Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Dual Exhaust on 94 4runner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 07:00 AM
  #1  
EvergreenToy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: High Point, NC
Dual Exhaust on 94 4runner

I want dual exhaust on my 4runner, but I've heard complications can arise. What I want to know is, can it be done? A catback split would be fine, I'm really after the look and the sound. Any part ideas? Install tips?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 07:27 AM
  #2  
Jay351's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 10
From: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
Yes it can be done, anything can...

Problems can arise like you mentioned. Clearance is tight for a dual exhaust. And the 3vze hates big pipes... I would go to something like a dual 2" or smaller pipe diameter....
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 09:18 AM
  #3  
Matt16's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
If its look you're after, why not just have a dummy exhaust pipe coming out the back and a good muffler on the "real" exhaust. That would be a whole lot simpler, but I really haven't payed attention to what sounds good on Toyota trucks. IMO you need big displacement to sound good on a truck (thus Toyota's don't sound "good" to me.) Sound preference is very subjective.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 09:23 AM
  #4  
Tubbyfatty's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,903
Likes: 2
From: Hillsboro, OR
This has been brought up in the past. Earlier last week i believe. Just search for "exhaust suggestions" or something along those lines. But basically you cant go true dual because you dont have enough flow. Search.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 10:25 AM
  #5  
RobD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 5
From: Calgary, AB
Massive waste of money. The 3.0 needs scavanging from the exhaust. Basically, without enough back pressure, you won't get a good enough fuel/air charge. Anything above 2.25" pipe will cause you to lose power.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 10:30 AM
  #6  
sa51's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: NH/NY/FL
Originally Posted by RobD
Massive waste of money. The 3.0 needs scavanging from the exhaust. Basically, without enough back pressure, you won't get a good enough fuel/air charge. Anything above 2.25" pipe will cause you to lose power.
agreed, i bought my 4 cylinder with dual flowmasters and no cat on it, it ran and sounded like crap. i replaced it with a downey system and a hi flow cat and it still sounds like a civic, but not nearly as bad.
ive been looking into flowmaster's hushpower series and i think i'm going to replace it with that and a 2 inch pipe instead of 2.5
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 06:56 AM
  #7  
EvergreenToy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: High Point, NC
Alright, good stuff. My cousin's taco has duals on it, i don't think theyre true duals though, sounds pretty good, and provides decent power, but then again he has the 3.4L six, which may make a big difference. So if I decided to just go single, while diameter should i go for?
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 07:21 AM
  #8  
EvergreenToy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: High Point, NC
Just browsing around and found a dynomax cat back single as well as a Thorley system, also found a 50 series muffler. Opinions welcome.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 07:27 AM
  #9  
mastacox's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 2
From: Fort Worth, TX
I would highly recommend the Flowmaster 50 Series SUV. On my old '92 4Runner I had a 2.5" header-back exhaust with 2.5" Catco high flow cat and 2.5" in-out 50 series muffler. It sounded great, and was a good match for the 3.slow turd IMO.

Last edited by mastacox; Dec 10, 2008 at 07:31 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 01:20 PM
  #10  
jason724's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mastacox
I would highly recommend the Flowmaster 50 Series SUV. On my old '92 4Runner I had a 2.5" header-back exhaust with 2.5" Catco high flow cat and 2.5" in-out 50 series muffler. It sounded great, and was a good match for the 3.slow turd IMO.
Did you have a FIPIK on it too?
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 02:58 PM
  #11  
mastacox's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 2
From: Fort Worth, TX
Originally Posted by jason724
Did you have a FIPIK on it too?
Nah, I just had the stock intake.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 03:12 PM
  #12  
Jay351's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 10
From: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
2.25" Pipe diameter. NO bigger. The 3vze is pretty small, and its stock 21/8" pipe is almost perfect. Since 2.25" is easy to find and will provide a little bump in power WITHOUT losing low end power like a 2.5" pipe will..

P.s Don't buy a K&N fipk.

Search ISR mod and make one yourself for under $20.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 03:30 PM
  #13  
mastacox's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 2
From: Fort Worth, TX
Originally Posted by Jay351
2.25" Pipe diameter. NO bigger. The 3vze is pretty small, and its stock 21/8" pipe is almost perfect. Since 2.25" is easy to find and will provide a little bump in power WITHOUT losing low end power like a 2.5" pipe will..
Pipe sizing is a fuzzy subject, but I'll tell you right now 2.5" is a very common aftermarket exhaust size used on the 3.Slow (most aftermarket headers have a 2.5" collector). I didn't experience any of the dreaded power loss you're describing, perhaps you could point us to a set of dyno sheets that verifies what you're claiming?

