95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

3rd gen rear lift springs... on road comfort ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 10:27 AM
  #1  
nrgetic99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: VA
3rd gen rear lift springs... on road comfort ???

As I am now planning the lift on my 98, I want to get some feedback on rear lift springs. I had the Downey 3.5" (2.5" actual lift) rear springs with Bilstein rear shocks and found it a bit firm for day to day on road use. It may be a killer set up with better valved shocks.

I plan on using OME n86 in back whatever combination I go with.

So, my options are Downey, OME or spacers on stock springs.

I am not really considering the LC coils and shocks at this time as I really do not think I need that much lift.

Many thanks in advance

David
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 10:28 AM
  #2  
bflooks's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
From: boston, ma
i love the 891s on mine.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 10:35 AM
  #3  
nrgetic99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by bflooks
i love the 891s on mine.
Rear lift was a real 2.5 " ???

Thanks

David
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 10:38 AM
  #4  
User 051420's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
I got a full 3"+ of lift from my 891's. Of course, they settled to a steady 2.5" after a year or so. IMO, they're a bit stiff but are great for carrying a heavy load or towing.

Bamachem tried them out, but quickly went back to his Downey's for a better ride.

I bet you'll like them with the OME shock.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 10:39 AM
  #5  
noodle's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: PA
I have the Downey 3.5" - 2.5" actually springs and OME N86 shock and I love it. It's definitely firm and I use mine as a daily driver and I cover about 200+ miles a week. I don't mind it.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 10:40 AM
  #6  
bflooks's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
From: boston, ma
i am a little over the 2.5", but as stated, they will end up being right there.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 10:44 AM
  #7  
Localmotion's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
david

I am running the tundra set up minus the spacer up front

The omes gave me around 2.5

You can drive my junk if you'd like. let me know whenever.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 10:45 AM
  #8  
FilthyRich's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, Va
OME--ride well on-raod and flex well too

you might want to take MAtt up on his offer. His truck is awesome
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 10:47 AM
  #9  
Localmotion's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by FilthyRich
OME--ride well on-raod and flex well too

you might want to take MAtt up on his offer. His truck is awesome
just gotta mind the squeeking. My dash loves to rattle!!!!
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 11:10 AM
  #10  
bamachem's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
Downey or re-use the stock springs, but add some spacers for height and some air bags for adjustable ride stiffness.

Last edited by bamachem; Apr 17, 2006 at 11:13 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 11:27 AM
  #11  
nrgetic99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by bamachem
Downey or re-use the stock springs, but add some spacers for height and some air bags for adjustable ride stiffness.
Andy,

Do you just sit around and create really good responses and store them for when you need them

That is a great idea. Best of all worlds.

Does seem to me that this 98 Ltd is waaay softer and less controlled than my 99 Sport 'Highlander"

David
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 11:54 AM
  #12  
ebelen1's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
From: Socal
891's ride more stable at lower speeds than the spacers I had. The extra height though gives me more tippiness than before at higher speeds. BTW, I have Bilstein HD's in the rear.

History: My rear w/ a Revtek spacer sat about 1 1/2" lower than the front. I wanted a slight rake and the 891's made up the 1 1/2" difference perfectly. It also looks to have a very slight rake even though front and rear are even. The only thing that I've noticed is less stability on turns in the road on the highway. It could be that I have tires w/ less tread on the front but I think it's the extra height.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 05:13 PM
  #13  
MTL_4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 3
From: Montreal, QC Canada
Originally Posted by ebelen1
891's ride more stable at lower speeds than the spacers I had. The extra height though gives me more tippiness than before at higher speeds. BTW, I have Bilstein HD's in the rear.

History: My rear w/ a Revtek spacer sat about 1 1/2" lower than the front. I wanted a slight rake and the 891's made up the 1 1/2" difference perfectly. It also looks to have a very slight rake even though front and rear are even. The only thing that I've noticed is less stability on turns in the road on the highway. It could be that I have tires w/ less tread on the front but I think it's the extra height.
I agree and I prefer my OMEs over any stock springs because the stock ones are just too soft IMHO unless you always are going to drive it around with the rear unloaded and forget about towing (airbags will help but will also need constant adjustment depending on the load). If you want alot of lift (3"+ range) and a plush ride then use the OEM Cruiser coils like many are using now with the OEM lift (not to be confused with OME). I debated many different combinations, but I just couldn't beat the OME lift in the 1.5" to 2" lift range (and I am very happy with how it looks/performs).

Almost any lift will feel a bit more tippy on highway turns unless you are using a stiff shock like a bilstein, but the performance may not be idea for offroad so pick your poison. Good way to get around this would be to use heavier sway bars such as those made by Addco.

Last edited by MTL_4runner; Apr 17, 2006 at 05:36 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 05:27 PM
  #14  
bamachem's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by nrgetic99
Andy,

Do you just sit around and create really good responses and store them for when you need them

That is a great idea. Best of all worlds.

Does seem to me that this 98 Ltd is waaay softer and less controlled than my 99 Sport 'Highlander"

David
... yeah, i've been waiting WEEKS to use that one!


it might be that the shocks are weaker or shot, maybe the 98 doesn't have the conical bumpstops... could be lots of things that are different... does the 98 have the conical bumpstops? if not, go to the dealer and get the recall done.

Last edited by bamachem; Apr 17, 2006 at 05:28 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 06:16 PM
  #15  
nrgetic99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by MTL_4runner
I agree and I prefer my OMEs over any stock springs because the stock ones are just too soft IMHO unless you always are going to drive it around with the rear unloaded and forget about towing (airbags will help but will also need constant adjustment depending on the load). If you want alot of lift (3"+ range) and a plush ride then use the OEM Cruiser coils like many are using now with the OEM lift (not to be confused with OME). I debated many different combinations, but I just couldn't beat the OME lift in the 1.5" to 2" lift range (and I am very happy with how it looks/performs).

Almost any lift will feel a bit more tippy on highway turns unless you are using a stiff shock like a bilstein, but the performance may not be idea for offroad so pick your poison. Good way to get around this would be to use heavier sway bars such as those made by Addco.
Funny you should mention Addco.

With my SC'd 99, just running a front Addco made a huge difference. I was at about 2" front (SAW's ) and 2.5" rear.(Downey '3.5') I did not go with an Addco rear sway bar as with the extra torque from the SC, you risk picking up a rear wheels and spinning off all the power with no LSD in back.

Anyway, it worked great and felt more stable than an unlifted truck to me.

David
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 07:20 PM
  #16  
ErikJeanna's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Newbury Park, CA
I have the Downey setup with Rancho adjustables in the rear... LOVE it! The Ranchos are currently set at 6 and they ride great. I just ordered new bumpstops from Sonoran Steel today and will install those as soon as they come in.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedRunner_87
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
84
Jun 1, 2021 01:51 PM
mskalmus
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
9
May 28, 2017 07:51 AM
jerusry
Axles - Suspensions - Tires - Wheels
1
Oct 19, 2015 05:28 PM
MTLroadierunner
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
0
Jul 6, 2015 12:17 PM
Vargntucson
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
Jul 4, 2015 12:15 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:24 PM.