Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

cat delete?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2018, 12:32 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
JayxC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cat delete?

My 1987 22r toyota pickup needs some spice, and i was wondering if i could bang out the cat without any further modifications? Would it do anything bad?
Old 06-25-2018, 01:06 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
old87yota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Posts: 3,084
Received 570 Likes on 449 Posts
Why do you want to do that?

What do you mean by "spice"?

Do you like to breathe? I know I do. As the name implies, a catalytic converter converts toxic gases that are emitted from your engine and converts them into less harmful gasses.

If your catalytic converter is working properly (i.e. the catalyst is not clogged or damaged), you should not gain anything from smashing out the catalyst other than breathing in more toxins.

Old 06-25-2018, 01:11 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Discombobulated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Denver CO
Posts: 2,255
Received 216 Likes on 158 Posts
It will stink and you will get ABSOLUTELY no power gains, if you want more spice you have the wrong vehicle.
Old 06-25-2018, 01:34 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
JayxC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In that case, do you recommend an exhaust system to deepen its tone or make it not so quiet? I'm happy with with its performance, and don't want to hurt the engines longevity. But just looking for suggestions.
Old 06-25-2018, 01:36 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
JayxC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i wanted to do it because its already rusting out and starting to have leaks, it needs to be replaced regardless.
Old 06-25-2018, 02:04 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Discombobulated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Denver CO
Posts: 2,255
Received 216 Likes on 158 Posts
You could get a good high flow muffler or for more noise maybe a cherry bombish muffler, the noise is up to you. Just remember it’s a 4 cylinder, noise in my Subaru is welcomed but personally in my truck I love it quiet and would hate to hear it rapping out every gear change.

I just went with a standard muff as even a high flow one is questionable on power gains, jump on you tube and search a bit, although you can never really judge the sound unless it’s in front of you might be able to get a better idea of the tone..

Last edited by Discombobulated; 06-25-2018 at 02:06 PM.
Old 07-02-2018, 12:25 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
RAD4Runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 7,080
Received 663 Likes on 455 Posts
Originally Posted by JayxC
... make it not so quiet? ...
Originally Posted by old87yota
... you should not gain anything from smashing out the catalyst other than breathing in more toxins.
O.P., Please stay away from where I live, drive and play.

Like I said in other thread, save money and buy a header.

Last edited by RAD4Runner; 07-02-2018 at 08:39 PM.
Old 07-02-2018, 02:43 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
old87yota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Posts: 3,084
Received 570 Likes on 449 Posts
I should have given you my rusted out exhaust and muffler before I replaced it!

The truck was quite loud (kind of a raspy fart-can exhaust sound). The truck sounded cool for all of five minutes. Then it got annoying.

A new muffler and exhaust would more likely give you the results you are looking for.

Old 07-05-2018, 10:02 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
jakey poo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Gaston, OR
Posts: 960
Received 147 Likes on 105 Posts
I'm pretty happy with my exhaust, Thorley header, hi-flow cat (mine was dead,) cat back exhaust and pro-flow muffler. Not overly loud, not ricey, just a nice rumble down low. Gets a little annoying when you rev it out, but after all it is a 4 banger.
Old 07-11-2018, 05:18 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
the171's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 127
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Cats are needed for emissions tests. If you dont need to do such a test there is no need. The vehicle wont smell any different if your air fuel ratio is normal. This isnt a diesel. The stock oem exhaust is very weak. It should be 2.5" minimum. 3" cant hurt and theres plenty space for it. Cats, resonators.... Dont do much for sound. Mufflers take care of noise, a quality chambered muffler of adequate size will be quiet as stock. Do it all in stainless, and it will last.
Old 07-11-2018, 06:09 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
old87yota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Posts: 3,084
Received 570 Likes on 449 Posts
Originally Posted by the171
The stock oem exhaust is very weak. It should be 2.5" minimum. 3" cant hurt and theres plenty space for it.


Where are you getting this information from?

My factory exhaust seemed pretty strong to me.... high quality for aluminized steel...

Bigger is not necessarily better.

There is a LOT of engineering that goes behind designing a proper exhaust system. You cannot simply slap a large diameter exhaust on and magically gain horsepower. You may actually lose performance if you are not careful. The exhaust system should be designed around the engine and the best balance of flow, scavenging, and exhaust velocity for the intended RPM range that the engine will be operating in the most. These factors will vary depending on if the engine is stock or modified.

Old 07-11-2018, 06:49 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
the171's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 127
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by old87yota


Where are you getting this information from?

My factory exhaust seemed pretty strong to me.... high quality for aluminized steel...

Bigger is not necessarily better.

There is a LOT of engineering that goes behind designing a proper exhaust system. You cannot simply slap a large diameter exhaust on and magically gain horsepower. You may actually lose performance if you are not careful. The exhaust system should be designed around the engine and the best balance of flow, scavenging, and exhaust velocity for the intended RPM range that the engine will be operating in the most. These factors will vary depending on if the engine is stock or modified.

im into exhaust and welding that’s how I developed my opinion on what’s good and what isn’t.

When it comes to exhaust bigger is better always. Actually less is better. Ideally the exhaust header would exit the hood or fender. Anything beyond that is a sacrifice for sound and pollution.

Its not that you’ll gain horsepower with a high performance exhaust. But rather, you’ll lose power by choking an engine. Even more important than power is exhaust gas temperature. More restriction and parts to push through causes more heat and more stress on the engine. I don’t run an egt gauge in my truck so I can’t comment on egt numbers but without a doubt the teeny tiny stock exhaust will be raising egt and reducing power when the truck is pulling weight or working hard.

take a look at a dragster running fast times. Take a look at a Peterbilt truck. Big flow, always. Engines are air pumps.

Aluminized is ok. Stainless is best.

