Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

I still don't have a clear answer on 1st generation rear leaf springs.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-2008, 06:24 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
vmax84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I still don't have a clear answer on 1st generation rear leaf springs.

Are the leaf springs in my 89 4runner the same leaf springs in the 84, 85, 86, 87, and 88 4runners?

JcWhitney has a good deal going on leaf springs right now (my 4runner has the notorious butt drag) and they don't seem to think the springs would fit.

What gives here? Thanks.

vmax84

http://community.webshots.com/user/vmax82

http://www.jcwhitney.com/ALLOY-STEEL...3409_10101.jcw
Old 09-27-2008, 06:40 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
874runnersr5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Calgary, AB Canaduh
Posts: 3,948
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
im not to sure if all the leaf springs are the same for the first gen.
because on downey-off-road website, they have 86-88 then 89-95.
soo, possible there could be some slight variations.
http://www.downeyoff-road.com/Suspen...s/1986-95.html
Old 09-27-2008, 06:57 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
phildelfino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I would think if there are differences, it would be 84 & 85 are the same and 86, 87, 88 & 89 would be the same.

I bought those JC Whitney springs for my 88 4 Runner and they are bouncey.

Last edited by phildelfino; 09-27-2008 at 07:09 PM.
Old 09-27-2008, 06:58 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
874runnersr5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Calgary, AB Canaduh
Posts: 3,948
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
yeah?
im ordering mine on monday, any pro's/cons?
Old 09-27-2008, 07:09 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
phildelfino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
see my comment above.
Old 09-27-2008, 07:10 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
pepsibluefloat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think they are different, since when you do the trail gear rear lift kit you have to move both the front and rear hangers on 88 and on 89 you only have to move one. (i think thats correct, not 100% positive though)
Old 09-27-2008, 08:16 PM
  #7  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
BLKNBLU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by pepsibluefloat
i think they are different, since when you do the trail gear rear lift kit you have to move both the front and rear hangers on 88 and on 89 you only have to move one. (i think thats correct, not 100% positive though)
Moving hangers on those kits is because those springs are longer than stock. Nothing to do with what year.

Yeah they changed in there somewhere and I think it was '89 because the truck went to a new design in '89 but the runner not til '90. Not sure what Toyota did about the springs though. I believe the springs got wider on the truck but again I don't know if Toyota used up the rest of their skinny ones on the runners until they went to coils in '90 or used the wider truck leaves for one year of runner. FWIW the 2 parts sites i checked had the same part number for '88 and '89 runners and different numbers for '88 and '89 trucks. I just went and measured my '86 and they are 2 5/8" but if you look on parts sites that list a measurement (RockAuto) it says 2 1/2". If you noodle around you can probably find a site that lists the '89-'95 width which I think is 3". But buyer beware...I wouldn't swear to any of this as "for sure". Good luck.
Old 09-27-2008, 09:51 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
874runnersr5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Calgary, AB Canaduh
Posts: 3,948
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by phildelfino
see my comment above.
ah, i was thinking of the wrong product.
Old 09-27-2008, 10:54 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Pistonman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Kingston, Washington
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1989 Truck springs are longer. 47 inch eye to eye , earlier is 43 inch.
Old 09-29-2008, 09:34 PM
  #10  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
BLKNBLU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ran across this info in a Pirate thread about "rears up front" for lifting and SAS. Thought it could be useful.

Edit on 11-22-06 added info below
Heres some spring info about Toyota Leaf springs.


79-85 Toyota front
Flat length = 45"
Front Half = 22.5"
Rear Half = 22.5"
Width = 2.36"
Front Eyelet = 18mm ID
Rear Eyelet = 18mm ID


79-83 Toyota Rear
Flat length = 48"
Front Half = 21.125"
Rear Half = 26.875"
Width = 2.36"
Front Eyelet = 18mm ID
Rear Eyelet = 18mm ID


84-88 Toyota Rear
Flat length = 48"
Front Half = 20.5"
Rear Half = 27.5"
Width = 2.36"
Front Eyelet = 14mm ID
Rear Eyelet = 18mm ID


89-95 Toyota Rear
Flat length = 51"
Front Half = 21.5"
Rear Half = 29.5"
Width = 2.36"
Front Eyelet = 14mm ID
Rear Eyelet = 18mm ID
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedRunner_87
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
84
06-01-2021 01:51 PM
Regency
General Electrical & Lighting Related Topics
20
01-03-2020 07:43 PM
icentropy
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
10
07-11-2015 07:21 AM
colinmil
Newbie Tech Section
2
07-06-2015 04:03 PM
Vargntucson
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
07-04-2015 12:15 PM



Quick Reply: I still don't have a clear answer on 1st generation rear leaf springs.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:44 AM.