95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners
View Poll Results: Whats the mileage of your 3.4L without a rebuild or HG?
Less than 100K
55
23.71%
101K to 120K
36
15.52%
121K to 140K
38
16.38%
141K to 160K
38
16.38%
161K to 180K
16
6.90%
181K to 200K
17
7.33%
201K to 220K
14
6.03%
221K to 240K
4
1.72%
241K to 260K
1
0.43%
260K and beyond
13
5.60%
Voters: 232. You may not vote on this poll

Longevity Poll: Mileage of a 3.4L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 06:14 PM
  #1  
colsoncj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 2
From: Monett, MO (Springfield)
Longevity Poll: Mileage of a 3.4L

I'm looking at adding a 98 Limited Runner to the family, and interested in everyone's mileage. Please poll it up how many miles your un-molested 3.4L's have made it without headgaskets, bearings, etc. (timing belt changes are excluded).
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 06:17 PM
  #2  
91_4x4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Ought to have a poll or something.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 06:18 PM
  #3  
colsoncj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 2
From: Monett, MO (Springfield)
sorry, you must have posted right as i was setting the limits for the poll. man you were fast
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 06:26 PM
  #4  
seanz0rz's Avatar
Guest
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
From: Cal Poly Pomona or Redlands, CA
i have a tick over 140 right now, so by the end of next month, 141k. PO took really good care of her, and i do too in the 3k ive put on her since august.

only thing replaced to my knowledge is the h2o pump and timing belt. runs great, no leaks, plenty of power (relatively speaking). great engine!
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 06:31 PM
  #5  
colsoncj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 2
From: Monett, MO (Springfield)
Thanks for the info! Any things to look out for, common problems with 3rd gen runners or 3.4L's? (besides normal stuff such as t-belt/h2o pump changes)? Also I've heard 3.4L's like to get dirty throttle bodies or MAF... any truth to it and plausible reasons for it?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 06:34 PM
  #6  
colsoncj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 2
From: Monett, MO (Springfield)
BTW: truck I'm looking at is a 1998 Limited Blk/Tan with the E-Locker, all the options I know of (PW, PL, PM, P sunroof, P antenna :-(, leather, CD, cruise....) It has 165K on it, tires are ok, condition is great, but t-belt change is uncertain. I've got him to 7500 for it so far, may be able to go to 7000.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 06:37 PM
  #7  
wjwerdna's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 2
From: Novi, MI
so far 82k, but nothing at all wrong yet
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 06:39 PM
  #8  
colsoncj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 2
From: Monett, MO (Springfield)
Sweet! Who voted 260K and beyond? Any secrets or just normal toyota?

Most of this stems from a 3.0 burning my mom at 120K. (no comp in #6).... It was a well maintained motor (by me) and driven with the utmost respect (by her), and still failed. I trust 22RE like no other, mine has 250Kish on it and I beat the snot out of it every time I drive it. I've heard all the stories 3.4L's isnt a 3VZE so drop the worries, but I just wanted to hear from some fellow board members who can vouch for the drivetrain, or even the whole truck.

Last edited by colsoncj; Jan 30, 2007 at 06:42 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 06:42 PM
  #9  
20005spd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: bristol, ri
got 105k on mine. water pump was leaking when i bought it @ 96k as customary. I did the t belt and w pump which was easier than the crapy 3.0v6 i had.
besides the water pumps leaking due to paper gaskets from factory(now use metal gaskets) the 3.4 is a solid motor and makes great power and there are alot of mods that can be done. i would deff buy another 3rd gen 4runner.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 06:43 PM
  #10  
colsoncj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 2
From: Monett, MO (Springfield)
Originally Posted by 20005spd
got 105k on mine. water pump was leaking when i bought it @ 96k as customary. I did the t belt and w pump which was easier than the crapy 3.0v6 i had.
besides the water pumps leaking due to paper gaskets from factory(now use metal gaskets) the 3.4 is a solid motor and makes great power and there are alot of mods that can be done. i would deff buy another 3rd gen 4runner.
Thanks for the comments!
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 06:59 PM
  #11  
habanero's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,246
Likes: 497
From: mo
A little hard to judge.....mine has almost 150k on it so that's what I voted, but it doesn't mean that's when I had to do anything to it....so far so good, had a leaking waterpump that I changed with the timing belt and that's it so far.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 06:59 PM
  #12  
BeachRNR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: NY
I say thats a good deal for that 98. You will be happy.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 07:04 PM
  #13  
colsoncj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 2
From: Monett, MO (Springfield)
wjwerdna: You profile shows some wheeling at the mounds, doesnt it?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 07:05 PM
  #14  
colsoncj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 2
From: Monett, MO (Springfield)
Originally Posted by BeachRNR
I say thats a good deal for that 98. You will be happy.
THANKS! Thats what I kinda thought too!!!! I've always loved the looks, but never could afford one (back in the high school days when they were new).... now I can, woo hoo!!!!
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 07:36 PM
  #15  
91_4x4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by colsoncj
sorry, you must have posted right as i was setting the limits for the poll. man you were fast
Thanks
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 07:40 PM
  #16  
saulgoode's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Houston
171K and running like a champ!
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 09:19 PM
  #17  
One_96TR4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Likes: 1
From: Brampton, Ontario
I have 193, 000kms on my '96 which is about 120k miles and it's still running strong. I also had a buddy that had a '97 with 360,000kms which is about 224k miles and ran like new. His parents were the original owner and only did regular maintenance. These motors are solid IMO.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 09:45 PM
  #18  
Elton's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,261
Likes: 7
From: Siletz,Oregon
i got a little over 143k on mine t-belt and other stuff changed at 59k runs great has plenty of power and has 143k miles on the stock tranny fuild etc i plan on keeping my truck for a long time
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 09:47 PM
  #19  
KyleT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TEXAS
my 96 just turned 160k, my bros 98 is 200k, my moms 99 is 230k all v6's
mine had the HG recall done at 30K. the others have had nothing major done, and nothing done at all since they have owned them.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 09:49 PM
  #20  
User 051420's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
I sold my last 97 3.4 with 206k miles. Last I saw, it had 220k miles. Running fine.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:12 AM.