86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section) Post your build-ups here

aalba92691's 1988 Pickup Build-Up Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 08:02 PM
  #101  
93YotaMonster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Mocksville NC
sorry guys i had to do it, every one knows they love pink. how do you like the 1 1/2 spacers on the front?
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 08:05 PM
  #102  
peow130's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 16
From: Spokane, WA
Originally Posted by xxxtreme22r
holy cow 6 inches total. Hmm might look funny running 33 x 12.50s on factory front fenders. Even then with the 3 inch flared prerunner fenders from I think fiberworx????? they would be outside of the wells.

Whats the options on extending the rears to match?
Lol...
6" total..
Meaning 3" both side xD
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 08:17 PM
  #103  
YotaWoRx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: BFE
Originally Posted by 93YotaMonster
sorry guys i had to do it, every one knows they love pink. how do you like the 1 1/2 spacers on the front?
Seriously I really like them.. I traded a guy my old rims( they are in one of the photos of my truck where my lady is holding a coors light out of the window) for the stock aluminum sr5's.. the stock ones have less offset so my rig looked kind of funny with the glass fenders and wheels that were all sucked in. I added the spacers and It evened pushed them out just the right amount.. I've heard horror stories about wheels falling off and such that were equipped with spacers but Ive checked the spacer nuts a few times and they have never loosened up at all...
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 08:27 PM
  #104  
YotaWoRx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: BFE
More pix

In these pics the 1_1/2 spacers are up front as well as some 1.25's in the rear. if you look closely at the front hubs you'll see that they are countersunk because of the spacers.. Would you believe I bought this truck as you see it minus the rims for 1800 bucks a few years ago????!!!
Attached Thumbnails aalba92691's 1988 Pickup Build-Up Thread-mantruck-004.jpg   aalba92691's 1988 Pickup Build-Up Thread-mantruck-005.jpg   aalba92691's 1988 Pickup Build-Up Thread-mantruck-006.jpg  

Last edited by YotaWoRx; Nov 19, 2009 at 08:33 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 08:29 PM
  #105  
YotaWoRx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: BFE
rear pic

pic is taken with spacers on rear
Attached Thumbnails aalba92691's 1988 Pickup Build-Up Thread-mantruck-009.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 08:41 PM
  #106  
93YotaMonster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Mocksville NC
dam thats not a bad deal, looks good i cant wait to see the lift on
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 09:17 PM
  #107  
peow130's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 16
From: Spokane, WA
is that a taco bed on that o.0?
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 09:30 PM
  #108  
YotaWoRx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: BFE
Originally Posted by peow130
is that a taco bed on that o.0?
what do you mean? A Tacoma bed? whats a o.0.? The glass bedsides I believe are from an '89-'94 body style... don't know for sure.

Last edited by YotaWoRx; Nov 19, 2009 at 09:31 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 09:40 PM
  #109  
peow130's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 16
From: Spokane, WA
yeah a tacoma bed,

and that, sir, is a smiley.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 08:28 AM
  #110  
Robert m's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 143
From: Apple Valley, CA
the thing that scares me the most about this setup is the fact the it uses a completely stock UCA and the reason given for it is so you can find a replacement easily just incase you bend it! to me that sounds like its to be expected or it has happened in the past because that extension puts too much leverage on the UCA and the stamped steel cant take all that force.

