Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

New vehicles and Doo-dads...no substance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-2003, 05:07 AM
  #1  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
gwhayduke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
New vehicles and Doo-dads...no substance

My wife dragged me to the Ford dealer last weekend to "look." Well I looked....and left.

She had been noticing the good mileage of the little Ford Escape...which is only available with a manual tranny on the 4cyl...not the V6.

But after looking at everything there I decided that there wasn't anything there that made me want to endure 5 years of sweat. I still love my 95 4Runner with it's manual tranny and I just don't see anything innovative out there (other than the hydrid vehicles.

So I took my money and went home.
Old 03-08-2003, 05:29 AM
  #2  
Contributing Member
 
Paul H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 7,454
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Glad you left, remember, the Escape has had something like 10 safety recalls since it came out.
Old 03-08-2003, 06:33 AM
  #3  
Guest
 
oly884's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My parents test drove one and I must say that my truck sitting on 33's was quieter on the road than that thing.
Old 03-08-2003, 10:03 AM
  #4  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
gwhayduke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Took the 4Runner in this morning for the dealer to replace the rear output shaft seal on the transfer case. Test drove a new 4Runner SR5 V8 and a Highlander Limited, both priced at about 33K.

At 70 mph, the V8 was spinning at about 2100 rpm, compared with my '95 at about 3200 rpm. The 4runner was smoother and quieter than the Highlander. Toyota rates the V6 4wd at 1 mpg more than the V8 which happens to have the same EPA gas mileage as my 95 (19mpg).

I'm just trying to imagine that new Runner with Malamute hair in it.
Old 03-08-2003, 10:14 AM
  #5  
Contributing Member
 
Woodbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That Escape is tiny also. I mean really small compared to the Runner.
Old 03-08-2003, 02:41 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Babypig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The oil pans are made of aluminum as well. Doesn't bounce off rocks to well, speaking from experience. luckily it was for a tv show so we handed back ford an escape minus an engine.
Old 03-08-2003, 02:53 PM
  #7  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
gwhayduke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
We didn't even take one for a test drive. I'm just not a Ford fan. Although I have to drive about 35 minutes to get service (Las Cruces Toyota) and the Ford, Honda & Jaguar dealers are just a couple of miles away, I'm just not sold on Ford's better idea.

That new 4Runner has me thinking though. For all the beating it's taken here on the board, it was the quietest, most comfortable, and easiest cruiser I've been in in quite a while.

Don't know what it's like offroad, but that's prbably why I'd keep the 95.
Old 03-08-2003, 06:16 PM
  #8  
Contributing Member
 
tomus1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Wallingford, Ct
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't forget that the Mazda Tribute is the same vehicle as the Escape. Zoom...Zoom...

Last edited by tomus1000; 03-08-2003 at 07:49 PM.
Old 03-08-2003, 06:30 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
jharris2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On a business trip to Austin a few months back, the rental agency handed me the keys to an Escape. It was a windy day, and I couldn't believe how hard I had to fight to keep from being blown off the road.

Net -- I got a 3-day test drive at company expense and learned that it wasn't a car I'd want to own.
Old 03-08-2003, 07:36 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Cebby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by gwhayduke
happens to have the same EPA gas mileage as my 95 (19mpg).
19MPG? That had to be downhill. Mine has never given me that kind of mileage (before the mods of course)
Old 03-08-2003, 07:51 PM
  #11  
Contributing Member
 
tomus1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Wallingford, Ct
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Must be because yours is a '93. The extra wear and tear ya know.
Old 03-08-2003, 08:12 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Cebby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by tomus1000
Must be because yours is a '93. The extra wear and tear ya know.
I bought it in 95 though...
Old 03-09-2003, 08:01 AM
  #13  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
gwhayduke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I routinely get 19mpg on the 95.
Get 17 at 70-75 fighting a headwind.
Just got the injectors cleaned and put a glasspack on it. But I'm swapping that out to a 2.25 cat-back with a LOOOOONG Magnaflow. We'll see what that does to the mpg.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
justdifferentials
Just Differentials
5
06-13-2022 07:40 PM
justdifferentials
Vendors Build-Ups (Build-Up Section)
14
06-11-2017 08:36 PM
scheuvront1993
Newbie Tech Section
8
09-17-2015 06:17 PM
matt1833
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
09-16-2015 07:11 AM
Anthony Lee Mathis
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
1
09-15-2015 07:22 AM



Quick Reply: New vehicles and Doo-dads...no substance



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:25 AM.