Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section) Post your build-ups here

Supercharged Compression Test #'s / Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2013, 02:36 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bgreenlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Supercharged Compression Test #'s / Question

Picked up a '96 4Runner a couple of months ago from it's original owner. It has 140k miles and has been supercharged for the last 80k of them. No fuel mods.

It seems to run fine and I haven't detected any audible pinging in the couple of months I've had it, but I'd still like to get it setup correctly with the URD 7th injector kit and go ahead and go to a 2.1" pulley while I'm at it.

Since the s/c is at 80K miles (1st gen), I'm considering going ahead and having it rebuilt.

Before I dump a ton of money into it I wanted to make sure the motor is in good health- especially since it's been run for a long time without any of the fuel upgrades.

If it's not in good shape, I'll refrain from putting any money into it and just run the motor until it blows. But if all is well, I want to get it set up right for good.

Did a compression test this previous weekend and came up with these #'s:

#1: 200
#2: 195
#3: 175
#4: 195
#5: 195
#6: 195

Obviously an outlier on cylinder 3. Recommended #'s are supposed to be 175 with a maximum cylinder difference of 15, however, all of my cylinders are around ~195 with a single one 20psi less.

I know cylinder 3 would also be where I could expect to see cracked heads if that were the case, but I don't seem to be losing any coolant and I would imagine the psi would be much lower than 175 if there truly were such an issue.

As a test, we dumped a capfull of oil into cylinder 3 and tested again. It came up to 185psi. This also seemed inconclusive to me- came up a bit, but not enough to directly mean much?

My #'s don't seem actually bad to me, but I really wish #3 was 5psi higher or so - would have gone a long way in making me feel more confident about dropping the money in it and meaning the engine really was in great condition to start with.

In any case, what do you guys think? Anything to be concerned about?
Or should I just keep an eye on it and dive into getting the fuel mods done, getting the s/c rebuilt, and upping the boost slightly....
Old 10-16-2013, 03:48 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
HighLux's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ofallon Missouri
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
did you do it cold? did you do it with all plugs out and throttle wide open?
Old 10-16-2013, 04:55 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bgreenlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HighLux
did you do it cold? did you do it with all plugs out and throttle wide open?
Warm engine and all plugs out with wide open throttle.
Old 10-16-2013, 05:24 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Kiroshu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Well considering cylinder compression for the 3.4 5VZ-FE is:

-218 PSI Standard

-145 PSI Minimum

I would say those are pretty healthy numbers considering mileage.

The wet compression test you performed showed that some of the compression loss is through worn piston components and or cylinder bore.

The lowest cylinder reading is 10% less than the highest cylinder reading which is ok.

Anything more than 15-20% difference is highly noticeable, usually by the engines performance, and obviously not acceptable.
Old 10-16-2013, 05:37 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
HighLux's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ofallon Missouri
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
I think you are ok. Its got some miles ya know?

This is a case of its not broke dont fix it.

one slightly weak cylinder does not necessitate (sp) a rebuild.
Old 10-16-2013, 06:41 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bgreenlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the responses! It does help re-assure me. I know the numbers aren't necessarily "bad", but that one cylinder being down 25psi from my highest one did give me a bit of concern.

Is it strange that it's so localized to one cylinder like that?

Also, I should clarify that the rebuild I mentioned was a rebuild of the supercharger not of the engine itself. Just wanted to make sure the motor is all good to go before having the s/c worked on and potentially upping the boost a bit with the 2.1" pulley.

Thanks!

Last edited by bgreenlee; 10-16-2013 at 06:45 PM.
Old 10-16-2013, 07:02 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
HighLux's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ofallon Missouri
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
I dont advocate turning the boost up...lol. I think the blower is more than likely the cause of the lower compression cylinder. I wouldnt beat on her too much. Maybe make the boost you are making more efficient. Intercooler and some meth injection.
Old 10-16-2013, 08:19 PM
  #8  
totally a bro
Staff
iTrader: (2)
 
vital22re's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: kick yer face
Posts: 8,158
Received 45 Likes on 28 Posts
Do not jump up to the lower pulleys unless you're ready to sink up to 2k into it. factory should be 2.3 but some dealers installed a bigger pulley to compensate for the ping. I'd rather leave it as is and just run a methanol injection kit with controller.
Old 10-17-2013, 03:34 AM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bgreenlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vital22re
Do not jump up to the lower pulleys unless you're ready to sink up to 2k into it. factory should be 2.3 but some dealers installed a bigger pulley to compensate for the ping. I'd rather leave it as is and just run a methanol injection kit with controller.
I should have said 2.2" pulley instead of 2.1".

BUT I'll skip doing even the 2.2" pulley if it really seems like a big risk take. In that case, I am still going to have the s/c rebuilt and do the urd 7th injector since these two things should be done anyways. I just didn't want to spend on the money on doing them if the consensus was that this engine might be on it's last leg anyways.

Any chance that 80k supercharged miles without the proper supporting fuel mods could be to blame for the #3 issues?

Again, I haven't heard any audible pinging- even when I've tried to force it to test with high gear / low rpms / heavy throttle, but I've only owned the truck for the last 1k miles. (I realize damage could be done even if the pinging isn't audible.)
Old 10-17-2013, 06:44 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
HighLux's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ofallon Missouri
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
I know from personal and exspensive experience, that if you dont have enough fuel on a blown motor.....it will reveal itself very quickly and with catostrophic results.

I think its just from the extra cylinder pressure over the course of alot of supercharged miles.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
the1998sr5
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
15
07-14-2020 08:35 PM
the1998sr5
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
27
11-17-2015 09:30 AM
thefishguy77
Newbie Tech Section
10
07-30-2015 10:59 AM
anniesball
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
07-29-2015 11:46 AM
Cplmike
Newbie Tech Section
5
07-08-2015 08:47 PM



Quick Reply: Supercharged Compression Test #'s / Question



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:43 AM.