Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Identify this 3vze connector...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2015 | 01:43 PM
  #1  
mtrdrms's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: CT
Identify this 3vze connector...



This is a 93 and it's getting codes 25 and 52. Just found this unplugged connector. Could this be why?
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2015 | 01:53 PM
  #2  
rustypigeon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 617
Likes: 4
From: PA USA
What color are the wires going to it?
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2015 | 01:59 PM
  #3  
mtrdrms's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: CT
Black and brown.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2015 | 02:22 PM
  #4  
RJR's Avatar
RJR
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 110
From: Northern Colorado
Sounds like the knock sensor to me. That would explain the code 52 (no signal from knock sensor), anyway. Don't know if that could confuse the ECU enough to also cause the code 25 (too lean condition).
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2015 | 02:27 PM
  #5  
rustypigeon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 617
Likes: 4
From: PA USA
Originally Posted by RJR
Sounds like the knock sensor to me.
The knock sensor has a single black wire attached to the connector.

I looked at the wiring diagram and I can't find anything that has those color wires going to it.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2015 | 02:45 PM
  #6  
RJR's Avatar
RJR
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 110
From: Northern Colorado
My wiring diagram shows a black wire going to the knock sensor itself, and a brown wire connected to the associated shield.Identify this 3vze connector...-ecuwiring.jpg

(Hopefully this diagram attached)
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2015 | 02:54 PM
  #7  
mtrdrms's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: CT
Curious. Here is another one.



Alternatively, IIRC the knock sensor wire sneaks up through a small groove between the head and manifold. Nowhere to be found on this truck but the rubber insulator is still there:

Reply
Old Jul 1, 2015 | 04:02 PM
  #8  
rustypigeon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 617
Likes: 4
From: PA USA
Originally Posted by RJR
My wiring diagram shows a black wire going to the knock sensor itself, and a brown wire connected to the associated shield.Attachment 102490

(Hopefully this diagram attached)
The brown wire is attached to the shield with a splice, not a connector. That octagon with the "E27" shows you that it is a splice located in the engine compartment. Further down you will see an octagon with a "I15" in it. This splice is located in the Interior.

When a wire is attached to a connector, it will have a small number signifying what pin on the connector the wire is located on. Pin #1 in this case.

I just looked at my spare '94 22re harness and it indeed had a single black wire going to the knock sensor connector.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2015 | 04:38 PM
  #9  
mtrdrms's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: CT
So are you saying this isn't the connector for the knock sensor?
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2015 | 04:42 PM
  #10  
RJR's Avatar
RJR
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 110
From: Northern Colorado
Originally Posted by rustypigeon
The brown wire is attached to the shield with a splice, not a connector. That octagon with the "E27" shows you that it is a splice located in the engine compartment. Further down you will see an octagon with a "I15" in it. This splice is located in the Interior.

When a wire is attached to a connector, it will have a small number signifying what pin on the connector the wire is located on. Pin #1 in this case.

I just looked at my spare '94 22re harness and it indeed had a single black wire going to the knock sensor connector.
You obviously have more experience reading these diagrams than I do. Thanks for explaining the rationale behind some of the labeling and numbering.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2015 | 04:51 PM
  #11  
rustypigeon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 617
Likes: 4
From: PA USA
Originally Posted by mtrdrms
So are you saying this isn't the connector for the knock sensor?
Actually, it almost is. (Thanks to RJR, who got my eyes looking where they needed to be) That is a connector, that connects to another wire, that then connects to the knock sensor. If you look at the diagram that RJR posted, you will see two rectangles that have "ED1" in them. (rectangles signify wire to wire connectors) That is the connector you are looking at. There is then another wire that attaches to the "ED1" connector and then goes to the knock sensor. The splice is located in this intermediate wire.

The intermediate wire that needs to hook your connector to the knock sensor looks like this...



My 22re does not have this intermediate wire. That is what threw me off.

Last edited by rustypigeon; Jul 1, 2015 at 05:32 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2015 | 05:19 PM
  #12  
mtrdrms's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: CT
Well thank you guys. Looks like the manifolds are coming off. Or can this little sensor be bypassed? The truck runs like poo so I've gotta Do something. Do you think the code 25 might originate from this as well?

Last edited by mtrdrms; Jul 1, 2015 at 05:20 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2015 | 07:56 PM
  #13  
RJR's Avatar
RJR
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 110
From: Northern Colorado
No, you really have to fix this. The engine runs most efficiently when the timing is advanced as far as possible. However, advancing it too far will result in knocking and subsequent engine damage (holes in pistons, stuff like that.) The knock sensor tells the ECU how far it can go without damage occurring. If the signal from the knock sensor is missing, the ECU is "flying blind" , so it throws code 52 and retards the timing a lot to stay well away from the knock zone to avoid catastrophic damage. This results in an engine with poor power and fuel economy, as you are experiencing.

Before electronic controls, engine timing advance was handled by centrifugal and vacuum advance mechanisms in the distributor. These mechanisms essentially don't exist in the Toyota distributor, so there is no way to get the engine to run well in the absence of a working knock sensor.

I don't know if the code 25 could be a collateral result of your disconnected knock sensor. I would fix the KS first, reset the codes (pull the EFI fuse for 30 seconds) and see what happens.

Last edited by RJR; Jul 1, 2015 at 07:57 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2015 | 08:01 PM
  #14  
scope103's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,380
Likes: 871
From: San Francisco East Bay
Originally Posted by mtrdrms
... Looks like the manifolds are coming off. Or can this little sensor be bypassed? The truck runs like poo so I've gotta Do something. Do you think the code 25 might originate from this as well?
The intake manifold has to come off to access the knock sensor. (The wire between ED1 and the knock sensor is often called the "pigtail.") The knock sensor can't be bypassed. Occasionally, someone suggests mounting a knock sensor to the engine lifting hook to overcome the code. I really don't believe this could possibly work, but if someone claims that it worked for them, I can't dispute the claim.

The truck runs like poo because code 52 dramatically retards the timing (to save the engine). Yeah, you gotta fix it.

It's hard for me to imagine the connection to code 25, but with the timing off that far lots of things could happen.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2015 | 02:50 AM
  #15  
mtrdrms's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: CT
Thank you for the insightful replies. Very good information. This truck needs head gaskets too so I'll sort that out when I'm down to the bare block. Thanks again.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2015 | 12:22 PM
  #16  
mtrdrms's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: CT
Any chance a prolonged code 52 would cause overheating?
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2015 | 03:13 PM
  #17  
fdp101452's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 282
Likes: 27
From: Woodward, Oklahoma
I fought code 52 for quite a while and never had overheating problems. I don't see how it would cause that kind of problem.......
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2015 | 05:06 PM
  #18  
mtrdrms's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: CT
Yeah, I figured. Just don't want to pull the heads yet.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2015 | 07:21 AM
  #19  
Team420's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,049
Likes: 4
From: the great Maine wilderness
code 52 will not likely cause overheating. You will be running very rich, NOT lean, however, you could plug up your cat from running that rich for a while, and THAT could cause over heating. That being said... I ran with the code 52 for a year and a half before I got it sorted out, and never had any issues.
You can get away with mounting the KS on the engine lifting hook, BUT... you will only be sensing knock from half the engine. the engineers at Toyota mounted in the valley for a reason.....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MadMax48
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
16
Mar 3, 2020 10:33 AM
Kamaloha
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
1
Oct 16, 2015 05:13 PM
alexcarey
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
21
Oct 14, 2015 06:05 PM
Matthew Perez
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
9
Sep 28, 2015 05:43 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:30 AM.