thing.
So will using Ball joint spacers make the 1.5" lift a necessity, or will they just give me 1.5" more travel and let me set the ride height wherever I want with the t-bars? Sounds like the most travel one can get from stock a-arms is a ball joint spacer + low profile bump stops, correct? I'm assuming if this is done longer travel shocks would also be beneficial.
So will using Ball joint spacers make the 1.5" lift a necessity, or will they just give me 1.5" more travel and let me set the ride height wherever I want with the t-bars? Sounds like the most travel one can get from stock a-arms is a ball joint spacer + low profile bump stops, correct? I'm assuming if this is done longer travel shocks would also be beneficial.
#12
Originally Posted by ChickenLover
Very true. Do you see any benefit in running lo pro bump stops as opposed to just taking a sawzall to all of the stockers (compression and extension)?
#13
I have been using low profile compression and extension stops for the last 4 or 5 years, 65k miles and God only knows how much wheeling.
I have destroyed 4 CV's in that time. Only one was related to presumed over extension.
Get the stops, it will open things up a little bit.
I have destroyed 4 CV's in that time. Only one was related to presumed over extension.
Get the stops, it will open things up a little bit.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flying91
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
45
Apr 11, 2024 04:39 PM
Jcrawl94
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
10
Oct 24, 2015 04:34 PM
coffey50
Offroad Tech
17
Jul 28, 2015 10:55 AM





