Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

265/70/R16 vs 265/75/R16 on 2000 4Runner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2018, 10:36 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
265/70/R16 vs 265/75/R16 on 2000 4Runner

Hi All,

I have a 2000 4Runner that I lifted a few years back and threw 33's on it. Overall, while awesome while wheeling, I felt like I lost a ton of power and speed going down the road (which I do 95% of the time). So I swapped back to stock 265/70/R16s. Now it is time to get some new tires and I was wondering about splitting the difference with 265/75/R16s. Do you think the extra inch would have a similar negative impact?

Another thought that I just had as I am typing this was that the 33's were mud MK2s and this time I am looking at a A/T Duratrac. Perhaps that had more impact to the power/speed than the size. Thoughts?

Thanks for any/all help!!
Chris
Old 10-10-2018, 12:14 PM
  #2  
Contributing Member
 
aowRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 35 Posts
Chris,
I'm on my 4th or 5th set of 265/75/16 tires - first Dueler ATs and then a few sets of Nitto Terra Grapplers. No issues with rubbing, etc. As for power loss, I've never really noticed a significant change, but I've also kept the transmission in ECT mode for 17+ years and I constantly click on & out of O/D as conditions warrant.

That reminds me, my current tires sound like they have flounders attached to them....





Andreas

Last edited by aowRS; 10-10-2018 at 12:21 PM.
Old 10-11-2018, 06:27 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Andreas! I mainly stay in ECT mode as well. I'm in Colorado, so I need it to get over Vail and Eisenhower at anything over 50mph!

I am leaning toward going with the 265/75R16s. One thing I noticed was this moves the tire into the E rating from the C rating of the 265/70R16s which may help with the sidewall issues I've heard about.

Thanks again!!
Old 10-11-2018, 08:04 AM
  #4  
Contributing Member
 
aowRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by cman
Thanks Andreas! I mainly stay in ECT mode as well. I'm in Colorado, so I need it to get over Vail and Eisenhower at anything over 50mph!

I am leaning toward going with the 265/75R16s. One thing I noticed was this moves the tire into the E rating from the C rating of the 265/70R16s which may help with the sidewall issues I've heard about.

Thanks again!!
My various sets of Nitto Terra Grapplers have been Load Range D.




Andreas
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vato Loco
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
12
01-09-2010 04:06 PM
hause64oz
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
6
06-15-2007 07:43 AM
Lance
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
03-26-2005 06:01 PM
Bundubasher
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
15
05-02-2003 08:27 AM
Bundubasher
Tires & Wheels
4
10-15-2002 09:36 AM



Quick Reply: 265/70/R16 vs 265/75/R16 on 2000 4Runner



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:42 PM.