Last edited by Robert m; Nov 20, 2009 at 08:38 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 01:14 PM
  #111  
Travisfab's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 344
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
I am curios as to how hard you are going to run your truck?
My truck has a stock lower that has been extended, and home built uppers. Both control arms pivot on stock ball joints. The leverage that is going to be put on the stock upper from that extension piece worries me. I am not too familiar with stock 4x4 lowers, but the way that thing ties into spindle does not inspire confidence. If you are just going to cruise along, I'm sure you'll be fine, but if you get caught going too fast in some deep whoops, make sure you have a tow strap.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 03:59 PM
  #112  
crazytoyota4x4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 381
Likes: 2
From: Montrose, Colorado
I am planning on building my own Lt kit using 2x 1/4" wall steel square tubing. When I do I will definitly post pics. Probably makin it 2 wheel drive with a locker.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 04:15 PM
  #113  
peow130's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 16
From: Spokane, WA
Originally Posted by Robert m
the thing that scares me the most about this setup is the fact the it uses a completely stock UCA and the reason given for it is so you can find a replacement easily just incase you bend it! to me that sounds like its to be expected or it has happened in the past because that extension puts too much leverage on the UCA and the stamped steel cant take all that force.
The guy ran the baja 250 with this setup, and several other races.
I think it's going to be fine.
And if the stock UCA's couldnt handle the extension, then they shouldnt be able to handle having no extension.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 04:17 PM
  #114  
iamsuperbleeder's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,248
Likes: 33
From: Lake City, Fl
if all else fails, fill the freek'n UCA with molten steel, and then it'll be SOLID
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 04:21 PM
  #115  
peow130's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 16
From: Spokane, WA
Originally Posted by iamsuperbleeder
if all else fails, fill the freek'n UCA with molten steel, and then it'll be SOLID
o.0
thats a little bit overkill lol.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 04:29 PM
  #116  
iamsuperbleeder's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,248
Likes: 33
From: Lake City, Fl
Originally Posted by peow130
o.0
thats a little bit overkill lol.
yeah, and the ball-joint mouting flange on the UCA will probably still be the weak-link, lol
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 04:49 PM
  #117  
Robert m's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 143
From: Apple Valley, CA
Originally Posted by peow130
The guy ran the baja 250 with this setup, and several other races.
I think it's going to be fine.
And if the stock UCA's couldnt handle the extension, then they shouldnt be able to handle having no extension.
you could do the baja 1000 in stock form if you wanted, but if you dont go fast then you probably wont brake anything. my point is, if the UCA were at least boxed in and the balljoint surface supported then i could see them taking some decent amount of abuse but these being stamped steel i dont see them lasting.
now if im wrong, then more power to this guy for making a entry level kit cheaper then the other guys but if im right, then i hope that the person finds the weakened UCA while sitting in the driveway and not while driving.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 05:03 PM
  #118  
Booosted Supra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 429
Likes: 1
From: Audubon NJ
hows the progress coming along?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 05:52 PM
  #119  
iamsuperbleeder's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,248
Likes: 33
From: Lake City, Fl
Originally Posted by Booosted Supra
hows the progress coming along?
lmao, you see it...

5 pages long, and not even a wrench turned yet
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 05:54 PM
  #120  
BlazeN8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 977
Likes: 4
From: Southern California
Robert,
Chill out on your critique on Alberts thread. Let Albert try the Blazeland kit out and do his own write up, thats what we are all here for! I am trying to stay out of Alberts build thread but your not giving things a chance. Let Albert evaluate things, he is the one with the kit you are just looking at his pictures.
I understand your concerns with strength of the stock UCA and the UCA Extension Bracket. I was too in the begining! I built the UCA bracket for geometry to mock up some 1-1/2" cromoly tubular arms. I drove on it a bit and then refined it on Autocad. I improved it a number of times. I did testing on multiple rigs over the past 3-4 years. I have the kit on my 4 Runner and the Fordota. The Fordota had a cast iron block V-8 motor and the motor has cast iron heads. It has a super heavy front bumper. It is hundreds of pounds heavyer than stock rigs. I drive the Fordota hard and jump it as well as hit high speeds on the freeway to and from the desert.
There are a dozen customers with the Blazeland setup, Albert is just the first guy from yotatech to have the balls take the leap of faith. I pre-run in the desert and wheel on trails; as do my customers, my brother, and my friends! Its been holding up for everyone. Everyone is satisfied and and many are amazed! No one has ever had a failure to any of the Blazeland componants. So again I ask you please chill out. It looks poorly on your character to feel the need to cut down others to build yourself up. Don't be a "hater"

Nate

Originally Posted by Robert m
you could do the baja 1000 in stock form if you wanted, but if you dont go fast then you probably wont brake anything. my point is, if the UCA were at least boxed in and the balljoint surface supported then i could see them taking some decent amount of abuse but these being stamped steel i dont see them lasting.
now if im wrong, then more power to this guy for making a entry level kit cheaper then the other guys but if im right, then i hope that the person finds the weakened UCA while sitting in the driveway and not while driving.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:51 PM.