Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

IFS travel

Old Apr 4, 2006 | 09:19 PM
  #1  
mat's Avatar
mat
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 1
IFS travel

Hi,
1st time posting, but had a ? i cant find an A to. I have a stock 1993 pickup (4x4 toy naturally) and was wondering what the STOCK travel is (full top to bottem) on the IFS.

Also, planning on geting 1 1/2 Balljoint Spacers and was wondering if you can run low profile COMPRESION bump stops. I know you can't run low pro droop stops.

Any help is apritiated. -Thanx
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 09:22 PM
  #2  
bob200587's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,546
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
never measured it, but it's not that great....I hear that if you get the BJ spacers and then lower the torsion bars down a bit it helps increase travel.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 11:56 PM
  #3  
deathrunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,969
Likes: 1
From: San Diego CA
I believe stock travel is something like 7"-7.5" There should be no problem running smaller compression stops. They will defintiely increase flex. As the arms compress the CV angle actually gets "better", so that will not be a problem.

One thing to consider,though. Depending on what kind of wheeling you do, you may not want lo profile bumpstops. The factory ones are a lot more absorbant and cushy than the poly lo pro stops. For fast riding, the lo pros can be a bit rougher when bottomed out, and this can lead to bending up the bump stop mounts if you really hammer your stuff. (I've seen it lots here in Cali). If you're doing crawly trails, then no problems, just be aware of this.

Also disconnecting the sway bar will increase flex as well. DO NOT RUN LARGER TORSION BARS.... they kill flex. and try not to crank the t bars, if you leave them stock or lower sthem slightly, it will not give you more flex, but it will make what you have more usable.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 08:29 AM
  #4  
mat's Avatar
mat
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 1
I thought stock was around 7 1/2, but wasn't shure and don't worry i'm not touching the t-bars.
But now I'm wondering: How much travel would be gainned by low pro bumps if the stock bumps themselves compress more any way? and could i just "shave" the stockers and have absorbant low pros?
Just trying to see the pros and cons.
Thanx
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 09:09 AM
  #5  
deathrunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,969
Likes: 1
From: San Diego CA
Part of what makes the stock bumps absorbant is the material, yes, but also the height. because of the height there is also more "time" for them to absorb. It would be pretty similar if you shaved them down alot. I am guessing that you could get an extra 1/2"-1" of travel. If you get a 1/2" lower bump, the arm can move that much more....but at the wheel that should be magnified a bit.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kawazx636
The Classifieds GraveYard
34
Oct 6, 2021 03:03 PM
TheBFA
Solid Axle Swaps, All Years
8
Feb 15, 2020 06:55 AM
83yotastockR
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
11
Nov 10, 2015 06:54 AM
dirk89
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
2
Oct 1, 2015 05:15 PM
toyotasaurus
Vehicles - Trailers (Complete)
0
Sep 24, 2015 03:30 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:12 AM.