General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related) If topic doesn't apply to Toyotas whatsoever, it should be in Off Topic
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Would you buy a diesel 4runner or truck?
Yes
639
91.03%
No
63
8.97%
Voters: 702. You may not vote on this poll

Would you buy a diesel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 25, 2007 | 08:30 AM
  #281  
harpen123's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Mooresville, NC but college at Auburn, AL
personally I love the smell and the smoke and the sound. It just screams power. Like hearing the whistle of the turbo's ohh man.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #282  
dropzone's Avatar
Fossilized
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 19,771
Likes: 456
From: PNW
If it was a US option I would have bought one...Have seen a ton of them overseas..diesel and a SA front end would be nice..
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 05:29 PM
  #283  
ken.vs.ryu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
fj cruiser diesel in all white please.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 05:41 PM
  #284  
rezrunner92's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 399
Likes: 1
From: South Carolina
I have been secretly wanting a diesel Toyota for a while now. Diesel engines have come a really long way in the last ten years. More reliable, more fuel efficient, more long term cost efficient (even with the higher parts cost for some things). You don't have to wait to crank if you have a block heater. I would very definitely have a diesel.

For all you loss of power complainers, two words, Propane Injection. Vroom Vroom!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 05:46 PM
  #285  
964runnerKY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: Paducah KY
yes I would like to get a 60 series in a diesel.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 06:25 PM
  #286  
frodin1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
From: NOW, Havasu!
A few replies back someone mentioned cheaper fuel? Right now Diesel is quite a bit more than reg fuel. And even with Biodeisel now on to the market, it's still more exspensive than reg diesel. Right know there's a couple stations in the Seattle area selling Bio and it's well over $3.00 a gallon. I dont ever think it'll be cheaper. Supply and demand. You really don't get that much better milage out of it either. Well, as far as the big trucks go. Ford was mentioned. Mine was getting about the same mileage as my neighbors Powerstroke. The benifit, was towing with the turbo. That was it.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 06:39 PM
  #287  
huskres's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
The reason why toyota diesels are quiet are because they make no where near the power of a domestic truck diesel. Ford, GM, and Dodge dont make the diesels that are in their trucks. Ive also seen guys get 24 mpg in a Ford 4 door 3/4 ton truck. I work at fedex and my 27 foot long truck gets about 13 combined and thats with stop and go traffic and a weight of about 15000 pounds.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 06:41 PM
  #288  
91_4x4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by frodin1
A few replies back someone mentioned cheaper fuel? Right now Diesel is quite a bit more than reg fuel. And even with Biodeisel now on to the market, it's still more exspensive than reg diesel. Right know there's a couple stations in the Seattle area selling Bio and it's well over $3.00 a gallon. I dont ever think it'll be cheaper. Supply and demand. You really don't get that much better milage out of it either. Well, as far as the big trucks go. Ford was mentioned. Mine was getting about the same mileage as my neighbors Powerstroke. The benifit, was towing with the turbo. That was it.
Diesel is about $2.30 down here, but let's put it in terms of usage. For the standard city driver, they don't need a Cummins TD or 7.3L Powerstroke. For farm use and towing, the diesel can't be beat.

The 5.9L Cummins TD (2001 model) produced 245 horsepower and 505 ft. lbs. torque. We've towed a tractor from our farm to town (100 miles doing 70-75) and still averaged 17mpg. On long highway trips, we averaged near 21 miles per gallon. No, it isn't stellar, but for its job, it suffices.

If/when Toyota produces another diesel, it'll probably be for economy (probably >3 liters displacement).

They're going to have to build an even bigger truck than the Tundra to compete with full-size trucks here now. A 5.7L V8 is a step in the right direction for the market.

(Far as I can tell, the new Tundra is competing with the F-150 and Nissan Titan, not 3/4 ton plus size trucks).

Last edited by 91_4x4runner; Feb 15, 2007 at 06:42 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 06:44 PM
  #289  
misterzee's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 684
Likes: 2
From: North Georgia
I had my fling with diesels... naw
back when diesel was .19/gal and gas was .25/gal it made sense, but now, its 2.60/gal and gas is 2.00/gal does not make sense; higher prices for repairs and maint, cost of fuel, lower power, more noise, dirt, mpg improvement is not enough. my two cents
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 06:49 PM
  #290  
91_4x4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
What do you mean by "lower power"?
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 06:51 PM
  #291  
frodin1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
From: NOW, Havasu!
I'd have to agree, you can't beat the power they get out of them, and if you dont mind changing 6 gallons of oil, the reliability of the engines I hear is real good.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 07:15 PM
  #292  
Ringmaster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
From: Spokane Valley Washington
Yes in a heart beat.
Why? MPG, Torque, Total mileage between overhaul gasser vs. diesel. 2 less pistons/cylinders, 8 less valves, etc.etc.

