95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Dumb Idea??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 03:46 PM
  #1  
nigeltufnel3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Arrow Dumb Idea??

OK, so tell me if this is a stupid idea. I know there is a lot of debate that switching to syn oil is a bad idea on an old engine (and I know some people believe it's fine). But would I be alright to use a syn/dyno blend for the next couple changes, then after a while go pure syn? Let me know if this is an ok idea or if i'm retarted. Thanks for the info. :pat:
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 04:04 PM
  #2  
jimbo74's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,590
Likes: 0
From: Nor*Cal
its fine
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 05:08 PM
  #3  
gwhayduke's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 1
From: El Paso, TX
Listen to what Jim said. And also take a little advice from someone who switched to synthetic at 96,000...and now has 208,000. Go ahead and do it. I got 1 mpg better.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 09:57 PM
  #4  
Tacoma Dude's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,345
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
On an older engine with lots of mileage - would the change to synthetics be good right when the oil seals are replaced? Or should there be some wait time?
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 10:30 PM
  #5  
jimbo74's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,590
Likes: 0
From: Nor*Cal
its fine
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 10:36 PM
  #6  
Bob_98SR5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 5
From: Los Angeles
i say "it depends". if you let that engine go to hell, not change the oil frequently, poorly maintained, id say 'dont do it'. that way, if something bad happens to your engine because if its poor shape and things fail because of it, you wont be one of those people who bash synthetics later

seriously, i have never known anyone personally that has had a problem switching from dino to syn on a high mileage vehicle.

bob
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 02:44 AM
  #7  
foxtrapper's Avatar
Guest
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
The synthetic blends are a nice, underappreciated oil. You'll be fine.

Do be aware of your engine leaks. If you've got a slobbery engine, switching to synthetics will be expensive and messy.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 04:12 AM
  #8  
gwhayduke's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 1
From: El Paso, TX
Originally Posted by foxtrapper
Do be aware of your engine leaks. If you've got a slobbery engine, switching to synthetics will be expensive and messy.
If you have any leaks or seepage, or just want to clean out your engine, you might read the Auto RX threads and then decide for yourself. I'm about 400 miles into a treatment right now.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 07:54 AM
  #9  
SLC Punk's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,862
Likes: 0
From: SLC, UT
Originally Posted by Bob_98SR5

seriously, i have never known anyone personally that has had a problem switching from dino to syn on a high mileage vehicle.

bob
I have, but they were on the 4.0L Jeep engines (which leak oil anyways)


Try syn-blend and see if it starts to leak. If it is ok, then try syn and see if that leaks.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 07:57 AM
  #10  
havic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Queens, NY
I've been considering this change. I have a 98 4Runner 3.4L with 87,000 miles. I change the oil on schedule, and there are no apparent oil leaks. There just hasen't been enough convincing evidence to make me switch. I also wanted to switch my gear oil to synthetic as well, but I don't want any adverse effects. My car runs fine and I don't want to jepordize that. More good feedback about synthetics might push me to switch.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 08:02 AM
  #11  
SLC Punk's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,862
Likes: 0
From: SLC, UT
Originally Posted by havic
I've been considering this change. I have a 98 4Runner 3.4L with 87,000 miles. I change the oil on schedule, and there are no apparent oil leaks. There just hasen't been enough convincing evidence to make me switch. I also wanted to switch my gear oil to synthetic as well, but I don't want any adverse effects. My car runs fine and I don't want to jepordize that. More good feedback about synthetics might push me to switch.
Pfft, 87,000 miles is still a new engine (for a Toyota). You should be fine!
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 08:11 AM
  #12  
gwhayduke's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 1
From: El Paso, TX
Originally Posted by havic
There just hasen't been enough convincing evidence to make me switch. I also wanted to switch my gear oil to synthetic as well, but I don't want any adverse effects. My car runs fine and I don't want to jepordize that. More good feedback about synthetics might push me to switch.
Don't worry...Dino is good. And a Toyota on dino is gonna last a long time anyway.

But...

My '89 Corolla (with 256,000 miles) used to be my wife's car. Every now and then, I do an oil change with good dino oil run it for week...or two...or whatever, just to rinse some of the gunk out of the engine. I HATE Gunk's engine rinse (looks like kerosene). The first time I did one of these short changes, two or three days into the week, my wife comes home and says:
"I don't know what you did to my Corolla but I want you to put it back. It can't get out of it's own way."

She doesn't know what I do to the cars to maintain them. But she was right...On dino, the cars run good. On synthetic, they sing.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
o2raybid
Newbie Tech Section
16
Sep 4, 2015 12:45 PM
corey519
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
9
Aug 12, 2015 11:12 AM
KBar
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
Jul 13, 2015 06:01 PM
Cplmike
Newbie Tech Section
5
Jul 8, 2015 08:47 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:16 AM.