95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

How is your 04 4Runner rear defogger performance during snow?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 04:24 PM
  #1  
pwanghk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
How is your 04 4Runner rear defogger performance during snow?

Greetings:

Lately I have a couple of snow storm in NJ and get a chance to test my 04 4Runner Sport edition during the snow. I am surprise that the rear defogger is so inefficient. With the rear defogger button on and with the ventilation on defogger position, the snow keeps sticking into the rear window and doesn't completely melt away in comparison to my 99 Camry. Is this normal? If so, Toyota must defenitely build a more efficient rear defogger. I would prefer the old style defogger button where the driver turns it off manually.

Your feedback is greatly appreciated.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 06:27 PM
  #2  
The Dutch Man's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
The rear defogger sucks for snow. We've discussed it here before. Forget the defogger with snow. It's useless. We all have the same problem. Many have complained here on the forum.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 06:49 PM
  #3  
EDGE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 1
From: outside NYC
Takes a while to warm up but it eventually melts the stuff
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 05:37 AM
  #4  
ugadawg95's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
From: Bethlehem, GA
correct me if i am wrong but isn't the job of the rear defogger to DEFOG? not to melt snow and ice?
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 05:59 AM
  #5  
lee's Avatar
lee
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
From: boston, ma
my '01 defogger annoys the heck out of me.

it doesnt defog for like 15 minutes. then when it just starts to work, it turns off automatically.

the hell is that? what makes it think it should turn off??
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 06:12 AM
  #6  
ugadawg95's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
From: Bethlehem, GA
Originally posted by lee


the hell is that? what makes it think it should turn off??
It is on a timer.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 06:13 AM
  #7  
lee's Avatar
lee
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
From: boston, ma
well, i figured that.. but why?

its not like it pulls a lot of power or is a nuisance to the overall performance of the car.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 06:15 AM
  #8  
ugadawg95's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
From: Bethlehem, GA
i am guessing it is a safety measure...hmmmm. good question. I will agree with you, it is annoying sometimes!
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 11:16 AM
  #9  
FirstToy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 1
From: Southern California
If the heating element was not on a timer, the heat buildup would damage the element in the glass.
If the defroster were to be accidentally turned on on a hot day, it would be totally fried if it were not on a timer.
I think all rear defrosters have some type of auto shutoff.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 11:27 AM
  #10  
lee's Avatar
lee
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
From: boston, ma
stupid logical reasoning... :pat:
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2003 | 11:59 AM
  #11  
pwanghk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Thank you all for your input.

Have a happy and healthy hollidays everyone.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2003 | 09:24 PM
  #12  
TechWrench's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
From: Glenville, NY
Originally posted by saintsteve
correct me if i am wrong but isn't the job of the rear defogger to DEFOG? not to melt snow and ice?
I would have to disagree with you on that. Acording to my manual, they refer that 'useless' thing on the rear glass as a defroster. This is the first vehicle I have owned that didn't have the ability to melt even a light coating of snow in 20 mins time. I have two older Honda Accords and either one will melt a light coating of snow or ice within 10-15 min. And their rear glass is not anywhere near as vertical as the 4Runners is. Even the rear defroster on my old S10 worked twice as good as this one. This thing can barely defog by it self. I like this ride, but this rear defog/defrost issue is a big miss for Toyota, IMHO.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2003 | 04:38 AM
  #13  
lee's Avatar
lee
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
From: boston, ma
i agree, but in the long run, its best to have this to complain about than the car not starting, for example (::cough chevy / ford cough::)
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2003 | 08:54 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: West Virginia
sucks

The rear defroster does suck and I have had many cars in the past that worked alot better. I even had a 97 heep wranglar with a hard top and that thing worked great. I dont have many complaints about my new runner since the dunlops are gone but this is one.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedRunner_87
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
84
Jun 1, 2021 01:51 PM
MMA_Alex
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
25
Apr 18, 2017 05:07 AM
lledwod
Items Wanted
1
Aug 30, 2016 01:03 PM
Jnkml
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
Jul 6, 2015 01:20 PM
Vargntucson
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
Jul 4, 2015 12:15 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:09 AM.