Plus let it idle in the driveway in summer months, keep the pesky Mosquitos away.

Last edited by Ringmaster; Feb 15, 2007 at 07:16 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 08:06 PM
  #293  
Hoopster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: kentucky
I'm a no voter because where I'm at diesel is quite a bit more per gallon, and they're worse for the atmosphere not to mention harder to start this time of year. I'll hold out for electric thank you.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 09:44 PM
  #294  
Bumpin' Yota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota, FL
Originally Posted by misterzee
I had my fling with diesels... naw
back when diesel was .19/gal and gas was .25/gal it made sense, but now, its 2.60/gal and gas is 2.00/gal does not make sense; higher prices for repairs and maint, cost of fuel, lower power, more noise, dirt, mpg improvement is not enough. my two cents
"lower power"??

Have you actually sat and driven any of the big 3's diesels lately? You wont find one that will make less than 570ftlbs of tq! ALL diesels for 2007 will be OVER 650ftlbs and 350hp!

Hell our 2006 6.0 powerstroke makes 325hp/570tq bone stock. That is sure as hell more powerful than their V10. Add a 4" straight exhaust, SCT extreme tune, and an AFE stage II intake, a 4x4 launch at the stock 27psi boost and you have a 3/4ton diesel truck tipping the scales at 7500lbs, that will pull high 13s in the 1/4 mile and stomp your mustang like the ricer it is! (btw ive done several 4x4 launches in our stock 6.0 - it, and any diesels like it, will rape ANYTHING out of the hole, 500ftlbs to the four tires at the launch with 100% traction has a way of launching pennies from the dash into your chest quite painfully..)

"more dirt?"

I think not. Just because you can see a little unburnt fuel from a diesel when they take off does NOT mean that it is more pollutant to the environment. Spark plug ingnited engines do not burn nearly as efficiently and will release 2x the amount of carbon monoxide that a diesel will. If you want to save the environment, buy a diesel!

"minimal mpg improvement"

Since diesels are meant to have LOTS of power we should compare them to their equivalents in the gas world. Lets compare the 6.6L duramax LBZ to the GM 8.1L. They both produce approximately 325-350hp. Unloaded the duramax will get around 19-25 pending loadout, gearing and speed driven. The 8.1, you will be LUCKY to get 12mpg under ANY conditions! Hook up to a 13,000lb gooseneck and the milage difference is exacerbated! 6.6 diesel is going to get about 10-17 pending drive speed load out and gearing. The 8.1? About 6mpg.

If you need power, the diesel is the most cost effective way to get it period.

Last edited by Bumpin' Yota; Feb 15, 2007 at 09:58 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 10:46 PM
  #295  
fork's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 949
Likes: 3
From: i ka moana
lower power? dirt? huh?

I wish my trucks were diesel
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2010 | 04:05 PM
  #296  
claybodie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
+1 for diesel trucks and +1 for electric cars.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2010 | 04:16 PM
  #297  
stormin94's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 4
From: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
Originally Posted by claybodie
+1 for diesel trucks and +1 for electric cars.
Electric is still 10+ years from being competitive in the market. They take too long to charge, battery technology is still limited, which in turn limits the range to about a third or less of a typical gasoline or diesel powered vehicle.

I would have a Toyota diesel, but on the condition that I imported one with a manual transmission, and not brand new. The newest I'd go would be about 5-8 years old.

Holy crap, this thread is 7 years old!!!
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2012 | 05:02 AM
  #298  
Les Swanson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Diesel owner

I have a 90 Dodge 1 ton with Cummins 5.9 12V. Can get 22mpg on highway. Oh so much torque. In the summer time I can burn Biodiesel,waste crankcase oil(clean and filtered) or mix of veggie oil.
!985 BJ70 nonturbo Hwy mileage not much better than Dodge, but it sure is cute.
2001 Golf TDI Best mileage 54MPG. Winter time usually 45 overall. I just burn #2 because it is computerized.
I have a few other vehicles with the IHC DT 466. It would be fun to have one in a conversion, but they probably weigh almost as much as the LC or Golf. They seem to be easy on fuel,and are long lived like the 3B or Mack Econodyne.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 03:31 PM
  #299  
ranchero's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Salida, CO
I have never bought a new car or truck. I am waiting for Toyota to offer a 4x4 turbodiesel truck with standard trans. If/when they do, I'll buy one.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 03:45 PM
  #300  
bob200587's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,546
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by jx94148
Heck yeah I would have gotten one.

More power, higher MPGs, cheaper fuel, no spark plugs or distributor to mess with are a few reasons off the top of my head. I'd be first in line to open up the exhaust and make it louder if it would gain performance. With the money saved on fuel i'd get a louder stereo to drown out the noise.

If all the pieces fell into place right now i'd ride my motorcycle to South America, buy an early 90s double cab, straight front axle, turbo diesel truck; load up the bike and drive it back home.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:25 AM.