95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

!!Speedy's Supercharger Thread!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 9, 2007 | 07:34 AM
  #241  
mastacox's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 2
From: Fort Worth, TX
Originally Posted by Greedy
I had the same symptoms plus some. After my ecu would dump fuel like you described while in part-throttle boost, it would keep dumping it even after I got back into vacuum. Just a slight blip of the throttle would cause me to dive down into the 10's. Then, as I would come to a stop, I would lean way out and stall. This would happen consistently with the esc hooked up. As soon as I bypassed it back to stock, everything ran perfect (except for being at 14.7:1 in part throttle of course).
Yeah that sounds very similar to what's happening to me. It doesn't happen all of the time, only rarely and usually the ECU figures things back out if I take it easy on the throttle for a little bit. Still, PITA when it happens and I'm trying to get up a hill without fouling my oxygen sensors and cat.

It's very possible things are not working as perfectly as I would like to think... I was operating under the impression these symptoms were a result of not having a very smooth tune around the area the ESC kicks in.

Last edited by mastacox; May 9, 2007 at 07:36 AM.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 08:06 AM
  #242  
mastacox's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 2
From: Fort Worth, TX
Originally Posted by mt_goat
Is the ECU still in closed loop when that happens?
I haven't been able to catch the problem with my laptop hooked up yet, but I suspect no. As far as i can tell the ECU goes into freak-out open loop and dumps in too much fuel. It's a very strange symptom because if the fuel trim was zero the AFR would be 14.7 (assuming I got the values on my fuel map right) but going down to 9.0 suggests to me that the ECU starts dumping in as much fuel as it can (+20%).
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 08:10 AM
  #243  
mt_goat's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 5
From: Oklahoma State
Originally Posted by mastacox
I haven't been able to catch the problem with my laptop hooked up yet, but I suspect no. As far as i can tell the ECU goes into freak-out open loop and dumps in too much fuel. It's a very strange symptom because if the fuel trim was zero the AFR would be 14.7 (assuming I got the values on my fuel map right) but going down to 9.0 suggests to me that the ECU starts dumping in as much fuel as it can (+20%).
Yeah check that out, mine will go into open loop at what seems like about 50% throttle sometimes.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 08:14 AM
  #244  
Speedy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by mt_goat
Hey start your own thread! Oops it is your thread Does your sender have 1 or 2 wires going to it? If 1 then yes, you need a ground. I think my sender block might have enough room to drill and tap a small hole for a very small screw. I got it at Ace Hardware




Or maybe you could wrap the ground wire around the threads and solder and wrap it with tape and a zip tie?
My sender has two wires going to it. A black and a purple. The wires are about 8 feet long and have a plug on the other end of them than snap into the gauge.

I actually had one of those T fitting in my hands at ACE yesterday. It would have to be a VERY small screw and I'm not sure something that small would provide a good enough ground. That's when I got the idea of welding or soldering on a nut on the flat side and connecting up there.

Last edited by Speedy; May 9, 2007 at 08:16 AM.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 08:34 AM
  #245  
Speedy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by mt_goat
Yeah check that out, mine will go into open loop at what seems like about 50% throttle sometimes.
I know the products are similar, but aren't you using the new AFR Calibrator? That's different from the ESC-1 correct?

I've talked to several people over on CT that have the newer AFR Calibrator and have had it for a year or so and report things work as expected.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 08:37 AM
  #246  
Speedy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Here are the instructions to the gauge I have:

http://www.autometer.com/productPDF/0596A.pdf

Note the two wires coming from the sender.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 08:59 AM
  #247  
mt_goat's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 5
From: Oklahoma State
Originally Posted by Speedy
Here are the instructions to the gauge I have:

http://www.autometer.com/productPDF/0596A.pdf

Note the two wires coming from the sender.
Hmmm...my guess is your 2nd wire is a ground and you don't need another one then. I'd try it without another ground and see if it works, mine (Isspro gauge) has 2 wires too and doesn't need another ground.

Yeah mine is called an A/F ratio sensor calibrator:
http://www.urdusa.com/product_info.p..._id=1230100028 I think the only difference is the WB sensor vs NB sensor.

