Tires & Wheels Anything about tires and wheels

Yoko Geolander ATs??

Old Apr 5, 2005 | 09:59 PM
  #1  
jon_7248's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine TX
Yoko Geolander ATs??

Im still on the hunt for tires and have setteled to an agreement. I will be getting a A/T set right now (285/75x16) and then get some mud tires for my play set (probably 255/85x16). I have liked the Yoko ATs for some time but never could get much out of the board on experiances people have had with them. I like the 40k milage warrenty they offer. And the fact that they are cheaper than BFG by a little. Any one Run the Geolander ATs II?? Pics would be cool to!
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 10:39 PM
  #2  
jimbo74's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,590
Likes: 0
From: Nor*Cal
eh they are ok, the bfgs are much better... they dont last 40k they lie, and they are very soft, if you dotn rotate them every 1000 miles they will cup, badly... i used to work at a tire place, and we used to have to warranty the tires out as a manufacturers defect a lot, because of most people only rotate them every 5000 miles or more and the geolandars need to be religiously rotated every 1000 or so....
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 10:52 PM
  #3  
jon_7248's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine TX
is this for the new ATs II or the old ones. I know Yoko used to have a really soft compound for the ATs and MTs. But they say they have corrected that. hmm, wonder if I can get a few pairs of tires for the price of one thru this 40k warrenty. hmmm
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 06:18 AM
  #4  
jimbo74's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,590
Likes: 0
From: Nor*Cal
depeends where you go... the warranty wasnt the yoko warranty that came with the tires, it was the internal policy of the tire company to warranty the tires that wore out too fast, if the customer had an alignment done and their tires rotated at proper intervals and still ahd half the advertised life... however the company i owrked for would give the customers crap... it was about customer retention
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 06:49 AM
  #5  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
I had a set on my '97 and rotated them every 4k and no wear problems at all over 20k til I sold the truck. Also if you don't see 40k then you get your next set cheaper(this has been the case with all the tires I bought through Discount Tire). The BFGs are nice but as I've read and said before is the BFGs aren't that good in the rain at highway speeds,not really grippy on dry pavement and no treadwear warranty and while I love the look the BFGs don't suit my daily driving needs plus the cost is about $60 a tire more than the Yoks. Off road tho' the BFGs do the job and have stronger sidewalls than most common AT tires and that can be a big difference if you off road regularly.

Here's a link and a pic of the Geos http://discounttire.com/dtcs/findTir...46&rd=16&ar=75
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 10:06 PM
  #6  
bubbamango's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: LA
i have the AT+II on an '04 runner. i love them. so far, i like them better than the bfg's i had on my '90 xtracab. i know it's not quite the same comparison in vehicles, but they handle and ride better on and offroad. the bfg's are stronger in the sidewalls though.

the outer lugs are longer and help with cornering, while the lateral lugs in the middle really grip well to pull through. they self clean quite well. very sure-footed in rain and snow.

so far i have about 14,000 miles on them and not much wear yet.

hope this helps
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 10:49 PM
  #7  
jon_7248's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine TX
Got any pics?
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 06:43 AM
  #8  
expeditionswest's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Basecamp: Prescott, AZ
The AT II's are a good tire, and a more modern tread design than the BFG AT's. I had them my Trooper for about 10k mile and then sold them to a good friend of mine with a 2004 Tacoma.



They are a softer compound, which will wear out faster. However, a softer durometer will adhere and deform better to rock, improving traction. Remember the BFB Moab edition tires... The AT II's also have a more open tread patern on the shoulder for mud and snow. And good siping for wet and icy conditions. Overall I would rate them a great tire, though more proned to sidewall damage than a BFG.

For reference: I have owned about 7 sets of BFG AT's and 1 set of Yokohamas, and driven with both BFG AT's and the Yok' AT II's on the same vehicle

Last edited by expeditionswest; Apr 7, 2005 at 06:44 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 06:50 AM
  #9  
AgRunner06's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
From: The Lone Star State
expeditionswest,

Did you ever have any problems with cupping or wear with those tires? How often did you rotate them?

:bounce2:
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 07:28 AM
  #10  
expeditionswest's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Basecamp: Prescott, AZ
Originally Posted by AgRunner06
expeditionswest,

Did you ever have any problems with cupping or wear with those tires? How often did you rotate them?
I rotated them with every oil change, right at 5,000 miles. I would say that they have a higher wear rate than the BFG's. But you get better adhesion, so there is a performance advantage.

I have had BFG AT's go 50,000 miles and still have 30% tread left (on a light vehicle).

Oh, and one more comment that may help. Tearing:

The BFG, because of the harder rubber will tear if used aggressively. I have had complete side lugs rip off, and other sizeable chuncks of rubber tear from the AT's I have used. (this was a big issue with my Discovery II that had traction control).

Whereas the Yoko' AT II's are softer and will deform instead. BUT, they get a lot of small tears, smearing, etc.

Last edited by expeditionswest; Apr 7, 2005 at 07:33 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 08:13 AM
  #11  
sschaefer3's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,278
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
They'll go more places than you'll take them.

Lower Terminator:



Martinez, which Scott above blew his YJ's front axle out on.



Hammers in California



Rock Chucker in Moab

]

What more could you possibly want. Same 4 original tires.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 08:38 AM
  #12  
expeditionswest's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Basecamp: Prescott, AZ
Not many better endorsements than that...
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 08:41 AM
  #13  
AgRunner06's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
From: The Lone Star State
Originally Posted by expeditionswest
Not many better endorsements than that...
I would have to agree with that statement.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 11:22 AM
  #14  
s_wall98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville TN
That was a nice ad you posted Steve!! How many miles did you get outta them?
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 11:41 AM
  #15  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
Yeah,finally some props and a nice endorsement for the uncommon choice;it seems it's all about Revos around here for a cheap AT tire and while they're good the Yoks are a nice alternative and cheaper. I talked to a friend that had them on his Tacoma and he saw about 45k out of them but they saw alot of off road miles too. I'm still torn between another set of the Yoks or the TerraGrapplers but the Yoks are about $90 cheaper out the door.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 12:53 PM
  #16  
Praufet's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth/College Station, TX
I'd get them if the had more sizes available for a 17" wheel, but as it is I want a bigger tire than they offer. I may be going with a 16" wheel though since they are $60 cheaper per tire.

Last edited by Praufet; Apr 7, 2005 at 01:23 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 12:57 PM
  #17  
96LtdYota's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, Al... ROLL TIDE!!!
i love mine.. they have yet to let me down..

also dumb newby question... but what the heck is cupping, is that when the sidewall slightly deforms..
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 01:03 PM
  #18  
TRunner's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
I have never had a better tire, myself. Down here I get to take them in many mudpits as we don't have too many hills and rocks, and they fling mud like no tomorrow. I still have yet to get stuck and they have save my butt a couple times in wet weather. Though the BFG may get a little better wear, they cost a lot more and don't handle *ALL* terrains as well. Currently I don't think there is a better AT tire then the Yokos.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 01:09 PM
  #19  
sschaefer3's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,278
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
Originally Posted by 96LtdYota
i love mine.. they have yet to let me down..

also dumb newby question... but what the heck is cupping, is that when the sidewall slightly deforms..
You'll get your shirt today.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 01:12 PM
  #20  
Praufet's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth/College Station, TX
Tell them to make a bigger 17" tire. Like 285/70s, the biggest they have is a 275/65 which is equivalent to a 31, I want my 33s
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:13 PM.