Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

failed smog! god california sucks!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 09:51 AM
  #41  
JDMSLIK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Prince George, BC
do you know what the maximum allowable HC is?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 10:00 AM
  #42  
ozziesironmanoffroad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 1
From: Spring Valley, CA
HC passed. CO2 passed. its the NOx part that failed. and no i dont know what the max. HC is... doesnt it say it on the paper?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 11:23 AM
  #43  
JDMSLIK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Prince George, BC
no it doesn't.
Can you pull your plugs and post a picture of them?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 11:28 AM
  #44  
ozziesironmanoffroad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 1
From: Spring Valley, CA
i will tomorrow, i have a lot of cleanup here to do. we just got a big dumpster cuz we're remodeling, and i have a lot of crap to pick up. theyre less than 2 weeks old though. do you need just one plug, or all of them? cuz i dont mind pulling all but the last plug. the #4 plug is a PITA to get out and get back in. why i dont know.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 11:34 AM
  #45  
abecedarian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 6
From: Temecula Valley, CA
It appears the NOx test was done on a dyno at 15 and 25 mph and varying loads to the wheels no? Given that as true, perhaps the EGR valve is not opening, which it should be in this case. You'll need some way of verifying that the EGR is operating- disconnecting the vacuum hose isn't going to do that. You'll need to apply vacuum to that port on the EGR valve while the engine is running and check that the engine begins stumbling and possibly dies. If that happens, the EGR valve itself is functional, but not getting the vacuum signal to open.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 11:41 AM
  #46  
ozziesironmanoffroad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 1
From: Spring Valley, CA
question. how do i apply for a one year waiver/extension in california? i cannot afford the smog repairs, if its not the EGR. once i start working, then ill be able to, i just cant right now. any ideas?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 11:48 AM
  #47  
abecedarian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 6
From: Temecula Valley, CA
http://www.bar.ca.gov/01_ConsumerAct...icleFails.html
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 12:15 PM
  #48  
ozziesironmanoffroad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 1
From: Spring Valley, CA
so i gotta get it smogged again, then ask them for the economic hardship waiver paper?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 06:23 PM
  #49  
JDMSLIK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Prince George, BC
Originally Posted by abecedarian
It appears the NOx test was done on a dyno at 15 and 25 miles per hour and varying loads to the wheels no? Given that as true, perhaps the EGR valve is not opening, which it should be in this case. You'll need some way of verifying that the EGR is operating- disconnecting the vacuum hose isn't going to do that. You'll need to apply vacuum to that port on the EGR valve while the engine is running and check that the engine begins stumbling and possibly dies. If that happens, the EGR valve itself is functional, but not getting the vacuum signal to open.
Or you could just push up on the egr diaphram with a small screwdriver, your finger or some people on this site like to suck on the diaphram hose.
You can do it like this, well kinda this is off a 3vze and it's off the car. But still easy on car. Just make sure you push on the matal and not the rubber.

Last edited by JDMSLIK; Jun 19, 2008 at 06:43 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 06:41 PM
  #50  
JDMSLIK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Prince George, BC
Originally Posted by ozziesironmanoffroad
Look at the very first reading on the chart. The driver has it sitting at 0mph revving at 1500 rpm and his Nox are through the roof.

So then somebodys gonna say that the nox doesn't ever really drop off either.

Look in the middle the first reading just after the line drawn across
-the speed increases to 25mph from 15 mph
-the rpms increase from 1500 to 2500
-the nox levels increase only by about 2-250 ppm to 2200 ppm while in comparison with rpm you'd think they should go up to roughly 3000-3500 ppm
-the HC's drop dramatically, almost in half. I can't really explain this one but sometimes you just look for signs that stick out.

I'm gonna say that looks like the EGR is working.

Back to my original point I think it's a carbon build up problem, it's just a hunch. Then again if his threads on his #4 spark plug hole are all festered and he needs the truck on the road, It'd probably be a good move to try to find one of those smog loopholes to go through.

Oh and another thing. In his vehicle write up he mentions that he's got roughly 260,000 miles on the original motor. Unless he's running it on propane, I would definitely suspect carbon build up.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 07:20 PM
  #51  
ozziesironmanoffroad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 1
From: Spring Valley, CA
the threads arent screwed up on spark plug #4, its just a pain getting a socket and a ratchet back there. once positioned right, it threads in easily by hand all the way. so should i put my old spark plugs in, run a can of seafoam through, change the oil, then get it smogged again?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 07:44 PM
  #52  
Jay351's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 10
From: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
Funny, mine failed almost exactly like yours, extremley high Nox right at the start, then it dropped a tad and just stayed constant.

I would start testing your vacuum hoses, replace any that are cracked and check that egr modulator.

Do you have access to the past tests done on the truck? If so, check them out. I can see my trucks smog reports from 6 years back, and i watched my Nox get slowly higher each year till it went over the max...
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 07:49 PM
  #53  
ozziesironmanoffroad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 1
From: Spring Valley, CA
that i dont.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 08:01 PM
  #54  
JDMSLIK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Prince George, BC
Originally Posted by Jay351
Funny, mine failed almost exactly like yours, extremley high Nox right at the start, then it dropped a tad and just stayed constant.

I would start testing your vacuum hoses, replace any that are cracked and check that egr modulator.