Last edited by mt_goat; May 9, 2007 at 09:00 AM.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 09:04 AM
  #248  
Speedy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by mt_goat
Hmmm...my guess is your 2nd wire is a ground and you don't need another one then. I'd try it without another ground and see if it works, mine (Isspro gauge) has 2 wires too and doesn't need another ground.

Yeah mine is called an A/F ratio sensor calibrator:
http://www.urdusa.com/product_info.p..._id=1230100028 I think the only difference is the WB sensor vs NB sensor.
I only see one wire in the picture you attached. Where's the other? I'm curious if they're the same design.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 09:11 AM
  #249  
mt_goat's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 5
From: Oklahoma State
Originally Posted by Speedy
I only see one wire in the picture you attached. Where's the other? I'm curious if they're the same design.
Yeah its behind that one wire, it's hidden by the front wire in that pic.
Here's a better pic:

Last edited by mt_goat; May 9, 2007 at 09:27 AM.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 09:29 AM
  #250  
Speedy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by mt_goat
Yeah its behind that one wire, it's hidden by the front wire in that pic.
Ok that's exactly how mine is then. Hopefully I don't need another ground wire.

I called Autometer again and got another guy saying I don't need to ground it. He told me I could drop the sender in a bucket of hot water if I wanted proof so I may do that. I told him that the other guys there seem pretty confused, but he said he's positive the sender doesn't need to be grounded. We'll see.

On a side note, I've made a ton of updates to the Project SportRunner website:

www.hooliganbiketech.net/sportrunner

My TrueTrac LSD is in as well. Just gotta make an appt to get it installed.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 09:46 AM
  #251  
Weasy2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, Canada
[QUOTE=Greedy;50522680]
Originally Posted by mastacox
What do you mean by "locking up of the O2"?

I seem to experience a sporadic symptom where the ECU gives up on reading the O2 sensor and just dumps fuel at about 9.0:1; but it happens only during engine warm-up or here or there when driving in part-throttle boost for long periods of time (like driving up a mountain)...[/QUOTE

I had the same symptoms plus some. After my ecu would dump fuel like you described while in part-throttle boost, it would keep dumping it even after I got back into vacuum. Just a slight blip of the throttle would cause me to dive down into the 10's. Then, as I would come to a stop, I would lean way out and stall. This would happen consistently with the esc hooked up. As soon as I bypassed it back to stock, everything ran perfect (except for being at 14.7:1 in part throttle of course).
If you have a OBD-II Scanner you will notice that when that is happening the ecu goes OPEN - CLOSED - OPEN - CLOSED....so you are right it does give up due to the awkward readings from the ESC1/O2 sensor. Newer vehicles would throw CEL but the older ones like 96-99 wont (some do its hard to tell).

I am about to install a second SMT6 to run the closed loop system...until the SMT7 arrives and it will do both. I have also a plan to use some o2 simulators, relays and the smt6 (or people can use a pressure sensor) to make my own esc1..
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 09:55 AM
  #252  
Speedy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by mt_goat
Yeah its behind that one wire, it's hidden by the front wire in that pic.
Here's a better pic:
I just looked through about 200 of your pics. That was a major project you undertook. It looks like a VERY clean implementation. I've seen other engine swap projects that were worked, but looked butchered.

How'd you learn to do all that? I'm a decent mechanic, but that's WAY over my head.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 10:06 AM
  #253  
mt_goat's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 5
From: Oklahoma State
Originally Posted by Speedy
I just looked through about 200 of your pics. That was a major project you undertook. It looks like a VERY clean implementation. I've seen other engine swap projects that were worked, but looked butchered.

