Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

heavier flywheels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 12:53 PM
  #1  
Matt16's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
heavier flywheels

Who's running one? The LCE 35lbs flywheel is a touch less than $300 and I'm hoping it might let me lug the engine down to lower rpms instead of doing lower gears on a chain drive case

Anyone added an inertia ring to the stock flywheel?
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 01:06 PM
  #2  
DupermanDave's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 3
From: Northern Colorado :-(
I'm not a clutch expert or an engine expert, but wouldnt lower RPMS cause the engine to use more gas to do the same amount of work at higher RPMS ?
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 01:14 PM
  #3  
NYChopshop's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: Back in New York City!
a heavier flywheel would do two things for you: it would up the rotational inertia of the engine's rotating assembly giving you somewhat more torque with somewhat less horsepower, and it would make your engine run smoother between firings of each cylinder. It would NOT lower rpm's for you, and it lowers efficiency, but it may make it easier to drive at low speeds. I suppose that's what its designed for.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 01:14 PM
  #4  
4Crawler's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 34
From: SF Bay Area, CA
I run the Centerforce heavy flywheel on my 22RE, had it for 10+ years now. I really like it, it nearly doubles the useable low end torque from my experience. It'll let the engine lug down to ~500 RPM in low range and not stall where w/ stock flywheel, it was more like 1000 RPM. For short hard sections of trail, it can save a downshift. It is a little tricky with the throttle down that slow so would not want to run a long rock garden like that. I found that w/ my stock flywheel, my truck could idle up my sloping driveway in 1st gear low range, but stall in 1-H, but with the heavier flywheel, it'll now idle up in 1-H.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 01:31 PM
  #5  
DupermanDave's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 3
From: Northern Colorado :-(
neato. I think I'm going to look into this more. How much do heavier flywheels run? if LCE is charging less than $300, i'd imagine other vendors being $120 to about $200
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 01:33 PM
  #6  
93YotaMonster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Mocksville NC
how well does the heavy flywheel work with gears ?

Last edited by 93YotaMonster; Sep 9, 2009 at 01:35 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 01:40 PM
  #7  
93YotaMonster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Mocksville NC
hey dupeman i think that every one who makes it is about the same price as lc
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 03:40 PM
  #8  
Matt16's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by 93YotaMonster
how well does the heavy flywheel work with gears ?
Gears would be a more effective mod I'm sure, but because I have a chain-drive t-case and not the money to buy the adapters, the case and re-tube the DS, this might be a more affordable option- a band-aid in a way. I don't do much rock crawling, and I use the truck a tonne for camping and rough backroads. I can't justify the gears on the rig just yet. Gears and a heavy flywheel would be like having your cake and eating it too.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 07:44 PM
  #9  
olharleyman's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,607
Likes: 2
From: maryland
I have a 38 lb. flywheel for my 3.4 swap and I got it from PHILSRUNNER4 as he told me it will pull a tree down but as a start it is slower to get you going but once it is going you don't even notice it really.

Last edited by olharleyman; Sep 9, 2009 at 07:47 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 07:56 PM
  #10  
abecedarian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 6
From: Temecula Valley, CA
heavy flywheel means it's harder to stall but also doesn't accelerate as quickly
next question....
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 08:21 PM
  #11  
SwampThing's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 0
From: South
You can shift earlier without your rpm dropping as much.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 08:27 PM
  #12  
abecedarian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 6
From: Temecula Valley, CA
Chrysler once had a supercar based on a turbine engine spinning a flywheel... it wasn't exactly all that quick (0-60 in about 5 seconds), nor all that fast (about 220 miles per hour, IIRC) but only had 2 gears (forward and reverse ). It had a constantly variable transmission though. The trick was that the flywheel kicked in to supply torque when the turbine was over-taxed and the turbine kicked in when the flywheel needed help. And it averaged about 30 MPG, from what I recall, and could burn most any flammable liquid.
Please feel free to correct me.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 12:10 AM
  #13  
drew303's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 2
From: Olympia, WA
Think of it as a (bench) grinding wheel.. Takes awhile to spin up. but when it's there it's going baby... turn off the switch.. takes awhile to spin down.

Doesn't seem like a good fix to not lowering your axle gears.. I don't see how making a flywheel heavier is a whole lot different than putting on say.. TSL's.. (ie heavier tire) .. granted thats at the very end of the drivetrain ... but for all practical (on-road) purposes of the conversation... gas mileage would go down me thinks

my opinion ofcourse.. i honestly have no idea =)

Last edited by drew303; Sep 10, 2009 at 12:11 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 05:52 AM
  #14  
volcomdork182's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
[quote=drew303;51225355]Think of it as a (bench) grinding wheel.. Takes awhile to spin up. but when it's there it's going baby... turn off the switch.. takes awhile to spin down.

