Attack those spammers
#1
Thread Starter
Co-Founder/Administrator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 32,242
Likes: 21
From: Auburn, Washington
Attack those spammers
http://networks.silicon.com/webwatch...9126203,00.htm
Saw the link on CPUs magazine site.
http://www.computerpoweruser.com/
Saw the link on CPUs magazine site.
http://www.computerpoweruser.com/
#5
Originally Posted by data
I believe DOS'ing someone will get you a felony rather quickly...
Originally Posted by Cnet
Lycos Europe contends that the technology will create logistical problems for spammers. While the company said it does not intend to disable any site completely, it believes that it can overload sites based on the volume of spam created to advertise them. The company said the screen saver system uses an automated "health check" feature to ensure that its data requests never render any site completely inoperable.
#7
Originally Posted by Churnd
It doesn't matter. If you're getting into another computer without their knowledge, it's still illegal. Two wrongs don't make a right.
DOS (Denial of service) attacks are kinda in the Grey zone. Your not hacking into there computer. your simply flooding their netowrk connection, Either Making their internet extremly SLOW or knocking them off the internet all together.
SOunds Good to me.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by 4Hummer
DOS (Denial of service) attacks are kinda in the Grey zone. Your not hacking into there computer. your simply flooding their netowrk connection, Either Making their internet extremly SLOW or knocking them off the internet all together.
SOunds Good to me.

SOunds Good to me.

But denial-of-service attacks are illegal in a many countries and some organisations have criticised the move. Steve Linford, director of non-profit anti-spam organisation Spamhaus, has dedicated the last eight years of his life to fighting spammers. He said that Lycos has failed to think the idea through.
"It's irresponsible of Lycos to put its name to it because it lends legitimacy to [DDoS] attacks," said Linford. "You can't break into a thief's house just because he breaks into yours. We don't support this or recommend this practice. Directing traffic is part of the degradation of the internet we are trying to stop."
"It's irresponsible of Lycos to put its name to it because it lends legitimacy to [DDoS] attacks," said Linford. "You can't break into a thief's house just because he breaks into yours. We don't support this or recommend this practice. Directing traffic is part of the degradation of the internet we are trying to stop."
#10
I heard about this a few days ago from a friend of mine. I was thinking about it, and its really in a grey area. I think if the screen saver looks for spyware on your system then it should be able to use it for whatever purpose. If it has some built in list it floods I dont think thats a good idea. If someone installs something onto my computer without my knowledge then I should be able to use it against them. Although in a court case my statement wouldnt hold water, but morally I should be allowed. If you dont want to be flooded then dont install things on my computer, easy as that.
#11
Originally Posted by CynicX
I heard about this a few days ago from a friend of mine. I was thinking about it, and its really in a grey area. I think if the screen saver looks for spyware on your system then it should be able to use it for whatever purpose. If it has some built in list it floods I dont think thats a good idea. If someone installs something onto my computer without my knowledge then I should be able to use it against them. Although in a court case my statement wouldnt hold water, but morally I should be allowed. If you dont want to be flooded then dont install things on my computer, easy as that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



My thoughts exactly. I've been tempted a few times myself
Shh...
