95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

EGR Advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2004 | 05:53 PM
  #1  
The Rusty Gear's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 56
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton, Canada
EGR Advice

Busted my EGR. Looking for options. I heard some people "block" their EGR??? What is involved and is that an option in my case? (see photo)
Attached Thumbnails EGR Advice-egr.jpg  
Reply
Old May 12, 2004 | 06:30 PM
  #2  
The Rusty Gear's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 56
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton, Canada
Originally Posted by ChickenLover
All your egr does is reroute exhaust back into your intake to burn the fuel that didn't get used the first time around. It just makes emissions a little cleaner. I don't see why you couldn't just block it. Go to the hardware store and find a plug that fits the threads or make one and weld it on.

Of course, you'd have to block the other end too, or you'd have a leaky intake :pat: How did you break that thing anyway?
Too much rust and a pipe wrench.

Recirculating exhaust into the intake . . . Will stopping this likely cause an increase or decrease in fuel economy (ALL the fuel gets used vs higher proportion of "clean" air in combustion chamber) ?

Last edited by The Rusty Gear; May 12, 2004 at 06:34 PM.
Reply
Old May 12, 2004 | 06:35 PM
  #3  
mike_d's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Mountains outside of Boulder
Originally Posted by ChickenLover
All your egr does is reroute exhaust back into your intake to burn the fuel that didn't get used the first time around. It just makes emissions a little cleaner.
no, it's not to burn fuel that didn't get used the second time around. the idea is that exhaust gasses don't burn (they're already burnt). so if you add some inert gasses to the cylinder and it dilutes the oxygen and causes everything to burn cooler. cooler combustion temps form fewer nox and hence less smog. however it's less efficient and lowers milage by about 10% or so. with blocked egr you'll not pass any smog tests in your area, so make sure you can easily put the egr back on for tests. i'm actually planning on bypassing my egr so that i can get a bit better milage.
Reply
Old May 12, 2004 | 06:57 PM
  #4  
The Rusty Gear's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 56
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton, Canada
Originally Posted by mike_d
no, it's not to burn fuel that didn't get used the second time around. the idea is that exhaust gasses don't burn (they're already burnt). so if you add some inert gasses to the cylinder and it dilutes the oxygen and causes everything to burn cooler. cooler combustion temps form fewer nox and hence less smog. however it's less efficient and lowers milage by about 10% or so. with blocked egr you'll not pass any smog tests in your area, so make sure you can easily put the egr back on for tests. i'm actually planning on bypassing my egr so that i can get a bit better milage.
Smog tests? Ha! In Alberta we don't even legally need a catalytic converter (so I was told at the muffler shop who cut my rusty old one out)

Last edited by The Rusty Gear; May 12, 2004 at 06:58 PM.
Reply
Old May 12, 2004 | 06:57 PM
  #5  
Epic Ed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 657
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
I just by-passed mine (literally - today). A buddy of mine did it to his and it runs great, but it's unlikely that I'll pass emmisions without putting it back on. Canada may be another matter.

Ed
Reply
Old May 13, 2004 | 07:20 AM
  #6  
mike_d's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Mountains outside of Boulder
Originally Posted by Epic Ed
I just by-passed mine (literally - today). A buddy of mine did it to his and it runs great, but it's unlikely that I'll pass emmisions without putting it back on. Canada may be another matter.
cool. was it easy to do? more importantly, will it be easy to put back on and not look like you messed with it. in co, we get a visual inspection before the real emissions test.
Reply
Old May 13, 2004 | 07:56 AM
  #7  
Highland Runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Highlands, NC
I believe the engine will knock pretty bad without the EGR, and cause bad things to happen to the pistons.
Reply
Old May 13, 2004 | 08:30 AM
  #8  
Epic Ed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 657
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Not the case for my buddy's ride. He has a '90 4Runner and has been running with that damn thing off for nearly a year -- no problems (that I'm aware of). Aside from the fact he's a 2nd Gen. 'Runner mod freak, he's also a mechanic and has been the guy who does the work on my ride. Coule he be wrong? Possibly. But I know the removal of the EGR is at least partially responsible for the improved gas mileage and increased throttle response.