How'd you learn to do all that? I'm a decent mechanic, but that's WAY over my head.
A ME degree and experience as a mechanical engineer doesn't hurt any.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 10:08 AM
  #254  
Speedy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by mt_goat
A ME degree and experience as a mechanical engineer doesn't hurt any.
HAha, well there ya go. I have an Industrial Technology degree myself but the emphasis was Computer Engineering.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 10:30 AM
  #255  
mt_goat's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 5
From: Oklahoma State
Originally Posted by Speedy
HAha, well there ya go. I have an Industrial Technology degree myself but the emphasis was Computer Engineering.
The search button was also a big help hehe.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 11:30 AM
  #256  
mastacox's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 2
From: Fort Worth, TX
Originally Posted by Weasy2k
If you have a OBD-II Scanner you will notice that when that is happening the ecu goes OPEN - CLOSED - OPEN - CLOSED....so you are right it does give up due to the awkward readings from the ESC1/O2 sensor. Newer vehicles would throw CEL but the older ones like 96-99 wont (some do its hard to tell).

I am about to install a second SMT6 to run the closed loop system...until the SMT7 arrives and it will do both. I have also a plan to use some o2 simulators, relays and the smt6 (or people can use a pressure sensor) to make my own esc1..
So how do you know the engine won't do the same thing with your own implementation as it does with the ESC1?
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 12:00 PM
  #257  
Weasy2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, Canada
because the smt6 can control open loop via the maf or closed loop via lambda control all it does is tell the ecu what it wants to know (that its around 14.7:1) but really the afr is different as you tune it.

What the ESC1 does is trick the ecu into thinking that it is in OPEN loop so you can tune it via the maf, this is what causes the ecu to get confused.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 12:09 PM
  #258  
mastacox's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 2
From: Fort Worth, TX
Originally Posted by Weasy2k
What the ESC1 does is trick the ecu into thinking that it is in OPEN loop so you can tune it via the maf, this is what causes the ecu to get confused.
As far as I know, the ESC1 just puts out a 14.7:1 signal (0.5V IIRC) to make the ECU think that the mixture is stoich. There is no way to tell the ECU it is in Open Loop, it decides that on its own. The whole purpose of an oxygen sensor clamp is to make the ECU think the mixture is 14.7:1, so that any fuel changes made are not seen by the ECU.

I suspect the problem is related to either the ECU not believing the O2 sensor's signal because it sees a perfect mixture but is getting readings elsewhere that make it think something is wrong (like at the TPS sensor). That, or maybe the voltage is not consistent enough (or too consistent) and the ECU doesn't "believe" its reading.

I believe that the ESC1 is a shoddy implementation of the oxygen sensor fake-out idea (and perhaps the FTC1-E as well), but it definitely DOESN'T make the ECU think it's in open loop.

Last edited by mastacox; May 9, 2007 at 12:10 PM.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 03:32 PM
  #259  
midiwall's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 9,048
Likes: 2
From: Seattleish, WA
Originally Posted by mastacox
As far as I know, the ESC1 just puts out a 14.7:1 signal (0.5V IIRC) to make the ECU think that the mixture is stoich.
Steve (Gadget) has an interesting view on this point. Bottom line, I agree with you.


There is no way to tell the ECU it is in Open Loop, it decides that on its own.
Correctomundo!


I believe that the ESC1 is a shoddy implementation of the oxygen sensor fake-out idea (and perhaps the FTC1-E as well), but it definitely DOESN'T make the ECU think it's in open loop.
Yeah... $30 worth of parts for $200 retail and it still doesn't work.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 06:08 PM
  #260  
Weasy2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, Canada
The ESC1 does affect wither the engine is in open or closed loop...Mark even you should have seen this(or maybe i just did )...
Using the scanner you will SEE when the ECU is in open or closed it says right on the screen. As SOON as you hit the ESC1 setpoint (what is it...something like 1-2psi?) the screen changes from CLOSED to OPEN. Remove the ESC1 and goto the SAME pressure/throttle point and the screen will read CLOSED. The problem i see with the ESC1 is that it goes into OPEN loop like it is supposed to but after a short period of time (0-80mph accel at 3-4psi) it will start going closed-open-open-closed-open and the afr goes screwy....so yes the ESC1 does make it go into open loop.
Thats what confuses me about the whole thing...and of course you can tell the ecu to go into open loop when you want it to...just manipulate it To bad us AUTO guys cant do this


Or im just on crack.....i dunno...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:50 PM.