Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Mid size comparisons

Old 12-22-2003, 01:24 PM
  #1  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
instntset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mid size comparisons

Heres the side by side comparisons of the new 4Runner and other mid sized SUV's. It looks like the 4Runner would be the clear choice out of all 5 shown together.

comparisons

Last edited by instntset; 12-22-2003 at 01:26 PM.
Old 12-22-2003, 03:17 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
tenfourtyeight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd take the Jeep. I hate when half the outside is plastic.
Old 12-22-2003, 03:26 PM
  #3  
Contributing Member
 
Jonathan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by tenfourtyeight
I'd take the Jeep. I hate when half the outside is plastic.
I'd take the Runner. I hate when my truck breaks down at 30k miles
Old 12-22-2003, 03:40 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
r854rnr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by tenfourtyeight
I'd take the Jeep. I hate when half the outside is plastic.
Have the Grand Cherokees changed? What I remember is a large amount of plastic trim on the bottom of the doors, along with a massive plastic front and rear bumper.

I too would take the 4runner, but not from that comparison. The numbers aren't the whole story. Piece of mind, experiances with other brands, resale, and more awe big parts!
Old 12-22-2003, 03:41 PM
  #5  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
instntset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Jeep sure falls short in the horsepower category. That I-6 in the Jeep has far less power than all the others and falls way short of the 245 HP of the 4Runner

Reliabilty is a given. Chrysler v. Toyota. hmmmmm....

Last edited by instntset; 12-22-2003 at 03:42 PM.
Old 12-22-2003, 10:18 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
tenfourtyeight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was going purely by looks in the pictures. I said nothing about reliability, performance, etc.
Old 12-23-2003, 02:53 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
r854rnr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by instntset
The Jeep sure falls short in the horsepower category. That I-6 in the Jeep has far less power than all the others and falls way short of the 245 HP of the 4Runner
Doesn't the Jeep YJ still come with a 4.7L V8? with something like 230HP? ok, I just changed things around so it is a little more fair. Bumped everything up to it's best level (i.e. limited, overland...) and it is a much more even match. Jeep and Ford now have a 4.7L 265HP and 4.6L 239HP V8 respectively.

So, like me previous post says: It's not all about the numbers, as they can usually be manipulated in anybody's direction.

Here is what I canged everything to.
Old 12-23-2003, 05:51 AM
  #8  
Contributing Member
 
Jonathan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by tenfourtyeight
I was going purely by looks in the pictures. I said nothing about reliability, performance, etc.
I know man, I was just kidding with you. It's just that I don't care if it looks better if I can't enjoy it because it's in the shop all the time. My dad was a service manager for a Jeep dealership, so I know first hand all the problems with the Grand Cherokee. No hard feelings, I just have a sort of dry sense of humor sometimes
Old 12-23-2003, 06:16 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
FirstToy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like the looks of the Grand Cherokee just fine and believe me, I don't think the 4R is some beauty queen but have you seen the two parked side by side?

The 4R has more ground clearance, the rear bumper is higher off the ground and the whole truck looks beefier than the Jeep. From the front the 4R kicks the Jeeps butt on looks alone (imo). Park them side by side and judge for yourself.

The only other thing I like about the Jeep is that SFA. The Jeep's V8 numbers might be up there with the I-Force but look at the torque curve to tell you the true tale of smoothness, pull and driveability. I-Force wins hands down.
Old 12-23-2003, 09:29 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
tenfourtyeight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would take the 4Runner, too. I mean, it's a Toyota. I think my opinion may be a little different on the looks if the Runner was black/ black, too.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
smilen724
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
13
11-08-2015 04:11 PM
Gravel Maker
RuffStuff
2
10-04-2015 10:26 AM
oldblue
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
0
09-28-2015 04:07 PM
gp66
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
4
09-14-2015 12:10 AM
Gravel Maker
RuffStuff
1
09-08-2015 05:46 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Mid size comparisons



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:12 PM.