Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Throttle Body Spacer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 09:12 AM
  #1  
wcc_71's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Throttle Body Spacer

i have 92 with a 3.0 in it and i was wondering if anyone could help me find where i can order a throttle body spacer for it. i looked and cant find one anywhere
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 11:13 AM
  #2  
stormin94's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 4
From: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
They don't make them anyway. I've heard they are good for a little more MPG tho.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 11:20 AM
  #3  
86blue4runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Wye, AR
Originally Posted by Buhundred
Throotle body spacers wont work. Its just a waste of money
they do work! i know someone where i live that got for his truck. the problem is that no one mass produces them. i know that here there's a shop that if you take your truck to them they will make you one for only the cost of materials. just check around your area for maybe a metal shop that could custom fab one.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 12:03 PM
  #4  
Matt16's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
I am forgetting the theory behind the TB spacer. Someone please refresh my memory.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 12:13 PM
  #5  
scuba's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 11,338
Likes: 120
From: Austin, Texas
im with matt
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 12:15 PM
  #6  
a4runnerfreak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,592
Likes: 0
From: Grew up in S.C.V, So Cal.....now in Hampstead, NC
, no that's something even I never heard of....
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #7  
Jay351's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 10
From: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
TB spacers allow for better fuel/air atomization (I didnt spell that right). The theory is the more space will allow the air and fuel to mix longer and thus burning better.

They do NOT do ANYTHING on a fuel injected engine. The fuel is injected directly into the combustion chamber, not before the intake. These spacers will only improve power (not much btw) on carb'd engines with low rise intake manifolds.

Don't waste your money people.....
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 01:37 PM
  #8  
stormin94's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 4
From: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
I've noticed a gain on my dad's 350 TBI chevy. But that's more like an electric carburetor than a true EFI system.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 01:38 PM
  #9  
Jay351's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 10
From: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
Yeah, its kinda inbetween. I could (in theory) see a possibly gain on the chevy TBI system, since its still based (loosley) on a carb platform.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 01:43 PM
  #10  
stormin94's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 4
From: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
Originally Posted by Jay351
Yeah, its kinda inbetween. I could (in theory) see a possibly gain on the chevy TBI system, since its still based (loosley) on a carb platform.
But it is definitely no where near the 10-15% advertised gains. Went a little further on a tank, too. Like 50-60 miles more than before. which is only like 1 MPG on a 42 gallon tank. Needless to say, the throttle body spacer is pretty much useless these days, since we very rarely drive the Suburban that it is attached to anymore.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 01:43 PM
  #11  
abecedarian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 6
From: Temecula Valley, CA
on a port-injected system, the theory is the added distance between the throttle plate and the plenum allows some extra time for the turbulence from the throttle plate to be reduced and adds some volume to the plenum, which depending on the acoustical characteristics of the plenum, could also increase velocity down the intake passages to the valves.

Last edited by abecedarian; Jul 28, 2008 at 01:45 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 01:45 PM
  #12  
stormin94's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 4
From: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
Originally Posted by abecedarian
on a port-injected system, the theory is the added distance between the throttle plate and the plenum allows some extra time for the turbulence from the throttle plate to be reduced and adds some volume to the plenum, which depending on the acoustical characteristics of the engine, could also increase velocity down the intake passages to the valves.
That's an excellent theory, but the real question is: does it work like the manufacturers claim? or even at all in real life?

On a second thought, isn't that the exact opposite reason that people polish their intake manifolds? To prevent turbulence, and allow a swifter, less restricted airflow into the combustion chamber.

Last edited by stormin94; Jul 28, 2008 at 01:48 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 01:49 PM
  #13  
abecedarian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 6
From: Temecula Valley, CA
I've often wondered why engine makers don't use exhaust system techniques to increase efficiency in the intake- like a header in reverse.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 01:55 PM
  #14  
stormin94's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 4
From: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
Originally Posted by abecedarian
I've often wondered why engine makers don't use exhaust system techniques to increase efficiency in the intake- like a header in reverse.
Edelbrock makes intake manifolds with the same principles as headers, but mostly for carb'd engines. Why they don't make the engines like that from the factory is still a mystery to me.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 03:11 PM
  #15  
Jay351's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 10
From: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
I recently watched a show where they did some dyno testing on a freshly built pushrod v8. They tried the two different kinds of spacers to no avail, their reasoning... the use of a hi-rise intake manifold that accomplishes the exact same thing.

In anycase I would never waste my money on it, for the gains you MIGHT get, its not worth the price...
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 05:36 PM
  #16  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
I know they can't work on direct injection motors which I know the 3.4s are but I'm not sure about the 3.0s tho'.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 07:45 PM
  #17  
Matt16's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by abecedarian
I've often wondered why engine makers don't use exhaust system techniques to increase efficiency in the intake- like a header in reverse.
Because there is alot larger a volume of gases leaving the engine that coming in.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Blamalam
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
22
Mar 12, 2022 07:34 AM
jetpilot
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
6
Aug 15, 2015 06:48 AM
mtc1105
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
0
Aug 4, 2015 08:06 PM
bighaydn
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
0
Aug 4, 2015 07:17 PM
greenbuggy
3.4 Swaps
4
Jul 23, 2015 11:51 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:30 PM.