Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

255/85/16 on a stock '99?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2007, 05:09 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
alexe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
255/85/16 on a stock '99?

yes i searched. i found that a guy has them on his stock '00 taco but i understand the wheel wells are different on the runner. anyone ever tried this size on a stock runner? its a '99 so im slightly taller. eventually i will lift it, probably ss#7 but my suspension is still good now and i cant afford the lift and locker. decided to go locker and 33" muds if i can fit them. thanks guys
Old 04-15-2007, 08:25 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
jeffoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a stock 01 4Runner and have a set of 255's I'm waiting to put in. I test fit on the front and there is a very minimal amount of rubbing on the wheel well (hits the bolt head that holds the sr5 flares on). I don't know just how much taller the 99 is, but I think you'd be very close to fitting without rub ...

Know it isn't much help ...
Old 04-15-2007, 08:27 AM
  #3  
Contributing Member
 
X-AWDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Littleton,CO
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why this size instead of 265/75s? 255 is going to look really skinny. 285/75 will need a bit of a lift.
Old 04-15-2007, 08:31 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
jeffoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.expeditionswest.com/resea...tion_rev1.html

Good reading on why tall and skinny. It comes down to personal choice, but for me tall and skinny is preferable. Out in the desert we don't see much deep mud or snow, so don't need flotation.
Old 04-15-2007, 08:33 AM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
alexe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by X-AWDriver
Why this size instead of 265/75s? 255 is going to look really skinny. 285/75 will need a bit of a lift.
i want to run a 33" with as little lift as possible. also im in canada and alot of my driving is in snow conditions. the skinny tire will work better for me. however i might just go 265/75/16 if i cant get the coopers where i am.
Old 04-15-2007, 09:55 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
HuskyRunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chilliwack, B.C.
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I put on some 255/85's on my unlifted '98, along with a 2" body lift. I still had to pound the pinch weld to clear during compression, but after that there are no fitment issues. If I remember right '99's sit 1" higher than '96-'98 and 2" higher than '00-on. So, stock if you 'wheel it you might have some clearance issues depending on how much you're willing to trim. Toss on a 1" body lift and you should eliminate 99% of the trimming.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
justdifferentials
Vendors Build-Ups (Build-Up Section)
14
06-11-2017 08:36 PM
4.34runner88
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
19
02-07-2016 02:24 AM
noahstancik
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
18
09-10-2015 10:47 AM
josh21
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
7
09-09-2015 03:26 PM
AkitaDog
Vehicles - Trailers (Complete)
0
09-03-2015 09:01 PM



Quick Reply: 255/85/16 on a stock '99?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:19 PM.