95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Anyone running FZJ80 Wheels on a 3rd gen?

Old Dec 11, 2003 | 07:54 PM
  #1  
Albuquerque Jim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Anyone running FZJ80 Wheels on a 3rd gen?

I was just wondering if anyone has tried the 16X8 OEM LC wheels on a 3rd gen.

They come with 4 1/2 backspacing which I think will work fine.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2003 | 04:56 PM
  #2  
FattyCBR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: Towson, MD
Hehe, I picked up one to try it out, the problem is I don't have a tire mounted on it right now so I can't tell you. I'm looking for a set of them so if you find some (or some more after you pick up a set) let me know. The only problem I can see with them is they use an acorn style lug nut, so you have to have 24 extra lug nuts. They're also 15 mm backspacing as opposed to the 22 mm on the stock 16 x 7" wheel. If you actually try them with a tire mounted please let me know.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2003 | 04:40 AM
  #3  
Victor's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,705
Likes: 0
From: El Paso, TX
A guy at work has them mounted on a 2nd gen 4Runner so yes it will work. They look factory on his truck. BTW he's running 265/75r16.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2003 | 06:17 AM
  #4  
My99's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 3
From: Fayetteville, AR
Is there any weight or width difference in the wheels. Just wondering if there was some sort of advantage to using them.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2003 | 06:46 AM
  #5  
RTdawgs's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
anyone got a pic?
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2003 | 07:08 AM
  #6  
Vato Loco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,644
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, ON
I know someone on the forum has them on their 3rd gen, but I just can't remember who it is.:pat:
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2003 | 07:20 AM
  #7  
Albuquerque Jim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Is there any weight or width difference in the wheels.
They are 16X8 the width is the difference.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2003 | 09:35 AM
  #8  
Mad Chemist's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,858
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Jim,

Double check, but I think thats the same backspacing on my Tech1 Rockcrawlers, which are also 16X8. Its a tight fit though, not a ton of clearance between the rim and caliper.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2003 | 09:52 AM
  #9  
My99's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 3
From: Fayetteville, AR
They are 16X8 the width is the difference.
Which begs the question, what do we (3rd gens) have? 7.5 or something?
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2003 | 09:53 AM
  #10  
Mad Chemist's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,858
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
16X7

Some guys go to 16X8 rims when they upgrade to 285/75/16 tires.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2003 | 10:05 AM
  #11  
My99's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 3
From: Fayetteville, AR
Wow, 16X7 is kinda skinny. Figured they'd be at least 16X8's. My little old car had 7.5" even. Oh well, guess I won't need to worry about it for at least another 30K miles anyway. Thanks for the info!
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 05:30 PM
  #12  
RTdawgs's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
ttt
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 05:41 PM
  #13  
snoozer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine, Texas
jacksilb has them. I've thought about switching to 80 series rims as well. A while back i asked "Tyler" on 4x4Wire about the specs on his rims. This is what I got:

95-97 Factory Wheels (Alloy wheels)
16" diameter
8" width
zero offset
4.5" backspacing
6 on 5.5" bolt pattern
lugs use flat washers instead of conical lug nuts ('95-'97)
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 08:17 PM
  #14  
BajaTaco's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
From: Prescott, AZ
Originally posted by snoozer
jacksilb has them. ..
Yep, here is Jack's 3rd gen with the TLC wheels...



I think they look awesome

Jack needs to get on here and post a more recent pic - he has DeMello sliders and new rear coils now.

Last edited by BajaTaco; Dec 14, 2003 at 08:18 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 09:48 PM
  #15  
RTdawgs's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
i love them
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 09:51 PM
  #16  
Albuquerque Jim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
I will be looking for a set of these.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 09:55 PM
  #17  
turboale's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,868
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
Those look pretty darn good!! I bet you could pick some up cheap on a LC forum...
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 02:27 AM
  #18  
Bighead's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally posted by turboale
Those look pretty darn good!! I bet you could pick some up cheap on a LC forum...
I don't think "cheap" and "Land Cruiser" belong in the same sentence.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 04:24 AM
  #19  
Vato Loco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,644
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, ON
Originally posted by Bighead
I don't think "cheap" and "Land Cruiser" belong in the same sentence.
It's so true!
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 11:01 AM
  #20  
jacksilb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Hello,

Sorry about the delay. Too much going on at work.
During my last trip I took some pictures for you. Just need to get home one of these days and format the pictures.

I love these wheels!

They work just great. It made my footprint wider.

BFGS ...
With AT 285 /75 / R16 they work good.
With MT 285/75/ R16 was no game
With MT 265/75 /R16 IT IS PERFECT.

I am considering going back to the 285 ATs. I don't like the MT on wet conditions.

-JACK

Last edited by jacksilb; Jan 9, 2004 at 11:02 AM.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:52 AM.