Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

4runner body swap??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2011 | 08:37 AM
  #1  
FuelforWar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 216
Likes: 6
From: Eatonville, Wa
4runner body swap??

Just sitting around today and a thought kind of came to me. From what I've read alot of people have been doing the motor swaps on there 2nd generation 4runners so there as powerful as the 3rd gens, but wont go to third gen because they prefer the body style of the 2nd gen. My question is could you actually just put a 2nd gen body onto a 3rd generation frame? I know you'd have a couple issues such as the side the fuel door is on and replacing the computer in the cab. But in theory everything should fit. Just seems to me it might be a little faster and not a whole lot more expensive compared to changing out a motor, splicing the nightmare of wires, and ect. Has anyone ever heard of anyone doing such a swap before. I've scanned over yota tech and all i've really been able to find is someone trying to put a 3rd gen shell on a 2nd gen frame.
Reply
Old May 17, 2011 | 08:58 AM
  #2  
bob200587's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,546
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Pretty sure 3rd gens are wider, and I know that the wheelbase is several inches longer.

Sounds like 10598716078456x more work than a 3.4 swap.
Reply
Old May 17, 2011 | 09:01 AM
  #3  
FuelforWar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 216
Likes: 6
From: Eatonville, Wa
lol yea maybe, but its just another route i've never heard of, and was wondering if anyone else had this idea and if it was possible.
Reply
Old May 17, 2011 | 09:06 AM
  #4  
bob200587's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,546
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
I think just about anything is possible with enough, time, money, and knowledge. Whether or not it's worth it...varies.
Reply
Old May 17, 2011 | 09:06 AM
  #5  
Swimmerboy2112's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 3
From: Walnutport, PA
A company (cant remember the name) put 1st gen bodies on 3rd gen frames with 3rd gen engines.
Reply
Old May 17, 2011 | 09:11 AM
  #6  
FuelforWar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 216
Likes: 6
From: Eatonville, Wa
how much extra work would this really be thou? besides being a pita to lift off the truck. whats really all involved in removing a shell? you wouldn't really need to gut it i would think if you planned on reusing it...
Reply
Old May 17, 2011 | 01:51 PM
  #7  
91diesel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: TN/KY.
by going with the newer IFS you would be getting a weaker, but better riding suspension. I'm personally a big fan of the original IFS setup.
Reply
Old May 17, 2011 | 02:11 PM
  #8  
lofreqjeff's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 1
From: Chandler AZ
I have a friend who put a 2nd gen 4Runner body on his 1st gen 4Runner - but it already has a Chevy 4.3 swap and a SAS - pretty awesome though.
Reply
Old May 17, 2011 | 02:55 PM
  #9  
eightnine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
3rd gens have weaker coil sprung ifs and an inferior and lighter frame. So besides the powertrain i think it would be a downgrade.
Reply
Old May 17, 2011 | 03:42 PM
  #10  
scuba's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 11,338
Likes: 120
From: Austin, Texas
Originally Posted by 91diesel
by going with the newer IFS you would be getting a weaker, but better riding suspension. I'm personally a big fan of the original IFS setup.
Originally Posted by eightnine
3rd gens have weaker coil sprung ifs and an inferior and lighter frame. So besides the powertrain i think it would be a downgrade.
Uh, weaker? Both of you please explain this "weakness" you speak of.


Reply
Old May 17, 2011 | 04:40 PM
  #11  
eightnine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
I remember reading an article on the US army using tacomas in Afganistan to try and blend in with the locals and after months of abuse the front suspension was getting destroyed as opposed to some of the hiluxs that had torsion bar ifs. I'll see if I can find the article. As for the frames I was getting mixed up with the tacoma frames that are c channel. I've picked up one of those frames at work when it was getting the frame swapped and it was noticably lighter compared to a buddys early 90s truck frame. I know the 3rd gens runners still have boxed frames but I am pretty sure they have crumple zones that the earlier frames don't.
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 11:07 PM
  #12  
skoti89's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 538
Likes: 6
From: Carson City
Originally Posted by eightnine
I remember reading an article on the US army using tacomas in Afganistan to try and blend in with the locals and after months of abuse the front suspension was getting destroyed as opposed to some of the hiluxs that had torsion bar ifs. I'll see if I can find the article. As for the frames I was getting mixed up with the tacoma frames that are c channel. I've picked up one of those frames at work when it was getting the frame swapped and it was noticably lighter compared to a buddys early 90s truck frame. I know the 3rd gens runners still have boxed frames but I am pretty sure they have crumple zones that the earlier frames don't.
that article sounds interesting. any luck finding it?
Reply
Old May 19, 2011 | 04:38 AM
  #13  
corax's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 7
From: PDX
Originally Posted by Swimmerboy2112
A company (cant remember the name) put 1st gen bodies on 3rd gen frames with 3rd gen engines.
I'm not sure they do this on a regular basis, but you might be thinking of Irbis Offroad in Colorado
Reply
Old May 20, 2011 | 02:32 PM
  #14  
FuelforWar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 216
Likes: 6
From: Eatonville, Wa
alright good. I just had very little luck finding anything about this. I suppose if the frame work and suspension are inferior it would be a downgrade....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedRunner_87
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
84
Jun 1, 2021 01:51 PM
MMA_Alex
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
25
Apr 18, 2017 05:07 AM
coryc85
Misc Stuff (Vehicle Related)
6
Sep 9, 2015 06:24 AM
Jnkml
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
Jul 6, 2015 01:20 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:53 AM.