Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

the limits of your truck

Old Mar 11, 2008 | 02:01 PM
  #101  
alpine4x4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 64
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by bigtrucknwheels
haha, I've been doing my reading on this site. And I completely agree with you. That should take me anywhere I'll be interested in going, and won't chew through tires/gears/CV's, anything like that.
Well IFS has its limits. I fried gears with an open front It all depends on how hard you are on the rig. Baby it and dont force it and your IFS should be fine...ish.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 02:46 PM
  #102  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
Originally Posted by alpine4x4
Yep and upgrading the front to a locker is asking to grenade parts. Sticking with smaller tires greatly decreases the chances, but big meats have their place and when it comes time, 33" tires sometimes just wont cut it.
BS.

Since you don't have a front locker, how would you know?
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 02:57 PM
  #103  
alpine4x4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 64
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by tc
BS.

Since you don't have a front locker, how would you know?
Friends with lockers

You know how a locker works. In a situation where one tire is bound up on a rock, say wedged in, and the other isnt with an open diff the non wedged tire would most likely spin due to less resistance. With the locker both spin and you increase the chance of breaking a shaft becase the bound tire is trying to move. Happens with any rig. Im not saying it happens IFS only, it happens with all front ends.

And with less weight theres less strain on the front end decreasing parts breakage. smaller tire=less carnage.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 08:38 PM
  #104  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
That is ONE scenario, and a TOTALLY avoidable one at that, where, yes, lockers MAY increase the chance of damage.

Lockers PREVENT front end damage in many more scenarios, unavoidable scenarios, by limiting the shock load on the drivetrain.

With an open diff, when a wheel comes off the ground, it spins at 2x the speed of the ring gear. When it comes back down, it suddenly slows down to the speed of the ring gear, transmitting HUGE shock loads to the CV's, and worse yet, the diff. There is no way to control this - you have to be on the gas for the truck to move!

With a locker, the wheels never spin under power in excess of the ring gear, therefore, there is no shock load and the front end is preserved.

I can tell you that my front locker has not increased the damage to the CV's and diff, despite a heavy rig with dual cases.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 05:08 AM
  #105  
AxleIke's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 6
From: Arvada, Colorado
Lockers prevent CV damage hands down.

I've been in the above "one tire bound, the other free" scenario countless times with zero breakage.

Its simply in how you drive. Breaks occur when mistakes are made.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 08:17 AM
  #106  
alpine4x4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 64
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by AxleIke
Lockers prevent CV damage hands down.

I've been in the above "one tire bound, the other free" scenario countless times with zero breakage.

Its simply in how you drive. Breaks occur when mistakes are made.
Or when you push it to its limits

TC i actually fried a ring gear in a similar situation. I put the front tire up in the air quite ways, i began to slide down so i hit my brakes but the damage was already done. It destroyed my spider gears spinning at a high speed.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 11:02 AM
  #107  
AxleIke's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 6
From: Arvada, Colorado
I think the point about the lockers is that with 2, plus gearing, you can hit the limits without breaking stuff.

At the end of the day, if you're driving the trails that you want to be without breaking, its serving its purpose.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 12:25 PM
  #108  
alpine4x4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 64
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by AxleIke
I think the point about the lockers is that with 2, plus gearing, you can hit the limits without breaking stuff.

At the end of the day, if you're driving the trails that you want to be without breaking, its serving its purpose.
I think the limits would be with lockers, gearing, etc. and then breaking. Im sure you guys could easily push your rigs farther than you do, but due to risk of breakage you dont. And like you said its serving its purpose for you guys.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 02:39 PM
  #109  
AxleIke's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 6
From: Arvada, Colorado
We could go around and around with this, as we have in other threads. Your neck of the woods (PNW, I believe) is FAR different than out here.

For you, you have to spin and gas it to get up stuff. You break parts, and that holds you back.

For us, 2 lockers and gearing gets us up whatever we want. You are correct that we hold back from breaking things, but those things are not axles and diffs, those things are doors, glass, 1/4 panels etc...

I stop on a trail when I feel Body damage is inevitable. Breaking mechanical parts does not bother me in the least. I can change them in short order, and I go out pretty well prepared.

Anyway, there are trails that require a SAS. Your low traction stuff falls in that category for the strength issue alone. Out here, there are only a VERY few trails that require a SAS, and most of those require body damage.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 03:03 PM
  #110  
alpine4x4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 64
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by AxleIke
We could go around and around with this, as we have in other threads. Your neck of the woods (PNW, I believe) is FAR different than out here.

For you, you have to spin and gas it to get up stuff. You break parts, and that holds you back.

For us, 2 lockers and gearing gets us up whatever we want. You are correct that we hold back from breaking things, but those things are not axles and diffs, those things are doors, glass, 1/4 panels etc...

I stop on a trail when I feel Body damage is inevitable. Breaking mechanical parts does not bother me in the least. I can change them in short order, and I go out pretty well prepared.

Anyway, there are trails that require a SAS. Your low traction stuff falls in that category for the strength issue alone. Out here, there are only a VERY few trails that require a SAS, and most of those require body damage.
Agreed its all a matter of terrain.

You guys have some crazy traction down there. We have very little terrain like yours, i wish we had more. We do have a place called the funny/moonrocks but its under like 6ft of snow right now
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 03:10 PM
  #111  
keithguts's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Bay Shore, NY
Toyota's Don't Have Limits !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 03:11 PM
  #112  
Luvmeye22re's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 720
Likes: 1
From: Ski town Colorado
Originally Posted by GenXr
My truck is limited by my wife. She won't let me spend money on it.
That's why you need to tell her the truck is your one and only and she is the side fling

My truck definitely has a few limits, most of which I can blame on my wallet and my job lol.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 04:50 PM
  #113  
idanity's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 598
Likes: 3
From: seattle WA
mine doesn't float but did drive out of a swamp filled w/silt (worse than mud) and bald tires (crazy tough).

the only better 4wd i ever owned was a 61 scout. (and its top speed was 50mph, but could do a "donut" on top of competition hill)(sand rails couldn't even do that).

my 86 has been totaled and rebuilt (the only original part is the floorboard and firewall. ) drives over 75 on any freeway (4cylinder).

its a great truck

the 88 (3.0) lost its headgasket, *pending new engine or rebuild HG*
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
arlindsay1992
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
7
Jan 23, 2024 01:34 PM
wberry85
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
11
Jul 6, 2015 03:24 AM
MadMax48
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
8
Jul 3, 2015 08:26 AM
C2damuthafuqinLO
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
1
Jul 23, 2002 12:09 PM
be_deviler
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
2
Jul 1, 2002 05:27 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:13 AM.