I would be interested to hear from others who have done this mod, and to see if anyone can corroborate your concerns. Anyone? Is the ERG more than just a ploy by the environmentalists to given them a false sense of cleaner air and in the process deprive us of precious HP?

Ed

Last edited by Epic Ed; May 13, 2004 at 08:32 AM.
Reply
Old May 13, 2004 | 08:48 AM
  #9  
mike_d's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Mountains outside of Boulder
Originally Posted by Epic Ed
Is the ERG more than just a ploy by the environmentalists to given them a false sense of cleaner air and in the process deprive us of precious HP?
<off topic rant>
i'm glad you say this. i'm actually a pretty avid environmentalist (even though i drive an suv as my daily driver). the problem with most environmentalists is that they're not actually scientists/engineers. so to them "lowering the nox at the tailpipe" is a good thing, and the only thing they try to optimize. i've read a couple of reports, that if you factor in the lower gas milage, things like egr are not much help and in some cases hurt the over all pollution coming out of the car. (same with ethanol in gas.) i wish that the crazy environmentalists that are working on pushing legislation through would consult scientists and engineers so that we can actually improve the quality of the environment rather than just pretend we are.
</off topic rant>
Reply
Old May 13, 2004 | 08:59 AM
  #10  
The Rusty Gear's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 56
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton, Canada
Originally Posted by Epic Ed
Not the case for my buddy's ride. He has a '90 4Runner and has been running with that damn thing off for nearly a year -- no problems (that I'm aware of). Aside from the fact he's a 2nd Gen. 'Runner mod freak, he's also a mechanic and has been the guy who does the work on my ride. Coule he be wrong? Possibly. But I know the removal of the EGR is at least partially responsible for the improved gas mileage and increased throttle response.

I would be interested to hear from others who have done this mod, and to see if anyone can corroborate your concerns. Anyone? Is the ERG more than just a ploy by the environmentalists to given them a false sense of cleaner air and in the process deprive us of precious HP?

Ed
I remember reading somewhere that the EGR is not always "ON", that it does not recirculate the exhaust gas when the engine is under heavy load. If this is true, then there should be no issues with knocking because your truck is already operating with the valve "blocked" at times?????
Reply
Old May 13, 2004 | 09:49 AM
  #11  
Highland Runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Highlands, NC
I think its just the opposite. The valve is closed at idle/low vacuum. When the throttle is opened the vacuum pulls the valve open. This is why some cars run like crap at idle-because the valve gets stuck open.
Reply
Old May 13, 2004 | 10:12 AM
  #12  
mike_d's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Mountains outside of Boulder
Originally Posted by Highland Runner
I think its just the opposite. The valve is closed at idle/low vacuum. When the throttle is opened the vacuum pulls the valve open. This is why some cars run like crap at idle-because the valve gets stuck open.
isn't vacuum inversely proportional to the throttle position. i.e. at idle you're drawing the highest vacuum and at WOT you have negligable vacuum?
Reply
Old May 13, 2004 | 11:19 AM
  #13  
Highland Runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Highlands, NC
http://www.misterfixit.com/egrvalve.htm the second to last paragraph explains the vacuum thing.
Removal of the EGR vacuum line and capping is all thats needed to do this "mode". However I seem to remember a guy on TTORA that did this, and eventually destoyed his engine. The minimal power increase and mileage isn't worth it.

I think your right about the vacuum at idle etc. I took an EGR apart to fix off an old Nissan I had. There may have been a spring that held it closed at idle against the high vacuum. As the throttle moved and vacuum went down, the spring pushed the valve open.

Last edited by Highland Runner; May 13, 2004 at 11:29 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 01:19 PM
  #14  
p5150's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Spokompton, WA
I know this thread is old, but I think that there is some misinformation that needs to be cleared up.

EGR operates primarally at idle and low vacuum loads. At higher throttle, the EGR is not operational.

Removing EGR will not damage your engine.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Longbed 90
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
22
Mar 11, 2019 12:38 PM
wberry85
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
24
Apr 6, 2018 08:45 AM
bhaithc
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
7
Sep 17, 2015 07:53 PM
larrys93pickup
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
6
Sep 17, 2015 07:05 PM
Boomer8404
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
Sep 10, 2015 09:01 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:03 AM.