Offroad Tech Discussion pertaining to additions or questions which improve off-road ability, recovery and safety, such as suspension, body lifts, lockers etc
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

BFG A/T'S worst tire I have tried yet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 07:42 PM
  #141  
toy_tek's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 9
From: Phoenix, AZ
Just spotted this Vermejo's thread: Isn't this an MT/R?

Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 07:47 PM
  #142  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
Any tire can be victim to a sidewall tear,it's just how much it can withstand;if the problem isn't widespread than it's not an issue.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 08:21 PM
  #143  
muddpigg's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,374
Likes: 37
From: Enterprise, AL
Originally Posted by AxleIke
The ATs are just fine in serious stuff. Just not mud. I have severely used mine. They've held up fine and done extremely well.
Not saying they can't, but keep in mind that conditions are variable, ie: The south east has a mud/clay we call bull tallid (sp?) its slick and sticky. You need wide voids and horsepower.

Now here in the north west the mud is like a suspension of water and dirt, loose and not very slick.

Originally Posted by FredTJ
Neither of those two BFG's do real well out here (S. Arizona), in the "serious" stuff (read: big rocks, often really sharp). Their sidewalls rip easy (compare to some of the other rubber available).
MT/R's for me when the current AT's wear out (which is very soon now). No more hydroplaning for me....



Fred

BFG doesnt make the only MT, I run Destination MT, check them out before you commit to MTR, as they had a lot of good qualities and I got a hell of a deal on line. They wound up being a little over half of what Firestone wants for them with roadside hazard.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 01:45 AM
  #144  
William's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 336
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, New Mexico
Originally Posted by 111db
I have yet to encounter a situation out here where my tire selection (BFG A/T) was my sole limiting factor.
I totally agree. Anytime my forward progress came to a halt, it was due to more than one factor (ruts too deep, incline too steep, hung up on something, was driving too slow, etc.) and not just the tread pattern.

In '06, I went to Moab for vacation. I had totalled my 4wd 2 weeks before my vacation was to start, so I had to drive my 2wd '95 F150 with 31" BFG A/Ts. Needless to say, I didn't rock crawl. But that truck with those tires did take me places while exploring that I never would have thought it would.

Having to go to Moab without a 4wd really did suck, however. That's like having a donut without cream filling...
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 05:54 AM
  #145  
xcmountain80's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: Jupiter, FL
While I will never buy BFG AT's again it wasn't because they weren't tough. I had 3 pairs and had to replace them before they were worn out. I would always end up with 1 that was out of round of square if you will. Since then I replace my road/ light offroad tires with Nitto Terr Grappallers and have been extremely happy. Don't get me wron they tires are tough and seemed impervious to penetration.


Aaron
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 07:48 AM
  #146  
country_wheeler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Originally Posted by FredTJ
Neither of those two BFG's do real well out here (S. Arizona), in the "serious" stuff (read: big rocks, often really sharp). Their sidewalls rip easy (compare to some of the other rubber available).
MT/R's for me when the current AT's wear out (which is very soon now). No more hydroplaning for me....




Fred
Have you checked out the new BFG MT? I doubt the sidewalls have changed much if any, but I certainly wouldn't think it to be equal to the old MT. Its worth a shot in my opinion.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 08:57 AM
  #147  
AxleIke's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 6
From: Arvada, Colorado
Originally Posted by muddpigg
Not saying they can't, but keep in mind that conditions are variable, ie: The south east has a mud/clay we call bull tallid (sp?) its slick and sticky. You need wide voids and horsepower.

Now here in the north west the mud is like a suspension of water and dirt, loose and not very slick.




BFG doesnt make the only MT, I run Destination MT, check them out before you commit to MTR, as they had a lot of good qualities and I got a hell of a deal on line. They wound up being a little over half of what Firestone wants for them with roadside hazard.
Well, as I said in my post, EXCEPT MUD.

Fred feels that they don't handle rocks well. I think any tire will blow sidewalls, but when I finally get down to AZ, I will see.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 10:14 AM
  #148  
dirtoyboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,377
Likes: 2
From: St. Loser, Misery
I run my BFGs at 100 PSI..they work fawesome!
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 11:05 AM
  #149  
TOYOTA 1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 3
From: oregon
haha your full of hot air! lol
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 05:29 PM
  #150  
FredTJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ USA Age:60
Originally Posted by 111db
Just spotted this Vermejo's thread: Isn't this an MT/R?

