Shackle questions
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: TN
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shackle questions
My truck has about a 4 inch lift on it, my front leafs are almost flat though. Is that normal?
Also they used the stock shackles after they installed the lift. Would it hurt to go with 5.5 shackles all the way around, only 2 inches more would that hurt the angles on the front. I have searched all this and noone actually awnsers this.
What size is everyone else running? Pics?
Also they used the stock shackles after they installed the lift. Would it hurt to go with 5.5 shackles all the way around, only 2 inches more would that hurt the angles on the front. I have searched all this and noone actually awnsers this.
What size is everyone else running? Pics?
#2
Registered User
What kind of leaf set up in the front?
I'm running homemade 6" shackles on my 79
most off the shelf SA kits come with a 6" shackle
remember for every 1" of shackle (eye-to-eye) length, you gain .5" of height
so stock being 4", using a 6" shackle will net 1" of extra altitude.
I'm running homemade 6" shackles on my 79
most off the shelf SA kits come with a 6" shackle
remember for every 1" of shackle (eye-to-eye) length, you gain .5" of height
so stock being 4", using a 6" shackle will net 1" of extra altitude.
#4
Registered User
#5
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only reason I could see for going with longer shackles is to either improve shackle angle or to add a bit of extra lift. Which are you looking to achieve? I run 5.5 inch shackles all the way around on my 80 (RUF's and 63's) and they seem to do quite well. For every inch longer than stock you will get approximately .5 inches of lift.
#7
Registered User
Trending Topics
#9
Registered User
This is probably why 4banginRunner says his flexes pretty good considering his are flat. This is assuming he has longer shackles with his 63's.
But putting longer shackles on is just a bandaid fix to the real problem. Flat springs.
#10
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: TN
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am looking to do a couple things. I am just trying to figure out the order. I want to maximize travel for right now.I will be swapping all my leafs to trail gears 5" leafs and adding new perches to ensure correct angles without shimming. I just figured if I could add the longer shackles for right now that might work untill I get the lift on.
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: beaverton, oregon
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
get your RUF on! get those flat superlifts out of there! probably cheaper than buying brand new shackles from trail-mart, assuming you know how to weld and what you are doing.
#12
Registered User
I agree and disagree, if they are flat they are shot however using a longer shackle will allow it to swing a little more and take away some but probably not all of the negative arch you will get from stuffing your tires.
This is probably why 4banginRunner says his flexes pretty good considering his are flat. This is assuming he has longer shackles with his 63's.
But putting longer shackles on is just a bandaid fix to the real problem. Flat springs.
This is probably why 4banginRunner says his flexes pretty good considering his are flat. This is assuming he has longer shackles with his 63's.
But putting longer shackles on is just a bandaid fix to the real problem. Flat springs.
Another advantage to the longer shackle, way it rotated my pinon back closer to where it should be (still bought 4* shims, didnt feel like pissing with new pads seeing how between 3 Toyota I swap rears like underwear ). Though a longer shackle in the front will hurt your pinon angle (twists the axle so the pinon points downward).
Clear anything up?
#14
Registered User
I really don't think I could get them to go negative unless I mess around with my bumstops. Stock location with the stock bumps works amazingly well with the 63s. My shocks are also in the stock location (longer shocks of course, Superlifts, which I have the part# if needed). Both I think contribute to the flexibility of my set-up. Ride is really good considering what it is, was better with the IFS, but who's concerned with ride quality at this stage of the game?
#15
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: TN
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So will the aftermarket leafs that are installed on my rear now work in the front? What years were the 63s in late 90s model 1500? Do you want two wheel drive or four? Then run what ,,5.5 shackles in the rear? What length up front?
#16
Registered User
63's, EVERYTHING you'd need to know is here
http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showt...threadid=20665
#18
Registered User
#20
Registered User
yes...
Ran them on my 79 for a little bit when I had it together, crazy flex.
Any year i'm pretty sure, 7 leaf pack
Copied from Pirate
WAGONEER / WAGGY SPRINGS
These are stock Jeep Wagoneer Springs
Length: 47" (Length is eye to eye)
Bushing: 3"
Lift: 3.5 - 3.75"
Cost: $200 New, $60-$100 Used
From JcWhitney.com:
1976 - 1992 Jeep Wagoneer, Front Leaf Spring
7 Heavy-duty Leaves #07ZX2048P $99.95 Ea
5 Leaves #07ZX2047B $84.95 Ea
The 7 leaf is supposed to be the ones you are looking for.
Pinion angle can be an issue if you just bolt waggs to the stock location. If you have dropped hanger or dual cases the problem is lessened.
44044 SPRINGS
44044s are Rancho Jeep Wagoneer Lift Springs.
Length: 47" (Length is eye to eye)
Center Pin split (front/rear) 22.5"/24.5"
Bushing: 2 3/4" & 3"
Lift: 5.25 - 5.5" (Lift is approximate and uses 1.5" longer than stock shackles giving 3/4" of lift)
Cost: $250 (Cost is for both sides incl. shipping/give or take)
44044's do not (by themselves) move your axle forward. They are the same length on the front half as stock toys (22.5"). While they do move the axle forward because of the lift they provide (arch in spring), when they compress to the point that they are flat, it's the same. Estimated 1/2" of actual axle relocation forward.
Ran them on my 79 for a little bit when I had it together, crazy flex.
Any year i'm pretty sure, 7 leaf pack
Copied from Pirate
WAGONEER / WAGGY SPRINGS
These are stock Jeep Wagoneer Springs
Length: 47" (Length is eye to eye)
Bushing: 3"
Lift: 3.5 - 3.75"
Cost: $200 New, $60-$100 Used
From JcWhitney.com:
1976 - 1992 Jeep Wagoneer, Front Leaf Spring
7 Heavy-duty Leaves #07ZX2048P $99.95 Ea
5 Leaves #07ZX2047B $84.95 Ea
The 7 leaf is supposed to be the ones you are looking for.
Pinion angle can be an issue if you just bolt waggs to the stock location. If you have dropped hanger or dual cases the problem is lessened.
44044 SPRINGS
44044s are Rancho Jeep Wagoneer Lift Springs.
Length: 47" (Length is eye to eye)
Center Pin split (front/rear) 22.5"/24.5"
Bushing: 2 3/4" & 3"
Lift: 5.25 - 5.5" (Lift is approximate and uses 1.5" longer than stock shackles giving 3/4" of lift)
Cost: $250 (Cost is for both sides incl. shipping/give or take)
44044's do not (by themselves) move your axle forward. They are the same length on the front half as stock toys (22.5"). While they do move the axle forward because of the lift they provide (arch in spring), when they compress to the point that they are flat, it's the same. Estimated 1/2" of actual axle relocation forward.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flying91
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
45
04-11-2024 04:39 PM
Jcrawl94
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
10
10-24-2015 04:34 PM
Shagool22
Offroad Tech
1
08-14-2015 12:24 AM