Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

3.4 underpowered??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2011 | 01:29 PM
  #1  
CitrusTheDragon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: West Sacramento
Cool 3.4 underpowered??

I was just watching a tv show and the host said that the 3.4 was underpowered. Has anyone had this problem or is it pretty powerful? If so what kinda things did you do to make it more powerful?

I have never heard someone say that it was underpowered. I mean it's no big block but it's also no 22re either. I do not own a 5vz but I plan to in the future and kinda thought this might be a good topic to get some opinions on.

So anybody think it's underpowered?
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2011 | 06:16 PM
  #2  
stockwell45's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
From: Sonora, CA
Definitely not. Like you said, it depends on what it's compared to, but as far as V6's go it's one of the best engines ever made, especially for Toyota. Which tv host said that? And if it doesnt have enough power stock, just supercharge it.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2011 | 06:46 PM
  #3  
slacker's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,382
Likes: 301
From: BC Canada
lots of poeple dont really know what there talking about !! TV is like .. not always true


.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2011 | 07:13 PM
  #4  
CitrusTheDragon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: West Sacramento
On Powerblocktv they are building a ex-taco, I think it's on Horsepower and they turbo it instead of supercharger it's a cool build but I couldn't see them calling it under powered and being correct
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2011 | 07:37 PM
  #5  
91muddog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clara California
HA! and they said they should have left the 22re in the yota they built over the ramjet v8
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2011 | 07:43 PM
  #6  
CitrusTheDragon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: West Sacramento
They did???
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2011 | 08:44 PM
  #7  
dntsdad's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 5
From: Fresno, Ca.
I love mine. Especially after coming from a 3.0

Toyota really put the 0 in 3.0
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2011 | 09:48 PM
  #8  
CitrusTheDragon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: West Sacramento
So nobody have anything bad to say
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2011 | 09:52 PM
  #9  
BoredOutnJackdUp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
From: Beaverton, Oregon
i believe it puts out the same horse power as the earlier 350.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2011 | 09:55 PM
  #10  
DeathCougar's Avatar
Donny, you're out of your element
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,692
Likes: 58
From: Marysville, WA
I drive a 97 4Runner auto SR5. Its a decent power plant, but the problem with the 3rd gens is they weigh a TON. Well, 3900lbs so basically TWO tons. The Engine boasts 183hp, and 217 ft/lbs, but it just weighs so much it takes a little to get it up and going.

The automatic doesn't help anything. I drove a 1999 4Runner 5speed, and it put the power to the ground MUCH better.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2011 | 12:01 AM
  #11  
TNRabbit's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 36
From: TENN Native Languishing in Virginia
Compared to the new 4.0 V6, the 3.4 IS a dog.

But that's comparing apples to oranges.

As stated, it's pushing around a LOT of weight.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2011 | 07:04 AM
  #12  
CitrusTheDragon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: West Sacramento
So it's a power to weight ratio thing.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2011 | 12:47 PM
  #13  
drmix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
From: Graham, WA
I think it definitely depends on what your coming from. Of course its not a big v8. When I drove my friends 4 door taco I had plenty of power for getting on the highway. Its definitely a major step up from the 3.0.

Maybe they were running large tires without regearing?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2011 | 01:02 PM
  #14  
Greg_Canada's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
My 3.4 auto feels abit faster than my 3.0 5spd, especially when either truck is pulling a trailer. 3.4 5spd feels alot better.
the new 4.0's blow them out of the water.
The 3.4 in my 89 is far from stock and moves quite well
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2011 | 01:05 PM
  #15  
badattitude's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
I think it's a little weak too. It's a very good motor and can be supercharged for more power.

I put some intake and exhaust gadgets on mine and think I'm up to 192hp lol. Yea, it is not fast, and that is fine.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2011 | 06:06 PM
  #16  
My99's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 3
From: Fayetteville, AR
It's all relative to the period. The 3.0 wasn't labelled as such a dog back in 1988 and the 22RE wasn't completely worthless back in 85 when it was released. The 3.4 in 96 was a solid V6 with ample power for the day. Hell I used mine to tow my RX7 and it did a fine job. But it surely doesn't compete in 2011 with V6s. Today's V6 is far more economical and powerful. So yes, by "today's" standards the 3.4 is anemic. With that said, it doesn't take away from what the 3.4 was during it's time.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Steven.m.paulk
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
4
Jun 7, 2020 10:45 AM
primordialbeast117
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
11
Dec 19, 2015 12:23 PM
White Stripe
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
4
Oct 6, 2015 10:47 AM
Rerun
3.4 Swaps
2
Oct 1, 2015 12:24 PM
83
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
18
Sep 21, 2015 06:15 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:28 PM.