5w30 to light?
#1
5w30 to light?
I had a coupon for getting my oil changed for $16.50 at my local Midas shop and after they changed my oil they said they used kendal 5w30. With the onset of summer here in colorado, temps between 30 and 70, is this to light to run in my 4Runner with almost 180,000?
Last edited by co4rnr; Apr 4, 2007 at 10:04 AM.
Trending Topics
#10
I think 5W30 is too light for the 3VZ, 22R, etc. era engines. Should be fine for 5VZ and modern engines. I run 10W30 or 10W40, usually 10W40 in the middle of the summer, I feel hot weather and long trips mean 10W40.
#12
Rob
#13
A multi weight oil is whatever the lower number is and has additives that make it thicker when hot. So a 5W30 is basically a 5W oil that achieves the viscosity that a 30W would when hot. It's still fundamentally a thinner oil and it's just my opinion that a 5W base is too thin for older engines. The cold start is why I want a 10W-whatever. Even when new, the clearances on old engines weren't as tight as more modern engines and having a thicker film to fill the clearance seems like it would be a good thing on start-up. This is even more true as an engine gets hours, the bearing clearances get even looser, so running a 0W or 5W at cold start means there's a relatively thinner coating of oil between the two wearing surfaces. Once an engine is warmed and running, most any oil will work. The majority of your engine wear comes in the first minute or two. I still think that going with what the manufacturer says the engine is designed to work with is the best thing. I could be wrong, but there is more to start-up than /just/ the oil flowing, it must also be able to fill the void between surfaces and act like a cushion. That is less about the oil pumping, but the viscosity of the pool of oil that the crank is sitting in. I do agree that 0W and 5W oils flow better, but do they protect well enough at start? I simply don't know and so I just go with the owner's manual. Then there's the fact that the R motors use a chain tensioner that is based on oil pressure and that was designed to operate with a certain weight oil. At start-up do the thinner oils let the tensioner work correctly? Just wondering and, again, since I don't know for a fact that it works right with 0W and 5W, I'll trust the book. I'm presenting my reasoning, I might be completely off base. I know that 5W30 and 10W30 have the same approximate hot viscosity, but they are different at cold.
#14
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,656
Likes: 16
From: NW Ark on wooded ten acres...Ozarks at large!
I was told a long time ago by Toyota technician that ( EDIT:for an '86 22re)the factory manual calls for 20w-50!!! Was I hood winked? That's what I've been running. (That or M1 15w-50). Should I switch? I'm wondering because it doesn't seem happy with it (rough winter start-up, valve noise...which could be just adjustment), but I was told I should run it. So....
Last edited by thook; Apr 4, 2007 at 02:54 PM.
#15
In my 2007 Tacoma 4x4 4.0 L, the manual says:
< -------------------- 5w-30 ------------------------->
Thanks for the info DaveInDenver. Nice handle, by the way.
So, let's say 100,000 miles go by. You think it would be wise to switch to 10w-30, even though the manual says 5w-30?
Thanks again
< -------------------- 5w-30 ------------------------->
Thanks for the info DaveInDenver. Nice handle, by the way.
So, let's say 100,000 miles go by. You think it would be wise to switch to 10w-30, even though the manual says 5w-30?
Thanks again
#16
In the 22re's I used 20W-50 when I lived in California, I went to Montana in the winter and I had to switch to 10W40 as the 20W50 was wayyy too thick in the 10 degrees fahreinheit weather.
#17
Thook, since you live in Arkansas, I would use 10W40 in the few coldest months and 20W50 the rest of the time. That toyota tech was correct. In the early 80's 20R and 22R engines called for 20W50 oil from the factory.
#18
So a 5W30 is basically a 5W oil that achieves the viscosity that a 30W would when hot. It's still fundamentally a thinner oil and it's just my opinion that a 5W base is too thin for older engines. The cold start is why I want a 10W-whatever. Even when new, the clearances on old engines weren't as tight as more modern engines and having a thicker film to fill the clearance seems like it would be a good thing on start-up. This is even more true as an engine gets hours, the bearing clearances get even looser, so running a 0W or 5W at cold start means there's a relatively thinner coating of oil between the two wearing surfaces.
This site agrees with the thinking I've heard (look under the Oil Viscosity heading)
I'm not saying you are wrong and I'm right (if you knew me you would know I'm not one to argue); I'm just writing what I've read on other forums and it makes sense to me. For all I know I could be completely wrong lol.
Rob
Last edited by rdlsz24; Apr 5, 2007 at 06:26 AM.
#20
What you described is exactly the opposite of what I've always heard regarding the "cold" or W part of oil. I've always heard you want a lower W number so that it can get into the little places quicker when it's cold. That's the reason I run 0W-40 in my '04 GTO, as do many other LS1 owners.
This site agrees with the thinking I've heard (look under the Oil Viscosity heading)
I'm not saying you are wrong and I'm right (if you knew me you would know I'm not one to argue); I'm just writing what I've read on other forums and it makes sense to me. For all I know I could be completely wrong lol.
Rob
This site agrees with the thinking I've heard (look under the Oil Viscosity heading)
I'm not saying you are wrong and I'm right (if you knew me you would know I'm not one to argue); I'm just writing what I've read on other forums and it makes sense to me. For all I know I could be completely wrong lol.
Rob
http://63.240.161.99/motoroil/index.html
And a big thread about oil from the newer truck owners over on CT:
http://www.customtacos.com/forum/showthread.php?t=78789


