Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Beefy front CV's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 11:51 AM
  #1  
chimmike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
From: SRQ, FL
Beefy front CV's?

Just wondering, for those of us who don't want to go SAS........does anyone make beefier front CV's with perhaps a better, more aggressive angle?
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 04:53 PM
  #2  
Bear80's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio TX
The stock outter birfield joints are very strong, its the inners that are the weak link. You could buy a oem set of expensive outters, have them cryo'd and put a set of porsche inners. Infact Downey now sells the prosche inners and the flange.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 05:03 PM
  #3  
Stomis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
From: Point Pleasant NJ
Sounds like money that could be put towards a SAS or a set or 2 of those CV's I keep hearing about with a lifetime replacment.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 05:48 PM
  #4  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
Search - it's been discussed a number of times. Long story short, the answer is yes, but it'll cost enough to take a big chunk out of the SAS cost.

Last edited by tc; Feb 5, 2007 at 05:49 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 03:51 AM
  #5  
rocket's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,683
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
don't waste your time.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 05:18 AM
  #6  
chimmike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
From: SRQ, FL
I just don't have the need to go SAS. I'll be running a front locker shortly and 5.29's. I don't want to dump that kind of money into this truck, only to have to convert the rear to a leaf setup as well.

I think that a beefed up IFS system will be plenty capable for my needs.

And I tried searching, but my brain isn't functioning trying to think of different keywords.

Why is this a waste of time? some strong, high angle CV's will last long and allow for better flex.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 05:38 AM
  #7  
AxleIke's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 6
From: Arvada, Colorado
If you do beef the CV's, please let us know how it goes, and how hard it was, etc...

Also post up what you end up doing for the steering once you've got the front locked.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 06:33 AM
  #8  
Albuquerque Jim's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Originally Posted by chimmike
I just don't have the need to go SAS. I'll be running a front locker shortly and 5.29's. I don't want to dump that kind of money into this truck, only to have to convert the rear to a leaf setup as well.

I think that a beefed up IFS system will be plenty capable for my needs.

And I tried searching, but my brain isn't functioning trying to think of different keywords.

Why is this a waste of time? some strong, high angle CV's will last long and allow for better flex.
I suggest buying a 3rd gen. Not because the CV's are stronger, but because the steering is. I have seen more trail trouble from steering components on 2nd gen trucks than CV problems. It's no biggie to change a CV out in 30 minutes, but destroying steering components everytime out gets old. Just my $.02.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 07:06 AM
  #9  
chimmike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
From: SRQ, FL
LOL, why buy a truck when I already have one? That's even more than doing a SAS. The point of this is to NOT spend $3k.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 07:08 AM
  #10  
RustBucket's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 25
From: Atlanta
I'm working on a technology that will protect CVs from breaking. When I get it finalized, you'll be the first to know
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 07:14 AM
  #11  
deathrunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,969
Likes: 1
From: San Diego CA
porsche cv's are your best bet. Any of the desert race companies can direct you. check www.kartek.com or www.protrux.net

Last edited by deathrunner; Feb 6, 2007 at 09:10 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 07:35 AM
  #12  
BLKNBLU's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 1
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by chimmike
And I tried searching, but my brain isn't functioning trying to think of different keywords.
Here's one thread: https://www.yotatech.com/forums/show...hlight=porsche
Try searching "Porsche" as it is the Porsche cv's that are supposed to be the hot item.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 08:00 AM
  #13  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
So I get the feeling you are looking just because you're afraid you'll potentially blow CV's with the new setup?

The price range seems to vary between $500 and $1000 a set - a ton of money to spend on a "maybe". The other thing to consider is that you can't really beef up the 7.5" R&P, and the 5.29 pinion only has 7 teeth. i would rather blow hubs or CV's than a R&P any day...
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 08:32 AM
  #14  
Albuquerque Jim's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Originally Posted by chimmike
LOL, why buy a truck when I already have one? That's even more than doing a SAS. The point of this is to NOT spend $3k.
I am merely making the point that the CV's are #1 cheap and #2 easy to replace. The steering seems to be more the problem with a locked front on a 2nd gen.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 08:34 AM
  #15  
Flygtenstein's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 1
From: Fort Collins, CO
I have killed 6 outer joints. Not a single inner. The INNERS are STRONGER.

How many joints have you broken or are you giving in to internet hype?

The outer is a CV type, the inner is a tripod. On LT kits, they use T-100 inners that are true CV's for more range of motion.

2nd Gen steering licks the big one.

The best CV's come from Longfield:


are 30 splines and go in these:
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 09:09 AM
  #16  
deathrunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,969
Likes: 1
From: San Diego CA
Originally Posted by Flygtenstein
The outer is a CV type, the inner is a tripod. On LT kits, they use T-100 inners that are true CV's for more range of motion.
Actually, on the 86-95 LT trucks, the inner is still a tripod, in fact the inner on a T-100 is atripod too. The Tundra has a true inner, I believe.

I'm not sure if anyone has come up with a replacement inner CV yet.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 09:16 AM
  #17  
Flygtenstein's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 1
From: Fort Collins, CO
Good catch.

Tundra is for sure.

Oops on the T-100.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 09:24 AM
  #18  
jsnby's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, CA
2nd gen steering blows....that was one of the deciding factors for my SAS.... and I really got tired of knocking my truck out of alignment after going over speed bumps
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 09:27 AM
  #19  
chimmike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
From: SRQ, FL
Originally Posted by tc
So I get the feeling you are looking just because you're afraid you'll potentially blow CV's with the new setup?

The price range seems to vary between $500 and $1000 a set - a ton of money to spend on a "maybe". The other thing to consider is that you can't really beef up the 7.5" R&P, and the 5.29 pinion only has 7 teeth. i would rather blow hubs or CV's than a R&P any day...

I'm sure I'll be doing the manual hub swap too.

Beef up? Cryo+shot peen can increase strength as much as 40%....which is pretty significant

I'll look into the porsche CV's. Mainly I'd like to get more flex out of them, since as stated the inners are tripods and a true inner CV will give more flex.

Thanks for the info so far guys.

No i haven't broken any yet....but I think the yet is just a matter of time now.

funny about the steering........I haven't been using a steering stabilizer for a few days now, and I'm actually completely surprised how the steering is not affected. Of course.....i'm still IFS which has a big role in that...but ya know....Steering can be beefed up/changed.

Last edited by chimmike; Feb 6, 2007 at 09:28 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 09:39 AM
  #20  
Yota82's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA.
SAS it and be one of the hundreds of people who got talked into it from an internet forum where the majority of the people think you need a solid axle to go through the Micky D's drive through. IFS is for losers!

Seriously, are you having a problem with CV breakage or are you wanting to prevent it from happening? IMO stock CV's are plenty strong for minimal flex and hp, unless you have a lot of travel CV angle is not so much of a problem. I understand that piece of mind is a good investment but there is a reason for Porche CV's being utalized and it all comes down to CV angle (the strength of a porche CV is secondary to the angle capabilities as far as a Toyota is concerned). If your suspension is stock or bracket lifted the angles of the CV's are not going to be such that are too much for the stockers. The reason that I say that the strength of a Porche CV is secondary is because you are dealing with a Toyota not a 600 hp buggy with 20+ inches of rear wheel travel on CV's. Front lockers are hard on everything and for the money I would rather break 10 stockers and replace them than buy an exotic specialty part that costs an arm and a leg that is capable of breaking too. They do break.

The stock steering on the Gen II's do suck but only until you put about $600 into them then they are fine.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:33 AM.