Originally Posted by Jay351
P.s Don't buy a K&N fipk.
x2 on that, FIPK's are crap.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 03:53 PM
  #14  
jason724's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Jay351
P.s Don't buy a K&N fipk.
What about an S&B intake, I've heard they're much better than the K&N ones... http://www.sbfilters.com/products/pr...number=75-9006

The only reason I've kind of leaned away from the ISR mod is that I'm not really big into DIY projects because my 4Runner is my only means of transportation, so I can't afford to have it off the road for very long. I'm also kind of hesitant because of all the sensors and such.... Unless there's an easy way to leave all the sock tubing and just by pass the ISR thing. Sorry for the thread hi-jack. (I'll start a new thread)

Don't go for a dual exhaust, it'd be a huge hassle only for a loss in performance... And it'd be a PITA to do it yourself because you'd have to bend the pipes around the spare tire..
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 03:58 PM
  #15  
tman12345's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Western, MA
how bout you split it after the muffler into duels?
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 04:19 PM
  #16  
thedude42's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: j town Tennessee
yea i have seen a 4 runner on here a green one a 3rd gen that has duels

i believe that if you run a 1 in 2 out duel pipes it should work fine just split them after the cat keep 2in or 2.25 in pipe till the crome tip!
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 05:42 PM
  #17  
Jay351's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 10
From: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
Originally Posted by mastacox
Pipe sizing is a fuzzy subject, but I'll tell you right now 2.5" is a very common aftermarket exhaust size used on the 3.Slow (most aftermarket headers have a 2.5" collector). I didn't experience any of the dreaded power loss you're describing, perhaps you could point us to a set of dyno sheets that verifies what you're claiming?



x2 on that, FIPK's are crap.

It's true, thats a very common size. But take a peek at the more high end exhausts. They are all 2.25". 2.5" for the 3vze is pretty damn big, most small v8's come with 2.5" pipes...
I don't have any hard numbers, but from what people on both sides have told me, 2.5" piping caused a loss in low end power, but a gain in top end (make sence eh?). 2.25" is the most you want to go to keep a little extra low end power....


Originally Posted by jason724
What about an S&B intake, I've heard they're much better than the K&N ones... http://www.sbfilters.com/products/pr...number=75-9006

The only reason I've kind of leaned away from the ISR mod is that I'm not really big into DIY projects because my 4Runner is my only means of transportation, so I can't afford to have it off the road for very long. I'm also kind of hesitant because of all the sensors and such.... Unless there's an easy way to leave all the sock tubing and just by pass the ISR thing. Sorry for the thread hi-jack. (I'll start a new thread)

Don't go for a dual exhaust, it'd be a huge hassle only for a loss in performance... And it'd be a PITA to do it yourself because you'd have to bend the pipes around the spare tire..

Actually, the isr mod only requires a few hours down time (tops!).

Go to the exhaust shop, get a 3" diameter exhaust pipe (about 13") bent in the middle with 46 degree bend.

Remove your stock intake and mock up the new pipe. Remove and reinstall the stock intake so your truck is usable while you make the pipe.

Drill two holes and attach some brass fittings (for the two crankcase vents you must plumb in).

Get two 3" rubber hose peices (about 3" long) and 4 band clamps.

Install. Add some paint to make it look more factory

If you do it this way, you only spend about 30 mins removing the intake, mocking up the new pipe then re-installing the old intake.

Then your truck is fully functionable untill your ISR pipe is ready to install..
Its not like you wreck the stock stuff, its all reversable (very easily!).

I will show you a picture of mine once cardomain is back up...

Last edited by Jay351; Dec 10, 2008 at 05:43 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 05:50 PM
  #18  
HupDogDaddy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Cowtown Tx.
I have the Jardine cat back exhaust with downey headers. It's not a dual system but it actually sounds decent. But it did add 200 HP so I'm good with it
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 07:55 PM
  #19  
Yotas&Jellos's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, CA
Originally Posted by HupDogDaddy
I have the Jardine cat back exhaust with downey headers. It's not a dual system but it actually sounds decent. But it did add 200 HP so I'm good with it
200hp?

Is that a typo?
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 04:57 AM
  #20  
HupDogDaddy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Cowtown Tx.
200 extra HP is easy with the 3.0
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:10 AM.