95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Tacoma vs Ranger suspension - differences?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 05:08 PM
  #1  
baileymoto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Tacoma vs Ranger suspension - differences?

Sorry for this newbie post. I currently have a 2001 chevrolet silverado Z71 that i will be selling and then 'downgrading' (if you even want to call it that) to a smaller pickup. I am wanting to go with a 2wd setup and eventually turn it into something fun for the local dunes. anywho....quick question, what are the differences in suspension designs between the yota and ranger? are the yotas a-arm design similar to my silverado? what are the rangers? are they an 'i-beam' setup? im not very familiar with either one of these setups so any info would help out.

what suspension setup is easier and cheaper to work with? on that note, id prefer to stay away from the 'yota is better than ranger' or vis versa arguments.


thanks!

Justin
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 05:12 PM
  #2  
waskillywabbit's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 20
Talking Versus

I can't fit in a Ranger and I fit in a Taco easily. 6'2" 225 lbs plus come on, it's a Ford...

Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 05:14 PM
  #3  
Bob_98SR5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 5
From: Los Angeles
Justin,

The biggest difference is one breaks and the other doesnt.

Ok, all joking aside, my answer is "I don't know". Hopefully someone here will enlighten you.

However I did want to comment and say "buy a 4wd" and not a 2wd. I know there's several people that I've wheeled with that do the dunes and trails rather successfully w/o 2wd, but to have the capability (and security) of a 4wd would be a good thing to have since you have a choice to purchase one or the other.

bob
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 05:16 PM
  #4  
baileymoto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Bob_98SR5
Justin,

The biggest difference is one breaks and the other doesnt.

Ok, all joking aside, my answer is "I don't know". Hopefully someone here will enlighten you.

However I did want to comment and say "buy a 4wd" and not a 2wd. I know there's several people that I've wheeled with that do the dunes and trails rather successfully w/o 2wd, but to have the capability (and security) of a 4wd would be a good thing to have since you have a choice to purchase one or the other.

bob
altho, i dont know a great deal about the suspension setups i have figured out that i would like to eventually go with some sort of long suspension setup that can handle a decent amount of jumping. as far as i know, these sorts of suspension setups are not available for 4x4's. i could be wrong, shrug.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 05:37 PM
  #5  
calrockx's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,749
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clarita, California
i don't know for sure about this, but i've heard stock rangers have pretty long wheel travel up in front.

but i'd still go with a toyota. both can be built up quite nicely, but only the tacoma has the proven reliability.

there are a couple long travel kits available for 4wd, but the ones for 2wd are easier to find and offer more travel than the 4wd versions. i think, correct me if i'm wrong someone.

check out http://www.camburg.com/suspensionprod.html for suspension setups on both trucks.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 05:45 PM
  #6  
ElwayLite's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, Alabama
The new rangers dont have the beam anymore, but the older ones do. Im not sure on which truck has a better suspension to mod and other things in that area, but I can tell you that I had a ranger for 4 years(4spd auto, stepside, v6) and it has nothing on my 01 prerunner. More power, better ride, better quality, better truck.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 05:50 PM
  #7  
baileymoto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ElwayLite
The new rangers dont have the beam anymore, but the older ones do. Im not sure on which truck has a better suspension to mod and other things in that area, but I can tell you that I had a ranger for 4 years(4spd auto, stepside, v6) and it has nothing on my 01 prerunner. More power, better ride, better quality, better truck.
what years are the newer generation rangers? also, what suspension setups do the different generation yotas have?
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 06:14 PM
  #8  
ElwayLite's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, Alabama
I'm new to the yota's and have no clue.

ranger:

1997 was the last year of the i-beam front suspension
1998 it went to wishbones and coil springs
1999 added rack and pinion steering



Another area is fuel mileage, fords drink gas, my 01 prerunner with the 3.4 auto averages 17.5 city, my ranger with an auto did worse than that with less power.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 06:18 PM
  #9  
baileymoto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ElwayLite
I'm new to the yota's and have no clue.

ranger:

1997 was the last year of the i-beam front suspension
1998 it went to wishbones and coil springs
1999 added rack and pinion steering



Another area is fuel mileage, fords drink gas, my 01 prerunner with the 3.4 auto averages 17.5 city, my ranger with an auto did worse than that with less power.
what would you consider a better/easier/cheaper/whatever setup between the 97 and 98/99?
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 06:20 PM
  #10  
ElwayLite's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, Alabama
Well, I did more work on lowering than raising, but the ibeam suspension is not near as good as the newer setup, better ride too. The ibeams were ancient and should have been done away with long before. If you do get a ranger, get a 98+ with no less than the 4.0L.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 08:07 PM
  #11  
RedRunner_87's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 2
From: Fort Collins, CO
Originally Posted by ElwayLite
Well, I did more work on lowering than raising, but the ibeam suspension is not near as good as the newer setup, better ride too. The ibeams were ancient and should have been done away with long before. If you do get a ranger, get a 98+ with no less than the 4.0L.
Here are some pics of I-Beam supension, that has some major mods to it. I would have to disagree with you, the I-beam suspension is very strong and you can get good travel out it. I do agree with the 4.0 thought, good engine.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 08:09 PM
  #12  
pinnacle's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: Simi Valley, Ca
I have a '97 ranger with the camburg coilover system on it. I think I-beams are a little cheaper to build a long travel setup for, you can get more travel but camber change becomes a problem. Their is a lot more fab work to do with the '98 and up rangers. '01 rangers I believe went to torsion bars instead of coils. As for 2wd or 4wd, with the pre '98 rangers you can get just about the same amount of travel but the 4wd will cost a lot more. With the 98 and above rangers there is no long travel available yet, unless you go totally custom fab.

That is my truck in the above link.

Here are a couple of videos that have both a-arm and I-beams

clicky #1

clicky #2

Last edited by pinnacle; Mar 18, 2004 at 09:20 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 08:22 PM
  #13  
RedRunner_87's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 2
From: Fort Collins, CO
If you go with a Taco ESB Fab makes a kit for it. I have some more pics of the Ranger if you want them. I think Total Chaos also makes a kit for the Taco.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 08:25 PM
  #14  
Mossback74's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Just looked over a bud's new ranger, Its got Torsion bars! They really hang down there too
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 08:45 PM
  #15  
pinnacle's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: Simi Valley, Ca
Here is a good discussion on A-Arms Vs. I-Beams
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 10:27 AM
  #16  
baileymoto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
thanks
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2004 | 10:57 PM
  #17  
Robinhood150's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,033
Likes: 3
From: Wandering around Phoenix
Here's a discussion on Pirate about 2wds at the dunes. The general concensus is that it sucks, 4wd is best. A locker helps though.

http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showt...5&pagenumber=1
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2004 | 12:20 PM
  #18  
BankOwns's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: East Central NC
www.therangerstation.com has alot of info on the rangers. IMHO 2WD sand setups have to be pretty spendy to compete with even a stock 4WD. They are fun to drive but they have to be light and powerful.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yotadawgjr
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
10
Aug 23, 2015 10:51 AM
coffey50
Offroad Tech
17
Jul 28, 2015 10:55 AM
94whiterunner
Items Wanted
0
Jul 12, 2015 07:15 PM
Vargntucson
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
Jul 4, 2015 12:15 PM
CJ94yota
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
2
Jul 3, 2015 10:14 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:36 PM.