Do you have access to the past tests done on the truck? If so, check them out. I can see my trucks smog reports from 6 years back, and i watched my Nox get slowly higher each year till it went over the max...
How would your EGR, EGR modulator or vacuum lines affect your nox readings during low speed/rpm?
Please explain.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 08:57 PM
  #55  
ozziesironmanoffroad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 1
From: Spring Valley, CA
i dont know, im tryin to figure that out too
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 09:18 PM
  #56  
Jay351's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 10
From: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
Originally Posted by JDMSLIK
How would your EGR, EGR modulator or vacuum lines affect your nox readings during low speed/rpm?
Please explain.
I can't exactly say, but replacing the modulator fixed my issue..
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 09:29 PM
  #57  
abecedarian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 6
From: Temecula Valley, CA
Originally Posted by JDMSLIK
Look at the very first reading on the chart. The driver has it sitting at 0mph revving at 1500 rpm and his Nox are through the roof.
I thought that for a moment too, but then noticed that it went from 0 to 15 in 2 seconds, CO2 changed from 0 to 14.2%, RPM didn't and the torque load of the dyno went down so I attributed that to the test equipment sensors coming online and beginning logging.
Originally Posted by JDMSLIK
So then somebodys gonna say that the nox doesn't ever really drop off either.
Okay. It doesn't ever really drop off either.
Originally Posted by JDMSLIK
Look in the middle the first reading just after the line drawn across
-the speed increases to 25mph from 15 miles per hour
-the rpms increase from 1500 to 2500
-the nox levels increase only by about 2-250 ppm to 2200 ppm while in comparison with rpm you'd think they should go up to roughly 3000-3500 ppm
-the HC's drop dramatically, almost in half. I can't really explain this one but sometimes you just look for signs that stick out.
Possibly the ECU going into closed loop? Either way, HC's are passing, and are somewhat consistant at each speed.
Originally Posted by JDMSLIK
I'm gonna say that looks like the EGR is working.
I'm going to say it's not. Two reasons: no significant reduction in NOx, in fact an increase at 25mph; his ecu is throwing an egr related trouble code. I'm going to go so far as to say it's not opening.
Originally Posted by JDMSLIK
Back to my original point I think it's a carbon build up problem, it's just a hunch. Then again if his threads on his #4 spark plug hole are all festered and he needs the truck on the road, It'd probably be a good move to try to find one of those smog loopholes to go through.

Oh and another thing. In his vehicle write up he mentions that he's got roughly 260,000 miles on the original motor. Unless he's running it on propane, I would definitely suspect carbon build up.
I might agree on some carbon in there too. As for it being the cause of the problem, I don't, unless it's carbon causing blockage in the EGR passages. If the EGR were working, you'd expect the NOx to drop at some point in the test, which it doesn't.

I am actually considering the converter as a suspect as well.
-edit: okay, I figured I should elaborate...
Theory: partially plugged converter increases backpressure sufficiently that chamber temps rise.

Last edited by abecedarian; Jun 19, 2008 at 09:42 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 09:37 PM
  #58  
4Crawler's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 34
From: SF Bay Area, CA
One thing I have found is that there is varying degrees of "EGR working". My '85/22RE engine would stumble/die if I manually operated the EGR with a vacuum source. However, it would not drop the NOx low enough to pass the dyno smog test. What I found was blockages inside the EGR passages (in the head and the valve itself) that were limiting the actual flow of exhaust gas. In order to affect the engine running at 2000-3000 RPM and at fairly high load from the dyno, it takes a lot of exhaust gas to flow back into the engine to drop the combustion temps/NOx.

I spent a day cleaning out the internal EGR passages in the head and also in my LC Engr. header that had some restrictions that I ported out for better back flow. Also cleaned the inside of the EGR and the modulator. Then to help reduce NOx further, I fillled up w/ 92 octane gas and retarded the timing from 5-BTDC to down to about 1-BTDC. All that dropped my NOx from ~2400 down to ~800.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 05:09 AM
  #59  
ozziesironmanoffroad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 1
From: Spring Valley, CA
will seafoam clean the passages if intoduced to the PCV?
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 09:10 AM
  #60  
JDMSLIK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Prince George, BC
Originally Posted by abecedarian
I thought that for a moment too, but then noticed that it went from 0 to 15 in 2 seconds, CO2 changed from 0 to 14.2%, RPM didn't and the torque load of the dyno went down so I attributed that to the test equipment sensors coming online and beginning logging.

14% co2 is representing a complete combustion, writing off a lean or rich condition

Okay. It doesn't ever really drop off either.
Possibly the ECU going into closed loop? Either way, HC's are passing, and are somewhat consistant at each speed.

I find that one hard to believe. I don't know how you guys do it down there, but our vehicles are running while in the line up. Even if you turned of the vehicle, with the cali heat I figure it would have to sit for at least an hour to get into open loop.

I'm going to say it's not. Two reasons: no significant reduction in NOx, in fact an increase at 25mph; his ecu is throwing an egr related trouble code. I'm going to go so far as to say it's not opening.

I can't explain the trouble code, does this system have a MAP? And whose to say it's not going down. The only real way to find out would be to hook it up to a 5gas analyzer on a dyno and disconnect the EGR. There's too much missing info. here.

I might agree on some carbon in there too. As for it being the cause of the problem, I don't, unless it's carbon causing blockage in the EGR passages. If the EGR were working, you'd expect the NOx to drop at some point in the test, which it doesn't.

I am actually considering the converter as a suspect as well.
-edit: okay, I figured I should elaborate...
Theory: partially plugged converter increases backpressure sufficiently that chamber temps rise.
Due to the co2 levels it's looking like combustion is complete. So I'd right off the cat clog issue. Even if it was an issue, it would probably be accompanied with a lack of power or misfiring complaint.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:53 AM.