Doesn't seem like a good fix to not lowering your axle gears.. I don't see how making a flywheel heavier is a whole lot different than putting on say.. TSL's.. (ie heavier tire) .. granted thats at the very end of the drivetrain ... but for all practical (on-road) purposes of the conversation... gas mileage would go down me thinks

my opinion ofcourse.. i honestly have no idea =)[quote]
it should in theory be easier to turn the larger wheels, and tow more weight, by increasing the torque at the wheels. More weight means more mass and more mass spinning constantly means that there is more centripital force so it would be harder to stop when engauged. But this is also taking away the hp from the engine due to having the extra weight on the drivetrain.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 09:14 AM
  #15  
Matt16's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by drew303
Think of it as a (bench) grinding wheel.. Takes awhile to spin up. but when it's there it's going baby... turn off the switch.. takes awhile to spin down.

Doesn't seem like a good fix to not lowering your axle gears.. I don't see how making a flywheel heavier is a whole lot different than putting on say.. TSL's.. (ie heavier tire) .. granted thats at the very end of the drivetrain ... but for all practical (on-road) purposes of the conversation... gas mileage would go down me thinks

my opinion ofcourse.. i honestly have no idea =)
The reason it would work better than TSLs is that when the tires are spinning at say 60rpm i first gear, the engine is doing ~2400rpm in first gear low range (assuming your crawl ratio is 40:1). The flywheel has a lot more angular momentum than than the tires. My physics isn't the best, but I would think that (assuming the tires weight twice as much as the flywheel) the flywheel would "store" 20x more energy than the tires... so, to get the same effect as adding 10lbs to the flywheel, you'd have to add 200lbs to the tires.


Basically, what i want hear who's done this and if they've had an problems (ie: slow acceleration, stressed crankshaft etc.).

Also, a quick search has only turned up LCE as a source for the weight-added flywheel.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 09:27 AM
  #16  
4Crawler's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 34
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Had mine (Centerforce: http://media.centerforce.com/Catalog...20Standard.pdf) for 10+ years. No stressed crank shaft or other drive train issues. Engine does rev up slower that w/ stock flywheel but with 4000+ lbs. of truck hooked up to the clutch, I really notice no difference in acceleration. And yes, stored rotational energy is proportional to the square of the rotational speed (RPM), so if the engine is spinning 40 times as fast as the tires, you have 1600 times the inertia in the flywheel vs. the wheels/tires (reduced of course by the ratio of the flywheel and wheel weights). Also no change in fuel mileage, but off road it works a lot nicer down in the very low RPMs (1000 and below).
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 06:34 PM
  #17  
Matt16's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by 4Crawler
Had mine (Centerforce: http://media.centerforce.com/Catalog...20Standard.pdf) for 10+ years. No stressed crank shaft or other drive train issues. Engine does rev up slower that w/ stock flywheel but with 4000+ lbs. of truck hooked up to the clutch, I really notice no difference in acceleration. And yes, stored rotational energy is proportional to the square of the rotational speed (RPM), so if the engine is spinning 40 times as fast as the tires, you have 1600 times the inertia in the flywheel vs. the wheels/tires (reduced of course by the ratio of the flywheel and wheel weights). Also no change in fuel mileage, but off road it works a lot nicer down in the very low RPMs (1000 and below).
I see that Centerforce carries a 29.0 lbs flywheel for the 22RE. Looks like that's probably the one you've got unless they've changed flywheel design. Part number is 700834. The stock is 23 lbs IIRC.

4Crawler, do you remember approx what you paid for it? I wonder if its that much cheaper than the 35lbs LCE flywheel. I'm wondering if 6lbs is really going to make much difference.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 06:41 PM
  #18  
BigBluePile's Avatar
Contributing Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,191
Likes: 190
From: Sedro-Woolley, WA
Cool idea, might have to add this to the pile...
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 08:19 PM
  #19  
desertcamper67's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
How is down shifting and compression braking affected? I'm talking about street driving and using the gears to slow down.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 08:21 PM
  #20  
4Crawler's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 34
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by Matt16
I see that Centerforce carries a 29.0 lbs flywheel for the 22RE. Looks like that's probably the one you've got unless they've changed flywheel design. Part number is 700834. The stock is 23 lbs IIRC.

4Crawler, do you remember approx what you paid for it? I wonder if its that much cheaper than the 35lbs LCE flywheel. I'm wondering if 6lbs is really going to make much difference.
I recall it was in the low $200s, that was back in late '98, from some on-line 4x4 shop in AZ. I hear that the 22RE turbo flywheel is somewhat heavier than the 22RE part, not sure of the exact weight difference.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:47 AM.