Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Kinda Odd Looking?

Old Dec 13, 2007 | 02:50 PM
  #21  
zbrockredneck1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: GA
Without those ugly wheels and tires it would probably look ok!
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 02:50 PM
  #22  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
I'm guessing something near a 33x12.50, but huge backspacing on the rims
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 02:51 PM
  #23  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
are there any pix of the rear suspension?
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 03:02 PM
  #24  
bigtrucknwheels's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,336
Likes: 2
From: Harrisburg, PA
whats the point in modding it only to make it a 2wd? am I missing something here?
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 03:06 PM
  #25  
drock2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, MI
Originally Posted by tc
are there any pix of the rear suspension?


Wouldn't changing it to 4wd take most of travel out of the long travel suspension? I always figured if you wanted alot of travel out of the ifs, you'd want to go with a 2wd.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 03:09 PM
  #26  
rowdy235's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,803
Likes: 1
From: Sweet Home, OR
Yea something is kind of odd. Around 15 minutes from my front door. Thats where my uncle bought his truck.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 03:45 PM
  #27  
premirrider's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Jay351
Tires are WAY to big, looks dis-perportion
Hahah thats because you have 5 inches of lift and 33's. JK

Personally I think thats Bad A$$. It would be fun for sure.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2007 | 08:22 AM
  #28  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
It is easier to get more travel out of a 2WD system because obviously you don't have to worry about the axles binding up. The solution for 4WD is to go REALLY wide and that causes it's own problems.

http://www.chaosfab.com/95301.html
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2007 | 08:35 AM
  #29  
Belize Off Road Team's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,850
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton, Alberta
whats so odd looking about it? the only thing out of place on the looks are the Downey fenders! other than that, i wonder what the ride is like on it!
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2007 | 11:18 AM
  #30  
bigtrucknwheels's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,336
Likes: 2
From: Harrisburg, PA
Originally Posted by tc
It is easier to get more travel out of a 2WD system because obviously you don't have to worry about the axles binding up. The solution for 4WD is to go REALLY wide and that causes it's own problems.

http://www.chaosfab.com/95301.html
But what good is travel if you can't pull yourself over the obstacle to begin with?
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2007 | 12:01 PM
  #31  
drock2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, MI
Well I'd guess this 4Runner was built as a baja truck. Something for driving fast on desert roads, 4wd really wouldn't be necessary.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2007 | 02:12 PM
  #32  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
Originally Posted by bigtrucknwheels
But what good is travel if you can't pull yourself over the obstacle to begin with?
Because you're going so fast that momentum carries you over ... and the suspension moves enough to let that happen.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2007 | 02:17 PM
  #33  
EWAYota's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,586
Likes: 1
From: Richland, Washington
Originally Posted by bigtrucknwheels
But what good is travel if you can't pull yourself over the obstacle to begin with?
You need to take a look at BruceTS's 4Runner.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2007 | 05:45 PM
  #34  
drock2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, MI
Sold for $2650, that's a pretty good deal.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2007 | 11:09 AM
  #35  
CASTAIC 4RUNNER's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Castaic, California
im not really into the 2nd gens but thats AWESOME
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2007 | 04:18 PM
  #36  
SKNKWRX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 296
Likes: 5
From: Chicago, IL
just the long travel kit runs close to $2000 from either TC or Downey. Not a bad find for somebody. Maybe it will pop up on here.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aowRS
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
5
Sep 13, 2017 08:22 AM
Marley2984
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
2
Dec 6, 2015 05:19 AM
Davebarbier
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
32
Nov 3, 2015 03:28 PM
mreagen
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
10
Oct 5, 2015 04:27 PM
90YotaPU
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
5
Sep 21, 2015 11:59 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:33 AM.