Last edited by the171; 07-11-2018 at 06:51 PM.
Old 07-12-2018, 07:26 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
jakey poo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Gaston, OR
Posts: 960
Received 147 Likes on 105 Posts
You're flat out wrong. Bigger is not always better when it comes to exhausts. If you're talking a turbo or diesel application then you want as free flowing as you can possibly get. On these 22r motors anything over 2.5" is going to rob you of some low end power.
Old 07-12-2018, 08:48 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
the171's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 127
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I’m not one for online arguments and respect everyone’s opinion. But certainly I am not wrong. It’s been proven on dynos plenty, less restriction causes improved performance. There is no logical explanation for why a larger exhaust is not beneficial. It doesn’t matter if it’s diesel or a small or large gas engine. Like I said open header is ideal. Obviously that’s not practical. 3” is good, expect low egt. 2.5” is good enough though. It’s a low output motor.
Old 07-12-2018, 01:17 PM
  #15  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
thefishguy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: sammamish, wa.
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 62 Likes on 57 Posts
Seriously a 3" exhaust on a 22r motor? 2.5" is the very biggest I have seen recommended. Most people find a happy place with 2" or 2.5". 3" would probably eliminate most of your bottom end power.

@the171. Please if you are going to give contradicting information to most everybody's experience with the 22r series motors could you please at least tell us your real experience with these motors? I will start, I have had a 85 22re pickup, 89 22re pickup, 93 22re pickup and now a 85 22re 4runner. My experience with this motor is still limited mainly because I have on fully rebuilt 1 and done head gaskets and timing chains on the others. Nor have I ever seen a dino sheet for one I have owned. However I have played with many different intakes and exhausts in the process and in all cases if your going to do something like a 3" or straight header you need to allow the motor to use it or you are just throwing money at something for giggles.

Most all of the 22re guru's LCE & ENGNBLDR both recommend 2.25" for best power and drivability.

Last edited by thefishguy77; 07-12-2018 at 01:36 PM.
Old 07-12-2018, 01:25 PM
  #16  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
thefishguy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: sammamish, wa.
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 62 Likes on 57 Posts
Originally Posted by the171
I’m not one for online arguments and respect everyone’s opinion. But certainly I am not wrong. It’s been proven on dynos plenty, less restriction causes improved performance. There is no logical explanation for why a larger exhaust is not beneficial. It doesn’t matter if it’s diesel or a small or large gas engine. Like I said open header is ideal. Obviously that’s not practical. 3” is good, expect low egt. 2.5” is good enough though. It’s a low output motor.
Please show us a dino sheet where a stock ish 22r or 22re motor makes more power with a 3" vs 2.5". Turbos and diesels don't like back pressure. However back pressure doesn't always hurt you. Many exhaust systems utilize scavenging, one example is the already spent exhaust in the pipe helps pull the newly created exhaust out. Its more commonly used with 2 strokes but the same applies to most all motors. These motors produce most all the "power" in the head. So to put a big exhaust on without making sure the intake and engine can handle the ability to get more out without getting more in and through is money wasted. I have run stock, 2", 2.25" and 2.5". 2.25 i felt gave me the best drivability.
Old 07-12-2018, 03:57 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
the171's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 127
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Ok guys play with your mini exhausts if you want. I like big and so do most who know what’s up. But everyone has their opinion, that’s what makes life interesting. To the op... Ditch the cat and up the flow it’s a worthwhile project. That’s all I got to say about it.
Old 07-12-2018, 05:07 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
scope103's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Francisco East Bay
Posts: 8,254
Likes: 0
Received 822 Likes on 649 Posts
Well that discussion degenerated quickly. Perhaps because it included those who announce their unsupported opinion, and when asked about it, insist "certainly I am not wrong." Why am I not wrong and others are? Because "im into exhaust and welding."

It may just be me, but if I was the one "into" a subject, I would be able to do the necessary calculations in my sleep (and could repeat them when called for). Short of that, I could cite to a half-dozen of the more respected publications. (A quick google search turned up
https://www.hotrod.com/articles/what...pes-work-best/
http://www.exhaustvideos.com/faq/how...pipe-diameter/
https://blog.tdotperformance.ca/guid...pipe-diameter/
I can't say that any of these are authoritative, but they do seem to back up their claims with calculations. Oh, and none of them buy into "bigger is always better.")

Or, I could just claim that "most who know what's up" agree with me. But that would NOT be advancing the discussion.

So let's try to keep it informative. I want to hear your opinion, but back it up!
Old 07-13-2018, 09:58 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
RAD4Runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 7,080
Received 663 Likes on 455 Posts
Originally Posted by the171
I’m not one for online argument...
YUP.
Opinions without verification don't matter.
DYNO before and after will the fact.
I wonder how much shop would charge for this?
Anyone who's planning to mod the exhaust willing to do this?

Last edited by RAD4Runner; 07-13-2018 at 10:02 AM.
Old 07-13-2018, 02:40 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
L5wolvesf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 1,058
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
There are formulas and books (plural) on engine tuning including exhaust system length and diameter. A friend of mine has/had the formulas on his computer (DOS) and we did the measurements and ran the numbers. When we ran the numbers for a big pipe on different small 4 cylinder engines the useful RPM range decreased as compared to the smaller pipes.

2 of the books are:

Scientific Design of Exhaust and Intake Systems (Engineering and Performance)

Performance Tuning in Theory and Practice, Four Strokes
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rancherman
Newbie Tech Section
3
04-20-2018 03:47 PM
Quick Cal
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
7
11-18-2017 02:41 AM
Knix47
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
1
07-30-2017 01:08 AM
sevenphoenix
The Classifieds GraveYard
1
05-20-2017 09:47 AM



Quick Reply: cat delete?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:36 PM.