Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

22-RE Ram Air!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 30, 2015 | 09:39 PM
  #1  
mreagen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Arizona
22-RE Ram Air!

Hey all, I have this little idea in my head of designing a ram air intake system for my 86' pickup. My plan is to do the battery/intake swap, remove the passenger side headlight, and basically have a cone filter where the headlight should be. i would then run some mandrel bent intake tubing to the efi. Pretty simple. Any thoughts on this? If it werent for my stock air box being beat to crap i wouldnt even bother with a CAI but since my air box has a hole and is basically sucking in radiator heat i thought ahh, what the hell. This is kinda over the top but i figured i would do a little experimenting and have some fun. Let me know your thoughts guys!
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2015 | 11:41 PM
  #2  
wyoming9's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,381
Likes: 100
From: I live in New Tripoli Pa out in the woods
Red face

Myself I would just get another stock intake box .

I have never had luck with cone filters but if you only use it in dry weather .

It is your truck do as you will.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2015 | 02:04 AM
  #3  
Robert m's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 143
From: Apple Valley, CA
To me, the risk of being pulled over for having not just a non working but missing headlight, does not out weigh the power increase (if any) that would be gained by attempting this.
I would just get a new stock air box.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2015 | 07:33 AM
  #4  
mreagen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Arizona
I live in cave creek arizona so i dont think the dry weather thing is going to be a problem, it doesnt get much more dry than where I live.

As far as having a missing headlight, I have 2 Rigid Dually SAE approved LED pods that function as a second pair of headlights, I already checked with the local sheriff and they are totally legal.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2015 | 10:14 PM
  #5  
Robert m's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 143
From: Apple Valley, CA
Originally Posted by mreagen
As far as having a missing headlight, I have 2 Rigid Dually SAE approved LED pods that function as a second pair of headlights, I already checked with the local sheriff and they are totally legal.
Yeah... I still wouldn't do it. Around here, if you drive without the OEM headlights functioning (even with aux lighting) you will get pulled over for having a headlight out. Maybe the laws in AZ are different but even then, you probably wont gain anything from this. If you want forced induction, bolt on a turbo.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2015 | 04:09 PM
  #6  
mreagen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Arizona
i was thinking about going turbo but for less money i could throw a 1uz in there!
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2015 | 05:40 AM
  #7  
mct75's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 228
Likes: 1
From: North Alabama
Eh, I've tried "ram air" setups before and at WOT you're still sucking faster than 70MPH wind can blow.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2015 | 11:46 AM
  #8  
RJR's Avatar
RJR
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 110
From: Northern Colorado
The problem is that, at the relatively low speeds our vehicles travel, the actual ram air pressure boost is abysmally low, slightly less than .2 psi at 70mph, and even less at lower speeds. Given an atmospheric pressure of 14.7 psi, a .2psi boost represents a 1.3% horsepower increase, or about 1.5 extra horsepower for your 120HP 22re. Not very exciting, I don't think.

Ram air boost really only works usefully at speeds above 200 mph. At 600 mph, for example, a jet engine can pick up a 50% boost with a properly designed scoop.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2015 | 12:50 PM
  #9  
mreagen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Arizona
thanks for the info guys, i definitely learned a lot! Ill probably just go with the lce cai kit because its only about $200 and i am in need of a new intake anyways!
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2015 | 06:58 AM
  #10  
arlindsay1992's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 354
From: Southeast Virginia
The LCE intake is a hot air intake too. Just sucks air right from the engine bay. The only CAI I've seen aside from custom made one-offs is the factory airbox.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2015 | 04:27 PM
  #11  
mreagen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Arizona
what about a safari snorkel? It would be really useful for when i cross water and it sucks in air from the outside!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
old87yota
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
20
Sep 9, 2015 12:39 PM
mreagen
Vehicles - Trailers (Complete)
6
Sep 8, 2015 03:46 PM
Squigglez
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
9
Sep 4, 2015 07:33 AM
87blyota
Other Makes Cars/Trucks
7
Sep 3, 2015 03:35 AM
ATVTRAILRIDER
Misc Stuff (Vehicle Related)
0
Aug 19, 2015 06:44 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:33 AM.