95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

sway bar options?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 03:17 PM
  #1  
kev93p-up's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo, Texas
sway bar options?

Lately I've noticed my runner acting a little skittish on small abrupt bumps on the highway. Today I realized that my right hand sway bar link is broken. I figure this is not helping my handeling issue along with worn out shocks. The truck is stock as it sits but I'm about to get some OME springs and shocks all around. Is there a better alternative to the factory sway bar set up that may complemint the OME set up?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 04:20 PM
  #2  
4Crawler's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 34
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Factory sway bar is fine, or I imagine there are stiffer bars available aftermarket, Sway-A-Way, Addco, etc.

Or, just get some new end-links the proper length for the lift you'll be putting on:

http://www.4crawler.com/4x4/CheapTri...#DisconnectsV2
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 06:19 PM
  #3  
Tofer's Avatar
Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 6
From: Puyallup WA.
the other thing you can do its yank them out completely, i've ran NO sway bars for a while with out a problem, including smashing through mountain curvie roads.... you'll get better flex with out them too.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 06:39 PM
  #4  
ASU4runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: Blowing Rock, NC
yeah no sway bars isn't too bad if you're off the pavement a good bit. I live in the mountains and it's actually kind of fun driving on the winding mountain roads with them off, but on the highway at 65+ it gets a little tricky. You really need to keep a good hand on the wheel and hope that you dont have to make any emergency maneuvers.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 07:04 PM
  #5  
ebelen1's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
From: Socal
Originally Posted by ASU4runner
yeah no sway bars isn't too bad if you're off the pavement a good bit. I live in the mountains and it's actually kind of fun driving on the winding mountain roads with them off, but on the highway at 65+ it gets a little tricky. You really need to keep a good hand on the wheel and hope that you dont have to make any emergency maneuvers.
I always wondered how people drive w/o sway bars if they do a lot of on-road driving. The stock ones don't seem that great when you're going over 70 mph b/c I still feel body roll. I'm actually upgrading to Addco's pretty soon.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 08:43 PM
  #6  
kev93p-up's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo, Texas
I didn't even think about needing more length on the sway bar link with the added spring height. Am I correct in thinking that the sway bar end should be level with the lower control arm?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 09:03 PM
  #7  
4Crawler's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 34
From: SF Bay Area, CA
You bet, generally you want the ends of the sway bar to be sitting horizontal at rest. Why? Drive hard around a turn and one side of the bar is pushed up, one side pulls up on the opposite side of the suspension. If you start out horizontal on the end, the up and down angles are the same, so you get equal forces on the bar and suspension. If, for example you lifted the suspension and left the bar hanging down at some angle and went around the same corner, the one side would push the end of the bar up, closer to horizontal. The other side would be pulled down farther by the opposing suspension arm. With the near horizontal end, it would have the full leverage effect on the sway bar since the cosine of 90 degrees is 1.0. However the end of the bar that is down at some angle, would have a lesser amount of leverage, reduced by the cosine of it's angle. So this imbalance would result in the bar needing to be twisted farther to resist the cornering force, more twist = more lean in the vehicle or a less efficient sway bar. For example, assume the bar was down at 15 degrees due to the lift and in a turn it was twisted 15 up and down. That would leave the up side at 0 degrees (i.e. horizontal) and the down side down at 30 degrees. At a 30 degree angle the efective length of the end of the bar is now only 86.6% what is was when level (i.e. cos(30)=0.866). So that side can only provide 86% of the roll resistance as it could when level.

A good lift kit should have available a properly sized end-link replacement for the sway bars. Same thing with an LSPV bracket for the rear axle.

