Anyone going to do the 5.7 L i-Force swap?
Feb 15, 2006 | 08:46 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Anyone going to do the 5.7 L i-Force swap?
Who's gonna be the first to swap a 5.7 Liter i-force into their truck or 4runner?
I Just heard a STRONG rumour that this new Tundra engine will have 355 Horsepower and 380 ft-lbs of torque.
I Just heard a STRONG rumour that this new Tundra engine will have 355 Horsepower and 380 ft-lbs of torque.
Feb 15, 2006 | 10:20 PM
#2
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Or how about the new Lexus LS engine and transmission?
The new LS 460 will have a 4.6 liter engine with 380 horsepower and 370 ft-lbs of torque mated to an 8, yes EIGHT, speed automatic transmission. The first transmission of it's kind.
The new LS 460 will have a 4.6 liter engine with 380 horsepower and 370 ft-lbs of torque mated to an 8, yes EIGHT, speed automatic transmission. The first transmission of it's kind.
Trending Topics
Feb 18, 2006 | 09:25 AM
#8
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,981
Likes: 4
From: Lacey, WA
displacement doesn't necessarily directly relate to external engine dimensions. take, for example, the 281(4.6l) ford, and the 351 ford. the 4.6 dwarfs the 351 in size, it's nearly as big as a 460 big block.
same goes for the 2.7l toyota, that engine with the manifolds on is approximately the size of a chevy small block.
same goes for the 2.7l toyota, that engine with the manifolds on is approximately the size of a chevy small block.
Feb 18, 2006 | 12:01 PM
#9
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: N43*27.220', W76*30.330'
Originally Posted by kyle_22r
displacement doesn't necessarily directly relate to external engine dimensions. take, for example, the 281(4.6l) ford, and the 351 ford. the 4.6 dwarfs the 351 in size, it's nearly as big as a 460 big block.
same goes for the 2.7l toyota, that engine with the manifolds on is approximately the size of a chevy small block.
same goes for the 2.7l toyota, that engine with the manifolds on is approximately the size of a chevy small block.
Feb 18, 2006 | 12:23 PM
#10
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,981
Likes: 4
From: Lacey, WA
no, i'm saying that the engine's displacement and external size aren't always related.
however, i'm sure the engine is almost certainly going to be of a DOHC design, which typically isn't compact. most likely a relative of the current 4.7L mill.
however, i'm sure the engine is almost certainly going to be of a DOHC design, which typically isn't compact. most likely a relative of the current 4.7L mill.
Feb 18, 2006 | 05:50 PM
#12
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: N43*27.220', W76*30.330'
Originally Posted by kyle_22r
no, i'm saying that the engine's displacement and external size aren't always related.
however, i'm sure the engine is almost certainly going to be of a DOHC design, which typically isn't compact. most likely a relative of the current 4.7L mill.
however, i'm sure the engine is almost certainly going to be of a DOHC design, which typically isn't compact. most likely a relative of the current 4.7L mill.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vanion2
99+ Tundra, 00+ Sequoia, 98+ Land Cruiser/LX470
2
Jul 29, 2015 06:17 PM