Yup, that's an MT/R.
Obvious, any tire can get it's sidewall ripped. I have a photo that I could probably find of a ripped sidewall on a SX.

Now, having said that, no one, in the group that we normally run with, uses BFG's MT's or AT's anymore. The BFG's were, by far, the ones with the greatest number of ripped sidewalls, followed by the SSR's ...
Not only that, they (especially the MT's, though it helps to sip the heck on of 'em) won't hold a line on the rocks for anything. Same for the SSR's.
Most everyone now uses MT/R's.
Aired down correctly, they stick like glue.
At this moment in time, for the type of wheeling the I do, the MT/R's are simply the best for the buck.
Better on road ride than the BFG MT's (and yes I've run both of 'em on my vehicle).
Anyway, for me, it's MT/R's, period.
Much better where we wheel, better on road ride. MUCH stronger sidewalls for what we do.





Fred
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2008 | 11:24 PM
  #151  
schmitty_686's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: missoula, MT and Kalama, Wa
maybe it because your rigs so low to the ground your diff is dragging something fierce in 6inches of snow. and of course they arent going to be good in the mud thats why bfg makes a mud terrain. these all terrains go better in the snow than any other that i have seen. as others have said i guess its an opinion thing but its hard to argue with results.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2008 | 11:32 PM
  #152  
schmitty_686's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: missoula, MT and Kalama, Wa
that was about the very first post in this thread....sorry
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 12:27 PM
  #153  
Crawdad's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
I've had two sets of BFG AT's, both in 31x10.50 size, both on 16" wheels. They were good tires on the road, and okay tires offroad. Did great in gravel, trail riding (ie, stumps, roots, rocks, and other trail debris). They slicked up and clogged real quick in the mud, but they're not a mud tire. Did alright on the rocks.

Would I buy another set again? Yes, if I had a daily driver that I wanted to be able to run the trails on the weekend. No, if it was going on a trail rig.

A tire that is good for one person is not good for another. We all ask for and expect different things from our vehicles and tires. The BFG ATs perform well for what they are - an all-terrain tire that is compromised to do two things moderately well. They're not for hardcore mudding or rock crawling, but I sure as heck wouldn't/couldn't take my bias-ply TSLs on a 500 mile road trip, doing 70mph all the way.
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 08:52 AM
  #154  
4rnr's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
From: Plainfield, IL
havent read this thread and dont plan on it. I shake my head everytime I see it and the only reason I clicked on it is bc I cant beleive its gone 7 pages.

Well I guess you got the attention that you were obviously so badly craving.

Thats the only explination for someone posting a thread with a title like this one about one of the most legendary tires in history before thinking maybe its me, and not the tire.
Reply
Old May 21, 2008 | 12:38 PM
  #155  
hmmwv15's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,801
Likes: 0
From: Good 'ole Georgia
They are great in everything but mud. They fill up and it's like you have racing slicks. More pedal when going through mud solves that problem though....sometimes...
Reply
Old May 21, 2008 | 12:57 PM
  #156  
1stgen4gunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 809
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut
my bfgA/t's are the best tires I've ever had.
Reply
Old May 21, 2008 | 04:05 PM
  #157  
FredTJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ USA Age:60
Originally Posted by 1stgen4gunner
my bfgA/t's are the best tires I've ever had.
- In what ways ?
- What other similar tires have you had ?






Fred
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 02:51 PM
  #158  
foskco87's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Victoria, BC
You should really try the BFG Mud terrains, they are basically the same as the all terrains except way more meat on them and they haul ass!! Look through the galleries and like half of the toyotas will have BFG MT's.
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 03:34 PM
  #159  
CC_yota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: ATX/ Waco
How do tires haul ass exactly?

And the M/T is nothing like the A/T. If it were, why would BFG make 2 different tires instead of just one and save some money?
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 05:53 PM
  #160  
William's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 336
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, New Mexico
Originally Posted by CC_yota
And the M/T is nothing like the A/T. If it were, why would BFG make 2 different tires instead of just one and save some money?
He said, "basically the same as the all terrains except way more meat on them".

Same carcass, but with a different tread design and deeper tread depth. He never said that they are alike.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:53 PM.