Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

New 4Runner fender Flares(photos inside)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 02:24 PM
  #1  
lovetharunner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, OR
New 4Runner fender Flares(photos inside)

I haven't found much info on Yotatech regarding fender flairs, especially for the 4Runner. Seems like the options are either $350 Bushwackers, or ghetto fab some lawn-edging to your wheel well.

I decided to go on a journey to see what I could find. Interviewed some local off-road shops and explored the realms of Google. After surfing the Serious Exploration website (I know, I know), I found something that looked promising.

Pacer Performance 3" Heavy Duty Universal Fender Flair - $69.00 from JC Whitney

Some pictures from today:













I hope this helps someone else out there. Comments / criticism are welcome.

Joshua
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 02:29 PM
  #2  
prorunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Kelso, Washington
hah! I knew there was a universal fender flare, I've seen it on trucks in my town before, I just could never find out what the brand and where to get it was. I even tried asking around in my local auto parts store and they looked confused.

It doesn't look that bad at all, clean install. I wanted to do that to my gf's 3rd gen pickup to get the cops off her back but we ended up selling it :/

It looks pretty good.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 02:30 PM
  #3  
scuba's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 11,338
Likes: 120
From: Austin, Texas
It looks like some really expensive door sill stuff. And IMO looks no better then aforementioned ghetto fab lawn edge.

Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 02:33 PM
  #4  
Swimmerboy2112's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 3
From: Walnutport, PA
Looks pretty cheap Bushwacker is still the way to go it seems.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 02:34 PM
  #5  
vital22re's Avatar
totally a bro
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,158
Likes: 46
From: kick yer face
It looks good for UNIVERSAL. So it'll never be perfect, but looks better than I thought it was gonna.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 03:11 PM
  #6  
BigBluePile's Avatar
Contributing Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,191
Likes: 190
From: Sedro-Woolley, WA
Not bad for universal!
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 04:28 PM
  #7  
lovetharunner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, OR
Wow, not the response I was expecting from everyone...
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 05:40 PM
  #8  
prorunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Kelso, Washington
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 05:56 PM
  #9  
thook's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,656
Likes: 16
From: NW Ark on wooded ten acres...Ozarks at large!
Originally Posted by lovetharunner
Wow, not the response I was expecting from everyone...
Well, you did say comments/criticisms welcome. So, you got some snobs on YT. What's new???

Look just fine for the money spent. I mean, they are cheaply made and cheaply sold. They're not going to look as fancy as Bushwackers. But, damn.......those things are expensive. Screw that. Those do look better than some other universals I've seen. Be happy with what you got, man. To hell with the snobbery.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 06:15 PM
  #10  
BigBluePile's Avatar
Contributing Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,191
Likes: 190
From: Sedro-Woolley, WA
I would say those are BETTER than the rusting fender promoting bushwackers that actually COVER the fender...

Besides, I wouldn't feel bad about rippin one of those off on the trail as opposed to a brand new set of bushwackers. The ONLY reason I have a set of bushwackers is 'cause they are second hand and I got a deal on them. I DO NOT like having them on at all...stupid WA laws...
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 06:32 PM
  #11  
myyota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,166
Likes: 11
From: GrangeVille, Idaho
They may be cheap, but i think they actually look good.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 06:44 PM
  #12  
clydehatchet's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: KY
bushwacker may look better, but those seem to be a little more deflective from obstacles.
dont look too bad though.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 06:45 PM
  #13  
streetlancer's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: VA
Your truck looks good
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 07:10 PM
  #14  
lovetharunner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, OR
Originally Posted by thook
Well, you did say comments/criticisms welcome. So, you got some snobs on YT. What's new???

Look just fine for the money spent. I mean, they are cheaply made and cheaply sold. They're not going to look as fancy as Bushwackers. But, damn.......those things are expensive. Screw that. Those do look better than some other universals I've seen. Be happy with what you got, man. To hell with the snobbery.
Thanks thook! Don't get me wrong, I am happy with fender flairs, especially for what I paid. I just assumed there would be more people on this forum that were in the same situation as me... trying to be street legal on a very limited budget.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 07:37 PM
  #15  
thook's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,656
Likes: 16
From: NW Ark on wooded ten acres...Ozarks at large!
Oh, there are...haha. Mine's so limited I'll be fabricating my own out of free materials and a $15 can of fiberglass fill......hopefully. Many of my ideas never pan out quite the way I envisioned them. A big imagination can leave a lot of room for error.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 07:44 PM
  #16  
TOYOTA 1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 3
From: oregon
not bad for the money.

were you getting harassed or just being preventative ?
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 08:21 PM
  #17  
j944's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Bonney Lake, WA.
One of the better looking 2nd gens Ive seen. The universals do look better than expected.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 08:24 PM
  #18  
Teuf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,592
Likes: 24
From: Dixon, Ca
Fender flairs are funny, they have to flow well to look good. Now I understand function, and I am sure they function. But they look kinda odd. And any fender flairs made specific to my 88 look odd. Ps you need more back spacing. Nice 4 runner.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 08:44 PM
  #19  
Ron Helmuth's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 2
From: Denver metro area-CO
if they were painted to match the body color they would seem like less of an add on.

I was looking at these also some time back for my 3rd gen. -I would agree Bushwackers are over priced but well engineered. For a 2nd gen your solution is just fine and much more economical if they get damaged in use.

Appreciate your sharing the pics.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2010 | 04:57 AM
  #20  
thook's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,656
Likes: 16
From: NW Ark on wooded ten acres...Ozarks at large!
Originally Posted by Teuf
Fender flairs are funny, they have to flow well to look good. Now I understand function, and I am sure they function. But they look kinda odd. And any fender flairs made specific to my 88 look odd. Ps you need more back spacing. Nice 4 runner.
Haha....then he'd need wider flares. And, then, it'd look like a roller skate on steriods.....
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:19 PM.