General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related) If topic doesn't apply to Toyotas whatsoever, it should be in Off Topic
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

parabolic leaf springs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 10:53 AM
  #1  
Swansen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
parabolic leaf springs

I didn't know they existed, but they are the sweetness.

http://www.parabolicsuspension.com/general.htm
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 10:56 AM
  #2  
Ed H.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Oakley Ca
interesting i have never seen anything like that before
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 11:05 AM
  #3  
drew303's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 2
From: Olympia, WA
never heard of but they seem to be more of a stock upgrade to provide a better ride and bit more flex.

All their springs are relatively flat (not much arch)
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 11:12 AM
  #4  
Swansen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
i stumbled upon these link earlier, but lost them at the time of posting, anyways, got them again.
http://www.man-a-fre.com/pa/hstparabolicleafsprings.htm
http://www.eastcoastrover.com/Parabolics.html
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 11:31 AM
  #5  
Swansen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by drew303
never heard of but they seem to be more of a stock upgrade to provide a better ride and bit more flex.

All their springs are relatively flat (not much arch)
They can be made to any specification, and i'm sure they could make them as lift springs also. They are better than conventional leaf springs in every way. On leaf spring arch, i was under the impression that less is better, while not being flat, you get to much arch and you loose flexibility.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 12:01 PM
  #6  
dropzone's Avatar
Fossilized
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 19,771
Likes: 456
From: PNW
Those parabollic springs sound good but I guess they do not perform as well as
predicted. They are said to perform well when installed with an axle mounted over the spring. It turns out they did not live up to expectations when mounted in a SPring over axle situation (like most toyota 4wd axles)
4WD Toyota OwnerMagazine did an install on an FJ40 in the May/June '07 issue
pages 28-36.
In the September/October '07 issue pages 72-73 they had removed the springs.
In their situation it did not work out when installed in an SOA. Just a heads up on one case.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 01:45 PM
  #7  
Swansen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by ocdropzone
Those parabollic springs sound good but I guess they do not perform as well as
predicted. They are said to perform well when installed with an axle mounted over the spring. It turns out they did not live up to expectations when mounted in a SPring over axle situation (like most toyota 4wd axles)
4WD Toyota OwnerMagazine did an install on an FJ40 in the May/June '07 issue
pages 28-36.
In the September/October '07 issue pages 72-73 they had removed the springs.
In their situation it did not work out when installed in an SOA. Just a heads up on one case.
Interesting, i'll have to look at that, thanks for the info... and i now have to bite my tongue.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 01:56 PM
  #8  
drew303's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 2
From: Olympia, WA
Originally Posted by ocdropzone
Those parabollic springs sound good but I guess they do not perform as well as
predicted. They are said to perform well when installed with an axle mounted over the spring. It turns out they did not live up to expectations when mounted in a SPring over axle situation (like most toyota 4wd axles)
4WD Toyota OwnerMagazine did an install on an FJ40 in the May/June '07 issue
pages 28-36.
In the September/October '07 issue pages 72-73 they had removed the springs.
In their situation it did not work out when installed in an SOA. Just a heads up on one case.
I betcha it's because when you run them under the axle the theres no torqueing of the entire spring pack because the first spring in the pack has the eyes, which would be directly connected to the axle versa if you install them ontop of the axle (like our trucks, fjs etc) then your putting the contact point on the outer spring which might cause the spring pack to break or move excessively seeing as how the design has them spaced apart.

maybe if they made a pack with the eye spring on the bottom vs the top, for a SOA application?
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 02:42 PM
  #9  
Swansen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by drew303
I betcha it's because when you run them under the axle the theres no torqueing of the entire spring pack because the first spring in the pack has the eyes, which would be directly connected to the axle versa if you install them ontop of the axle (like our trucks, fjs etc) then your putting the contact point on the outer spring which might cause the spring pack to break or move excessively seeing as how the design has them spaced apart.

maybe if they made a pack with the eye spring on the bottom vs the top, for a SOA application?
mmm, that makes a lot of sense, and i bet thats it the problem.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 03:11 PM
  #10  
dropzone's Avatar
Fossilized
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 19,771
Likes: 456
From: PNW
they had even tried adding a traction bar, but no help
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hiluxinargentina
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
Sep 30, 2015 05:51 PM
JookUpVandetti
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
10
Sep 30, 2015 08:58 AM
Cycles
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
8
Sep 29, 2015 06:37 AM
oldblue
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
0
Sep 28, 2015 04:07 PM
83
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
Sep 27, 2015 04:13 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:15 AM.