Last edited by 4Crawler; Oct 8, 2005 at 09:18 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 10:25 PM
  #8  
kev93p-up's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo, Texas
Thanks for the info!! I'll keep it all in mind when I order everything!
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 05:22 AM
  #9  
waskillywabbit's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by 4Crawler
You bet, generally you want the ends of the sway bar to be sitting horizontal at rest. Why? Drive hard around a turn and one side of the bar is pushed up, one side pulls up on the opposite side of the suspension. If you start out horizontal on the end, the up and down angles are the same, so you get equal forces on the bar and suspension. If, for example you lifted the suspension and left the bar hanging down at some angle and went around the same corner, the one side would push the end of the bar up, closer to horizontal. The other side would be pulled down farther by the opposing suspension arm. With the near horizontal end, it would have the full leverage effect on the sway bar since the cosine of 90 degrees is 1.0. However the end of the bar that is down at some angle, would have a lesser amount of leverage, reduced by the cosine of it's angle. So this imbalance would result in the bar needing to be twisted farther to resist the cornering force, more twist = more lean in the vehicle or a less efficient sway bar. For example, assume the bar was down at 15 degrees due to the lift and in a turn it was twisted 15 up and down. That would leave the up side at 0 degrees (i.e. horizontal) and the down side down at 30 degrees. At a 30 degree angle the efective length of the end of the bar is now only 86.6% what is was when level (i.e. cos(30)=0.866). So that side can only provide 86% of the roll resistance as it could when level.

A good lift kit should have available a properly sized end-link replacement for the sway bars. Same thing with an LSPV bracket for the rear axle.



Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 09:59 AM
  #10  
ebelen1's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
From: Socal
Originally Posted by 4Crawler
You bet, generally you want the ends of the sway bar to be sitting horizontal at rest. Why? Drive hard around a turn and one side of the bar is pushed up, one side pulls up on the opposite side of the suspension. If you start out horizontal on the end, the up and down angles are the same, so you get equal forces on the bar and suspension. If, for example you lifted the suspension and left the bar hanging down at some angle and went around the same corner, the one side would push the end of the bar up, closer to horizontal. The other side would be pulled down farther by the opposing suspension arm. With the near horizontal end, it would have the full leverage effect on the sway bar since the cosine of 90 degrees is 1.0. However the end of the bar that is down at some angle, would have a lesser amount of leverage, reduced by the cosine of it's angle. So this imbalance would result in the bar needing to be twisted farther to resist the cornering force, more twist = more lean in the vehicle or a less efficient sway bar. For example, assume the bar was down at 15 degrees due to the lift and in a turn it was twisted 15 up and down. That would leave the up side at 0 degrees (i.e. horizontal) and the down side down at 30 degrees. At a 30 degree angle the efective length of the end of the bar is now only 86.6% what is was when level (i.e. cos(30)=0.866). So that side can only provide 86% of the roll resistance as it could when level.

A good lift kit should have available a properly sized end-link replacement for the sway bars. Same thing with an LSPV bracket for the rear axle.
WOW!!!! True engineering knowledge is pretty powerful even if I barely get it...
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 10:49 AM
  #11  
4Crawler's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 34
From: SF Bay Area, CA
I added a sketch:



and a description on the web page:

http://www.4crawler.com/4x4/CheapTri...#DisconnectsV2
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 11:12 AM
  #12  
Tofer's Avatar
Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 6
From: Puyallup WA.
thanks for reminding why i hated statics so much.... lol jk, it wasnt that bad of a class
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 11:30 AM
  #13  
MTL_4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 3
From: Montreal, QC Canada
Originally Posted by ToferUOP
thanks for reminding why i hated statics so much.... lol jk, it wasnt that bad of a class
I was a TA in statics so no prob there......it was dynamics I hated.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ladybugRC
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
458
Aug 21, 2020 10:41 AM
Obmi
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
51
Oct 4, 2015 11:30 AM
Thamuel_
Domestic Swaps
1
Oct 3, 2015 11:15 AM
JookUpVandetti
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
10
Sep 30, 2015 08:58 AM
oldblue
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
0
Sep 28, 2015 04:07 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:34 PM.