Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

2000 Rear Coils and Shock Replacemnet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2011, 12:55 PM
  #61  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jbudhram015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SQRRRL
no track bar needed w/906. 890...yes

Is Sonoran Steel the only place to get one?
Old 01-30-2011, 01:59 PM
  #62  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
terminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SQRRRL
You can find the info on the DIY on this site.
Detailed pics and all.
I searched before I asked and didn't find what I was looking for. I can't find the DIY area.
Old 01-31-2011, 10:04 PM
  #63  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jbudhram015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So installing 890's not the same as 906's

Last edited by waskillywabbit; 07-03-2011 at 05:37 AM. Reason: Inappropriate Language.
Old 02-01-2011, 11:55 AM
  #64  
Registered User
 
SQRRRL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you plan to run 906 and 881. your truck will sit flat. with 890's you will have rake. (ass high) Do you want them or not?
Old 02-01-2011, 11:59 AM
  #65  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jbudhram015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SQRRRL
If you plan to run 906 and 881. your truck will sit flat. with 890's you will have rake. (ass high) Do you want them or not?
My comment is about how much more trouble I'm having installing the 890's than I had installing the 906's. Im sure the height on the 890's will be great, I have 881's in the front.
Old 02-01-2011, 01:15 PM
  #66  
Registered User
 
SQRRRL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have 880's w/5mm trim packers. about an 1/8 of ann inch lower than 881. cant see spending the$$$ for an 1/8 inch
send me a pic when you are done if you don't mind.
Old 02-01-2011, 01:29 PM
  #67  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jbudhram015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure what you're talking about with the front end bro. I went from a 906 in the rear to an 890. Already had the 881s....haven't changed them, they are great.
Old 03-08-2011, 05:19 PM
  #68  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jbudhram015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More Questions

Is anyone running 33's with the 881/890 OME combo? I was looking as the SS kit for the OME lifts because my truck is about paid off and I wanted to go to 33's. I'm having a hard time figuring out what else I'll have to change to make them work. I think they will fit now but I want them to function reasonably well on the trail. I have aftermarket wheels 16x8 with 4in backspace and I was hoping someone could let me know where they are rubbing with the OME lift. Here's the accessory kit BTW, anyone got it?

http://www.sonoransteel.com/index.ph...products_id=68

Was looking at a Falken Rocky Mountain ATS 285/75/16
Old 07-13-2011, 08:50 AM
  #69  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jbudhram015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Update

To wrap this thread up, I ended up with all OME stuff, its great. If you’re looking to replace your stock stuff and not lift, go OME 880/906, if you want to lift some go 881/890. The 882/891 combo is for a bumper set up. I also put The Sonoran Steel OME accessory kit on which gives you all the basic stuff you need to accommodate the additional height if you do go with the 881/890 set up and gives you an extra inch or so up front.

Im using the Nitrocharger shocks which I really like but aren’t the cheapest option. I don't know much about the Bilstein HD's but they seem to be an alternative. I would say throughout this whole process mixing and matching suspension components has been a bad idea so far IMO. After all the OME stuff I ended up buying I could have gone with a SS lift for a little more cash. That being said my truck rides great. Hope this helps.

Last edited by jbudhram015; 07-13-2011 at 08:52 AM.
Old 03-27-2016, 04:36 PM
  #70  
Registered User
 
TheOriginal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Parts numbers of the shocks

Hi1
Could you please let me know the complete parts numbers for the Bilstein 2450s and 2451s you have? Actually I have mounted 99 on the front and 906 on the rear but with the factory shocks, I will apreciate your help.

Thanks,
TheOriginal

Originally Posted by Batsoff
Hey Rapter...

Just to review, I'm running:

- 99 coils up front up with Bilstein 2450s
- 906 OME coils in the rear with Bilstein 2451s

The above set up has worked very well for me... and my truck is set up for the street. I'm about 30 mins outside of DC in Fairfax VA, and there aren't many places to wheel around here. My Runner is primarily set up for road trips, I travel up and down the east coast to see friends and family quite often (family is in NJ).

I love the handeling of the truck... I wouldn't run the 2450s or 2451s if I was gonna be off road a lot, I do think they are a stiff shock, if you search you'll see a lot of complaints regarding this. But for the street, they work very nice.

If I had to do it again, I'd go with this set up. I'm a daily lurker here and have seen all of the different set ups, but for the street, I feel the above combo hits the mark (granted the street is no where near as demanding as what this community does to their rigs). I originally looked at the 5100s, but the 245xs were a little cheaper and were more of what I wanted (a stiff/firm shock). If I were building an off road rig and cruising the desert on washboard roads, the 5100s would be on my list to consider.

The combo is a bit of a "franken-setup" with the OEM and OME coils, but I needed some extra carrying power in the back for hauling stuff around. The OEM coils didn't cut it.

If I'm not addressing any of your concerns with the set up, please let me know.

Just a quick Edit... I was always under the impression that the Trekmasters were a "soft" shock, that's the only reason I didn't go with that set up. I looked at the SS 3.0 for a long time, but wanted a stiffer shock for the highway, hence the HD 2450/2451.

-batsoff
Old 03-28-2016, 07:00 PM
  #71  
Registered User
 
TheOriginal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jrm
went with the 99 coils all the way round. The front 99s really improved the ride combined with the HDs. The rears though were kind of a let down so im planning on replacing um with some 906s.
Hi! Could you let me know which is your setup (coils and shocks part numbers)?
Thanks,
Old 03-29-2016, 04:59 PM
  #72  
Registered User
 
TheOriginal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok, I'm thinking one of the following configurations, please help me to choose the best 'm not thinking about off-road only on normal roads and highway. I will apreciate your recomendations and remember that I have instaled on my 4Runner 99 tall springs on the front and OME 906 on the rear:

Front shocks (all Bistein):
1)BIL BE5-D558-TO
or
2) 24-187244

Rear shocks (all Bilstein):
1) BIL 4R5100
or
2) 24-024518
or
3) BSN-24-249966
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
the1998sr5
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
15
07-14-2020 08:35 PM
Yotadawgjr
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
10
08-23-2015 10:51 AM
Avenged
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
4
07-09-2015 07:55 AM
Huntingtruckcletus
Other Makes Cars/Trucks
0
07-08-2015 05:26 PM
Vargntucson
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
07-04-2015 12:15 PM



Quick Reply: 2000 Rear Coils and Shock Replacemnet



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:51 PM.