95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Question about Gears???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2002 | 07:36 PM
  #1  
Stump1883's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
From: High Point NC
Question about Gears???

Hey guys I really want to know about gears, and re-gearing. 3:56, 4:10 what does it all mean. What are better gears for off-raoding and why, what makes them better? Please help me out, I have alway wiondered and wanted to understand these things when you guys talk about them. Thanks in advance, I know you guys will always come through.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2002 | 07:59 PM
  #2  
jx94148's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,617
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Its expressed as a ratio. 4.10 means 4.1 to 1. the drive shafts turn 4.1 times for every 1 time the wheels turn. 4.88 means 4.88 driveshaft turns for every 1 wheel turn etc. The higher the number the better for offroading because the motor turns more times over the same distance. You can go slower over big rocks without stalling.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2002 | 08:17 PM
  #3  
Churnd
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
just in case you didn't already know, we're talking about the gears in your differentials. well in your case, differential. depends on what kind of wheeling you do. if you like the fast pre-runner stuff, higher (numerically lower) gearing is what you want. if you like to climb stuff where slower speeds are used, lower (numerically higher) gearing is the way to go. also, if you upgrade your tires to a larger size, you can re-gear the differentials to offset the upgrade to where your truck will drive like stock. it's all about picking the right combo. if you research a little, you'll find other people who had the same question you do and the decision they made. all that said, your best bet is to try to keep everything as close to stock as possible. like, if you upgrade to 35" tires, you're gonna want to go with 5.29 gears to offset the difference and return performance to normal.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2002 | 08:40 PM
  #4  
Flygtenstein's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 1
From: Fort Collins, CO
Pre-running requires gears that are numerically higher so as to not limit the upper end of speed.

Crawling requires numerically lower gears get get maximum torque multiplication.

I have 5.29's with 33's and love it.

Ballpark:
3.0, auto, 33's=5.29's
3.0, stick, 33's=4.88's
3.4, auto, 33's=4.88's
3.4, stick, 33's=4.56's
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2002 | 04:19 AM
  #5  
CTB's Avatar
CTB
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
From: SC
Got a question for y'all:

So, just say I upgraded my tires to 33's - by installing 5.29 gears, would I be gaining back the acceleration I lost by going to 33's?

Just so I have my ideas straight:

Lower gearing (higher numerically) = faster acceleration
Higher gearing (lower numerically) = faster top-end speed

Is this right?

Thanks for the help guys-

CTB
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2002 | 06:10 AM
  #6  
cybrenergy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Mount Airy, MD
Originally posted by CTB
Got a question for y'all:

So, just say I upgraded my tires to 33's - by installing 5.29 gears, would I be gaining back the acceleration I lost by going to 33's?

Just so I have my ideas straight:

Lower gearing (higher numerically) = faster acceleration
Higher gearing (lower numerically) = faster top-end speed

Is this right?

Thanks for the help guys-

CTB
You are right about your lower / higher gearing assumptions!
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2002 | 06:28 AM
  #7  
CTB's Avatar
CTB
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
From: SC
Cool, thanks.

And just a little addition to my previous post:

Lower Gearing (higher numerically) = faster acceleration (and higher highway rpm's?)

Higher Gearing (lower numerically) = faster top-end speed (and lower highway rpm's?)

Am I right with the rpm assumptions? Thanks again fellas-
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2002 | 06:39 AM
  #8  
Jay's Avatar
Jay
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 569
Likes: 2
From: Beaverton, OR
Am I right with the rpm assumptions?
Yes.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2002 | 06:54 AM
  #9  
CTB's Avatar
CTB
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
From: SC
Great, thanks Jay
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2002 | 06:54 AM
  #10  
Stump1883's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
From: High Point NC
Ah I love this forum. You pople here are the best damn friends to learn from. Thanks for all the help. Now I can put up another little knoledge point under my name. Now to just learn even more about gears now that I get th basics of it al. Thanks again, you guys are a big help.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2002 | 12:35 PM
  #11  
Flygtenstein's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 1
From: Fort Collins, CO
On my 95 runner, I went from 31's with 4.56's to 33's with 5.29's.

It feels faster than it did with 31's, but that is because I now drive it a little heavier. Run the tach around 3k and that will produce better mileage and some power.

When I was breaking in the gears with 31's it was a rocket off the line.

You can crunch numbers and stuff to get in the right area, but the real world is different than numbers. The calculations forget about increased mass, rolling resistance and contact area.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XtraCab
Solid Axle Swaps, All Years
18
Apr 12, 2020 05:25 AM
oldirtydirt
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
3
Feb 23, 2020 09:30 AM
mskalmus
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
9
May 28, 2017 07:51 AM
coffey50
Offroad Tech
17
Jul 28, 2015 10:55 AM
Jnkml
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
Jul 6, 2015 01:20 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:21 AM.