Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Rough ride 89 runner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 13, 2012 | 02:46 AM
  #1  
foppert's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 117
Likes: 2
Rough ride 89 runner

I have a stock 89 runner and the ride is unbearable, it bashes over bumps that barely jar my cousins 98 accord. The ride doesnt feel bouncy, it just feels like i crash over everything. I'm not a major offroader, i just want stock ride height and a better ride... the last thing i need is the ride to be any harder.

It currently has very rusty old rancho shocks, which i intend to replace with bilstiens as recomended by the nice gents on this site. The tires are general grabbers, 31x10.5 on stock rims... but they are over 10 years old (plenty of tread left, oddly enough) but they cant be helping my ride out.

From what i can see it appears that my suspension has sagged quite a bit. I'm looking at zuk modding my rear springs, I just hope that that wont make the ride harder...

My question is for the front, im looking at adjusting my torsion bars just to achieve stock ride height. Any recomendations on how high it should be for the front?


Also any other suggestions to improve the ride are welcome, these are just what i found from searching here.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2012 | 06:37 AM
  #2  
yojohn3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: New York
Definately adding some type of helper springs would help out with your sagging in the rear.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2012 | 06:50 AM
  #3  
rattlewagon's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,832
Likes: 332
From: Northfield, Vermont
Souds like your stock springs are BEAT. Helper spring and the zukmod are just a band-aids.

Id look into replacing the springs completely. Lots of people have had good success with OldManEmu.

With the front. Measure from the top of the rim (assuming you have 15" rims) to the bottom of the fender. I think stock is 12-13 inches? Someone should correct me on that one.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2012 | 08:28 AM
  #4  
MudHippy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 27
Originally Posted by foppert
I have a stock 89 runner and the ride is unbearable, it bashes over bumps that barely jar my cousins 98 accord. The ride doesnt feel bouncy, it just feels like i crash over everything. I'm not a major offroader, i just want stock ride height and a better ride... the last thing i need is the ride to be any harder.

My question is for the front, im looking at adjusting my torsion bars just to achieve stock ride height. Any recomendations on how high it should be for the front?
It's a 1/2 ton 4WD truck chassis, so don't expect much. It ain't ever gonna ride like a 98 Accord.

You measure the front ride height/chassis ground clearance from the center of the bolts holding the lower control arms on(see pic below). Download the 88 FSM here http://ncttora.com/fsm/87-4Runner/to...4runner_88.pdf , then use your model code to figure out the stock ride height/chassis ground clearances for it. The pages are actually A-32 & A-33(pages 1390 & 1391 of the .pdf), that's a misprint.


Last edited by MudHippy; Jan 13, 2012 at 08:32 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2012 | 10:21 AM
  #5  
foppert's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 117
Likes: 2
Maybe the accord was a bit much to hope for, but i know my friends t-100 4x4 rides infinitely smoother.

I measured the ground clearence, and it was right in the range where it should be, within 3-4mm +or - and i measured on a slight slope.I cant get an exact measurement out of the fsm because my truck is an 89, my fsm along with the one you linked is for an 88 my trucks model number doesnt show up. The measurements in the were meant for 225/75 r15 tires.

BUT

I searched for the diameter of a tire this size on tire rack got that it should be 28.3 inches, my tires i measured close to 29 inches, they should be 30.5 inches

If my math and unit converters are right this makes my tires radius (using the 29 inches i measured) close to 9 mm higher off the ground, not to meantion my surface was on a tilt and not exactly lab grade level.

So by rough estimate this means my suspension may have sagged at most 5mm, doesnt sound like alot to me. What do you guys think?

The rear definiatly looks sagged, but i guess thats the fender wells messing with me. Looks like its time to just replace the shocks and see what happens.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2012 | 11:02 AM
  #6  
foppert's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 117
Likes: 2
Well i just read that the stock rolling diameter of 225/75 tires is 27.5 inches, and that starts to change things, that makes estimated 15mm sag. Can anyone conferm or deny,

My numbers were close to 432mm in the rear and close to 280mm in the front
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 10:35 PM
  #7  
foppert's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 117
Likes: 2
Replaced the shocks all the way around, front rides much better, the rear is still pretty hard.

I'm still looking at the zukmod, would it be nescessary to raise the front aswell?
I have never like lifts due to the extra strain on other parts like driveline and tire wear issues, would zukmod suffer from these?
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 10:50 PM
  #8  
cman1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 856
Likes: 1
From: greenville,wi
to bring it back to stock hight in the rear,a 100lb 12inch spring should get you there,maybe an inch higher,as far as the front..you can play with cranking the TBs a little at a time and see if you like it.if ya dont ...undo em!! also,check this out for info,my 89 runner is in there before and after,http://api.viglink.com/api/click?for...13273916111501

Last edited by cman1; Jan 23, 2012 at 11:02 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 11:22 PM
  #9  
wyoming9's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,381
Likes: 100
From: I live in New Tripoli Pa out in the woods
Red face

it is not designed to ride like a car.

Throw a half a ton in the back it will ride much better if your looking for a smooth ride.

A longer wheel base will ride better.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2012 | 07:33 PM
  #10  
cman1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 856
Likes: 1
From: greenville,wi
Originally Posted by wyoming9
it is not designed to ride like a car.

Throw a half a ton in the back it will ride much better if your looking for a smooth ride.

A longer wheel base will ride better.
when your leafs are bad ,it bottoms out on a curb...very hard.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MMA_Alex
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
25
Apr 18, 2017 05:07 AM
toyota32
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
6
Jul 6, 2015 05:42 PM
Jnkml
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
Jul 6, 2015 01:20 PM
Steezy96yota
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
1
Jul 6, 2015 10:00 AM
HRDC0R19
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
Jul 5, 2015 06:43 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:32 PM.