The Fab Shop Tube buggies, armor protection and anything else that requires cutting, welding, or custom fab work

3rd Gen SAS Help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 5, 2005 | 06:25 PM
  #41  
Flygtenstein's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 1
From: Fort Collins, CO
You swap because you can, I agree. I just hate people bagging on IFS when they have been driving dirt roads.

I have completely lost faith in my equipment. I do not like wheeling my rig anymore because I am afraid the next break will be the big one, the one that cannot be limped off and fixed.

Personally, I helped with Steve's and would like to see Jeff's, but wouldn't do that to my rig if I had a 3rd Gen. Doing it right or nice takes time and bucks. Sure your uncle's cousin's brother's wife did a swap for 5 dollars, but I bet it was a piece of crap.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 03:59 PM
  #42  
4WDDIVA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SteveO
hmmmm.....I would say god of his own fertile imagination

Would that be organic fertilizer?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 04:27 PM
  #43  
SteveO's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: NM
Originally Posted by 4WDDIVA
Would that be organic fertilizer?
Hmmmm

well, your closest to him, you would know.....
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 06:16 AM
  #44  
sschaefer3's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,278
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
Originally Posted by SteveO
God of the 3rd Gen 4Runner world.......

hmmmm.....I would say god of his own fertile imagination
I guess that would make YOU the Queen, Mr. Hunt.

Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 06:19 AM
  #45  
SteveO's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: NM
Originally Posted by sschaefer3
I guess that would make YOU the Queen, Mr. Hunt.

Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 06:38 AM
  #46  
bamachem's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by 4WDDIVA
Would that be organic fertilizer?
oh, most definitely of the organic, composted variety...
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 06:41 AM
  #47  
sschaefer3's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,278
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
Originally Posted by bamachem
oh, most definitely of the organic, composted variety...
Well If I'm the King and Hunt is the Queen, you with the Tundra concept certainly qualify for the "Princess" status.

Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 06:48 AM
  #48  
bamachem's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by sschaefer3
Well If I'm the King and Hunt is the Queen, you with the Tundra concept certainly qualify for the "Princess" status.

ouch... you know, just cause you dropped a second mortgage on that funky steel thing under the front of your runner doesn't mean that i still couldn't outwheel ya.. get that thing out here and let's hit tellico... you need to come have fun somewhere OTHER than the desert - east tennessee style...
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 04:14 PM
  #49  
44Runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
From: Mount Pleasant, SC
Originally Posted by bamachem
ouch... you know, just cause you dropped a second mortgage on that funky steel thing under the front of your runner doesn't mean that i still couldn't outwheel ya.. get that thing out here and let's hit tellico... you need to come have fun somewhere OTHER than the desert - east tennessee style...
you know steve has no idea what to do when there is mud. I don't have the infamous pic, but I am sure someone will be whipping it out shorty if this thread continues down this track...
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 04:32 PM
  #50  
Albuquerque Jim's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
In Steve's defense...looks like there was a little mud on the Rubicon

Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 05:02 PM
  #51  
calrockx's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,749
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clarita, California
yeah, there was ton of mud on the con, under some moderately deep water.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 04:27 PM
  #52  
BruceTS's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
I'm the Joker of the bunch!

Yep, the Rubicon was quite WET! I had passed by a few weeks prior to their event and drove through heavy rains and snow. Since I just finished another muddy run, I had no desire to do it again, besides at work I played in mud every day. I will be attending Marlins round-up in September, shoud be a better by then....

I like the direction SteveO is going with his SAS, but his choice of axle housing color has little-to-be-desired

cubuff4runner's rig, came out awesome.......


44Runner's did an excellent job on his and I can't figure out why nobody has purchased it yet???

RunnerUp, If you were smart, sell the 02 since that model year is one of the worst to SAS. If you really want to do the mods, buy 44Runner's rig and convert the rear suspension, so it flexes like the front.

With all that said, I can't see a reason to go SAS on a 3rd gen since they aren't even a decent base vehicle to start from. Personally I'd get a older Taco and convert it instead....... Better yet read my sig......
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 01:12 AM
  #53  
MellamoPOUND's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Originally Posted by BruceTS
With all that said, I can't see a reason to go SAS on a 3rd gen since they aren't even a decent base vehicle to start from.
Now you just broke everyones hearts and dreams :cry: j/j

What makes it not a decent base vehicle..... heavy, weak frame, what else?
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 06:25 AM
  #54  
BruceTS's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MellamoPOUND
Now you just broke everyones hearts and dreams :cry: j/j

What makes it not a decent base vehicle..... heavy, weak frame, what else?

Where to start.......

The front section of the frame wasn't designed to handle the loading that is put onto it, when a leaf style SAS is done. Much of the bracing is cut out, but no additional support is installed afterwards. To do it properly, you'll need to plate the complete front half of the frame rail, which I don't see done. Many rigs that have gone SAS are now experiencing frame failures, BlingTaco needed some emergency welding on his Taco up in Big Bear, there were cracks all over the front half. I know Jason Demello had to add extensive bracing to his Taco after he did the coilover set-up. Now you add the additional weight of a 3rd gen 4Runner to the equasion, things will happen faster.

Going SAS will make trails that were difficult to do IFS easier, so you'll want to challenge yourself by trying much more difficult lines, unfortunately our rigs are way too top heavy to attempt the trails that many of my friends frequent with their truggies.

The work required to go SAS on a 3rd gen vs. 2nd gen is at least twice as much....

Even though I have the skills needed to do a SAS, I couldn't justify doing so much work for very little advantage. I'd rather start from scratch and build a buggy, that way I'd have that much more fun and not have to worry about body damage or rolling it. The clock is ticking on the SAS'ed 3rd gens to see who's gonna be the first to roll it......

cubuff4runner's rig rides on 37's which is the only reason I can see to go SAS, since the IFS can't handle that size tire, but it's use as a daily driver becomes limited. Personally I like the way my rig handles on the highway, but then again the "Cool" factor is priceless, so maybe we all should go SAS...
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 07:05 AM
  #55  
MellamoPOUND's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
So pretty much, if you add a lot of extra bracing and support to the frame rails, chop off most of the roof to help with it being top heavy and put in a roll cage... your dandy!
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 08:56 AM
  #56  
44Runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
From: Mount Pleasant, SC
My 3rd gen frame is much beefier than my 85's frame. SA frames are tiny up front granted there is less weight on them. I think most people are having problems on late model frames due to the extreme amount of undercutting found on the welds that hold the IFS brackets on. I know I had some but I have seen it BAD on other peoples frames. I cannot say this for sure as I have never seen one crack but my gut tells me that probably had something to do with it...


And on the subject of my truck....yeah, what the hell's up with that? lol

Last edited by 44Runner; Aug 12, 2005 at 08:57 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 10:00 AM
  #57  
Volcom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo, CO
Originally Posted by BruceTS
cubuff4runner's rig rides on 37's which is the only reason I can see to go SAS, since the IFS can't handle that size tire, but it's use as a daily driver becomes limited. Personally I like the way my rig handles on the highway, but then again the "Cool" factor is priceless, so maybe we all should go SAS...
He daily drives his rig about 50 miles round trip. The 4Runner handles great on the highway, even at 75-80 mph.

Last edited by Volcom; Aug 12, 2005 at 10:04 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 01:27 PM
  #58  
SteveO's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: NM
Originally Posted by BruceTS
.....I like the direction SteveO is going with his SAS, but his choice of axle housing color has little-to-be-desired
..........

In real life, the paint is actually Red. I don't know why the pictures seem to come out an off orange....

Yes, I know Red, why red?

Its a hot rig, so I figured red and green chili to compliment the hot rig of the southwest.....


I know, cheesy...


Reply
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 04:39 PM
  #59  
sgirt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
I am liking SteveO's SAS. I feel for the 3rd gen, coil springs are the way to go. I am hoping someone comes out with a weld on kit similar to All Pro's kit for the 86 - 95's. I used their SAS kit for my '89 pickup. I have the ability, but not to the extent of SteveO or some of the others.

Frame wise, I feel the 86 - 95 frames appeared to be more condusive for a leaf sprug solid axle. I agree, with an above post. The 79 - 85 frame is much smaller in comparison but has better angles for the live front axle. I thought several years ago there were a lot of problems with the 79 - 85 frames cracking just before the front hanger.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 05:45 AM
  #60  
awsumdc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
There are issues with the '05 Tacomas and sasing it. The 05 is totally fly by wire and was posing some issue's with where to pick up the speed senors since they are on all 4 wheels and not at the tranny or the transfer case. But with the help of some engineers and Toyota we should have that problem solved shortly.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
suppra87
Tires & Wheels
9
Jul 15, 2021 05:15 PM
Swampwalker
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
5
Oct 12, 2015 09:49 AM
RickyD
Solid Axle Swaps, All Years
6
Oct 2, 2015 07:53 AM
runnermedic
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
13
Sep 21, 2015 05:20 PM
Flying91
Solid Axle Swaps, All Years
0
Sep 10, 2015 03:41 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:47 PM.